My thoughts go out to the Mesa Employees.
Let us all hope, that every single block hour and CRJ900 gets absorbed into mainline flying. Let's hope this doesn't get pushed around to other regionals..giving all us furloughed pilots our crappy jobs back. |
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 738153)
Skywest... Easily! But the question comes down will USAPA sit and allow CRJ900's to be given away yet again and violate the current contract with the number of large RJ's....
Back to reality now, how many -900s are in violation of the USAPA contract? What about the UA side of things? |
Originally Posted by Theonemarine
(Post 738147)
I think AWAC is the only operator that could afford the -900's
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 738159)
Aren't they already in violation?
I think that is exactly what he is saying. USAPA has already made a case against there being too many big-little jets. Any change to the current operation would be, in essence, removing the Mesa 900s even if they were immediately reinstating them with the new carrier. USAPA would have more traction, I think, in their attempt to stop that. |
Originally Posted by contrail67
(Post 738001)
And here comes XJT. Time to load up on this stock.
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 738182)
Don't forget Skywest Inc. They have been watching this flying for over a year and have PLENTY of money. CLT 900s to ASA, PHX 900s to Skywest
|
Originally Posted by Trip7
(Post 738182)
Don't forget Skywest Inc. They have been watching this flying for over a year and have PLENTY of money. CLT 900s to ASA, PHX 900s to Skywest
|
Originally Posted by PSACFI
(Post 738177)
Well in that case I hope some or all the -900s go to US mainline. Wishful thinking I know. :D
Back to reality now, how many -900s are in violation of the USAPA contract? What about the UA side of things? AWE/USA is not going to fly -900's. Period. That's just some wet dreams for guys that get paid $20 an hour to fly them. I don't know what the USAPA contract says. but if it's a 70 or 76 seat limit, that's easy to accomplish with -900's. |
Originally Posted by deadstick35
(Post 738183)
I think that is exactly what he is saying.
USAPA has already made a case against there being too many big-little jets. Any change to the current operation would be, in essence, removing the Mesa 900s even if they were immediately reinstating them with the new carrier. USAPA would have more traction, I think, in their attempt to stop that. |
To all the MESA employees I wish you the best of luck. This is not a time for people to badger them this is going to be hard times for them a lot of people with families will be losing there jobs, in an economic time that is very difficult.
I wish you the best of luck. |
Originally Posted by AirWillie
(Post 738136)
The only people that are dependent on Mesa is Airways. The question is, who has enough cash to get Mesa's CRJ900 operation? Airways or another regional and under ownership or a scrap yard sale?
Nothing will change in regards to current contracts with delta, united, and usairways. Under reorganization plan they can cherri pick contracts for ch11. As I understand only certain aircraft leases are in ch11 filing. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:54 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands