How do majors view retiring staffers?
#1
On Reserve
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 10
How do majors view retiring staffers?
Hello everyone. Here's my situation. I'm an AD member of the military with about 2500 hours of single-engine military jet time, however, will be in a non-flying staff job for 3 years when I retire in 2019. I have every instructor qualification that you can obtain within my community and even did a three year tour as an IP at our fleet replacement squadron.
My question is one of currency and how the majors view using General Aviation to regain currency prior to retirement. I have my ATP and CF-II but only have the opportunity to fly dual engine GA aircraft over the next two years. If I can fly 100-150 hours over the next 24 months, is that enough to get the attention of the majors? I'm definitely not above going the regional route, I'm just trying to manage expectations for my family. Any advice or insight would be much appreciated.
My question is one of currency and how the majors view using General Aviation to regain currency prior to retirement. I have my ATP and CF-II but only have the opportunity to fly dual engine GA aircraft over the next two years. If I can fly 100-150 hours over the next 24 months, is that enough to get the attention of the majors? I'm definitely not above going the regional route, I'm just trying to manage expectations for my family. Any advice or insight would be much appreciated.
#2
They view you as a great candidate. You have all the good tickets punched, all the military discipline and team spirit, you're a grownup, and unlike mid-career mil people you're probably not going to join the guard/reserve and drop 90 days of mil leave each year (they really like that last part).
They also understand military career progression and know that not everyone can retire out of the cockpit. Unlike a civilian who took a voluntary break from aviation, they will not hold that against you as a sign of weak commitment to flying. Even though some people do it, no airline expects mil pilots to walk away from the retirement at 16-17 years just because they detail you out of the cockpit.
Caveat: Currency is an issue. They know from experience that it's a key factor in training success. People have in the past met the bare minimum via GA and gotten hired but the sense I get today is that they greatly prefer turbine recency in a professional (vice re recreational) environment.
A little GA time would be good to prep for that regional or ISR gig, but I probably would not recommend hanging your hat on that. The good news is that you could try if you wanted to, and if the majors call, great. If not you'll be current for whatever else.
The regionals will require only bare minimum legal currency, so that could be cheaper than 100+ hours (also only need ASEL for that). But if you go minimalist, focus on instruments...regionals will not teach you how to fly instruments again. A checkride bust in some regional's half-arsed training program will complicate your progression to the majors.
Hopefully others will chime in.
They also understand military career progression and know that not everyone can retire out of the cockpit. Unlike a civilian who took a voluntary break from aviation, they will not hold that against you as a sign of weak commitment to flying. Even though some people do it, no airline expects mil pilots to walk away from the retirement at 16-17 years just because they detail you out of the cockpit.
Caveat: Currency is an issue. They know from experience that it's a key factor in training success. People have in the past met the bare minimum via GA and gotten hired but the sense I get today is that they greatly prefer turbine recency in a professional (vice re recreational) environment.
A little GA time would be good to prep for that regional or ISR gig, but I probably would not recommend hanging your hat on that. The good news is that you could try if you wanted to, and if the majors call, great. If not you'll be current for whatever else.
The regionals will require only bare minimum legal currency, so that could be cheaper than 100+ hours (also only need ASEL for that). But if you go minimalist, focus on instruments...regionals will not teach you how to fly instruments again. A checkride bust in some regional's half-arsed training program will complicate your progression to the majors.
Hopefully others will chime in.
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,897
Today you would Probably have to plan on doing some time at the regionals, especially if your GA flying isn't an employed position.
Three years from now- who knows. There's been talk of some of the majors looking to make their currency requirements for transitioning military less stringent than they currently are but who knows if that will actually happen.
Sounds like worse case scenario for you is a regional in 2019. I'd have all of my apps in next year and plan on a regional in 2019.
Three years from now- who knows. There's been talk of some of the majors looking to make their currency requirements for transitioning military less stringent than they currently are but who knows if that will actually happen.
Sounds like worse case scenario for you is a regional in 2019. I'd have all of my apps in next year and plan on a regional in 2019.
#4
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 87
See my post (and a lot of other great info on this topic) in the "Staff Guy to Regionals" thread in this section. I was hired by United 1.5 years into an AGR staff job at the Pentagon after 17+ years flying on AD and 2 years flying as an ART. I started basic indoc having not flown an airplane for 2 years, 1 month. I didn't retire (still a reservist), but I was in the typical 18+ year, "have to do a staff job at some point" position, hoping I'd get picked up by a legacy but ready for a regional if needed.
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 376
Keep flying as much as you can. Hope for a major. Hope is not a plan so expect regionals. Financially plan for 24 months of regional flying after separation and be super happy if you only have to spend 6.
The above is exactly what I am doing. I have been on desk duty since 2013 and retiring in 2018.
The above is exactly what I am doing. I have been on desk duty since 2013 and retiring in 2018.
#7
China Visa Applicant
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Just a couple other times this has been discussed recently:
Getting Back into the Game
Staff guy to regionals
Getting Back into the Game
Staff guy to regionals
#8
apply to the majors for sure... but at the same time apply to any of the regionals that don't have a training contract. Apply, get hired, fly 3-4 months, update your resume, and you'll more than likely get an interview at a major.
#10
On Reserve
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Position: 73N F/O
Posts: 18
They view you as a great candidate. You have all the good tickets punched, all the military discipline and team spirit, you're a grownup, and unlike mid-career mil people you're probably not going to join the guard/reserve and drop 90 days of mil leave each year (they really like that last part).
They also understand military career progression and know that not everyone can retire out of the cockpit. Unlike a civilian who took a voluntary break from aviation, they will not hold that against you as a sign of weak commitment to flying. Even though some people do it, no airline expects mil pilots to walk away from the retirement at 16-17 years just because they detail you out of the cockpit.
Caveat: Currency is an issue. They know from experience that it's a key factor in training success. People have in the past met the bare minimum via GA and gotten hired but the sense I get today is that they greatly prefer turbine recency in a professional (vice re recreational) environment.
A little GA time would be good to prep for that regional or ISR gig, but I probably would not recommend hanging your hat on that. The good news is that you could try if you wanted to, and if the majors call, great. If not you'll be current for whatever else.
The regionals will require only bare minimum legal currency, so that could be cheaper than 100+ hours (also only need ASEL for that). But if you go minimalist, focus on instruments...regionals will not teach you how to fly instruments again. A checkride bust in some regional's half-arsed training program will complicate your progression to the majors.
Hopefully others will chime in.
They also understand military career progression and know that not everyone can retire out of the cockpit. Unlike a civilian who took a voluntary break from aviation, they will not hold that against you as a sign of weak commitment to flying. Even though some people do it, no airline expects mil pilots to walk away from the retirement at 16-17 years just because they detail you out of the cockpit.
Caveat: Currency is an issue. They know from experience that it's a key factor in training success. People have in the past met the bare minimum via GA and gotten hired but the sense I get today is that they greatly prefer turbine recency in a professional (vice re recreational) environment.
A little GA time would be good to prep for that regional or ISR gig, but I probably would not recommend hanging your hat on that. The good news is that you could try if you wanted to, and if the majors call, great. If not you'll be current for whatever else.
The regionals will require only bare minimum legal currency, so that could be cheaper than 100+ hours (also only need ASEL for that). But if you go minimalist, focus on instruments...regionals will not teach you how to fly instruments again. A checkride bust in some regional's half-arsed training program will complicate your progression to the majors.
Hopefully others will chime in.
Very well said. I think you hit all the big points.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post