Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
USN grounds all T-45s >

USN grounds all T-45s

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

USN grounds all T-45s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2017, 11:38 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Hopefully OBOGS can get re-engineered with some serious improvements. F-18, F-22, and now T-45 have a history of issues. Poisoning warriors is bad press, but its even worse for combat effectiveness.

F-22 guys did a similar "stand down" for a while, and largely kept it out of media. Eventually word does get out...
Albief15 is offline  
Old 04-10-2017, 12:48 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hindsight2020's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Center seat, doing loops to music
Posts: 825
Default

Knock on wood, 1000 hours flown on the T-6A poisoning free, though I won't know until many years later if the thing dusted me with carcinogenics imperceptible to my body's allergic reaction threshold. Brings a perverse new meaning to the thank you for my service platitude....

These days I'm back to the relative inconvenience of flying behind the good ol leaking LOX in the mighty Talon, leaving me stranded off station 6-9 times a year, unless I get the OG waiver on the repo flight below 10. And you know what? I love it. The devil I know is much preferable to the one I don't.

Hope they figure out what's going on with the -45 OBOGS so they can get back up to hackin' da mish. everybody stay safe out there.
hindsight2020 is offline  
Old 04-11-2017, 04:29 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BDGERJMN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Walmart Greeter
Posts: 694
Default

I'd be very interested to hear from some folks in Kingsville or Meridian on how all of this went down. While I applaud the IPs for taking a stand, the way they went about it, organizing a 'sick out' in a military squadron is just not right. Where were the COs and/or Commodore in this? Why go VFR direct to Fox News and undercut the air boss? Did the IPs talk directly with CNATRA before they did this or did they just take it on their own accord to ORM out as a group? I get that safety comes first and I'm not advocating anything less, I just think there were/are other ways of dealing with this issue to get the visibility it needs (if it's not already in work). Those of us who fly Hornets/Supers know that the Hypoxia/ECS/Pressurization issues are at the top of the list for safety concerns/priorities. To say they are not not, is just flat wrong. If its not being done fast enough, again, I get it and would opine that there are a number of other avenues and ways to get after this problem with leadership to include the air boss (actual) rather than VFR direct to Fox News who only reported what they wanted and put out a TON of misinformation to the public, just my $.02.
BDGERJMN is offline  
Old 04-11-2017, 05:48 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Chief of Naval Operations: ""I think what we had more than anything else was a breakdown in communication. And those teams are on-site now working through each of the training wings, they are resolving the differences in perspective and the differences in communication." That's it! What we have here is a............"failure to communicate".
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 04-11-2017, 09:52 AM
  #15  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

BDGERJMN,

While I agree going to the media is a terrible choice, it seems that the CoC completely let them down.

Did CNAF know about this? The IPs... the experts in the field... DID push these issues up the CoC... and they got stonewalled.

Where?

The IP cadre filed safety reports until the cows came home. They briefed their commanders and the Commodore. Apparently, the info was forwarded to Corpus. It sure sounds like this steaming pile lays at the feet of CNATRA. How does he get briefed on all of these incidents, and yet he doesn't run the plethora of fleet-safety information further up the chain?

Kind of interesting how now this is CNATRA's #1 priority. Too bad it wasn't 6 months ago. It took a beating to make it so.

I don't know Admiral Bull, but from those I do know that know him, their description matches well to what has happened.

If my conclusions are correct, then CNAF needs to send CNATRA packing.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 04-11-2017, 07:34 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,187
Default

Originally Posted by BDGERJMN View Post
I'd be very interested to hear from some folks in Kingsville or Meridian on how all of this went down. While I applaud the IPs for taking a stand, the way they went about it, organizing a 'sick out' in a military squadron is just not right. Where were the COs and/or Commodore in this? Why go VFR direct to Fox News and undercut the air boss? Did the IPs talk directly with CNATRA before they did this or did they just take it on their own accord to ORM out as a group? I get that safety comes first and I'm not advocating anything less, I just think there were/are other ways of dealing with this issue to get the visibility it needs (if it's not already in work). Those of us who fly Hornets/Supers know that the Hypoxia/ECS/Pressurization issues are at the top of the list for safety concerns/priorities. To say they are not not, is just flat wrong. If its not being done fast enough, again, I get it and would opine that there are a number of other avenues and ways to get after this problem with leadership to include the air boss (actual) rather than VFR direct to Fox News who only reported what they wanted and put out a TON of misinformation to the public, just my $.02.
Everything Huggy said. They did the last thing they could to fix this issue. The T-45 OBOGS incidents were becoming much more frequent and much more serious than any Hornet OBOGS issue. Being privvy to some inside information on the issue, it's a **** storm of epic proportions and if the working theory turns out to be true CNATRA should not only be fired but stripped of everything for not acting.

No one went to the news, it gained traction mainly because the VPs son is there.
Grumble is offline  
Old 04-12-2017, 03:08 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
Everything Huggy said. They did the last thing they could to fix this issue. The T-45 OBOGS incidents were becoming much more frequent and much more serious than any Hornet OBOGS issue. Being privvy to some inside information on the issue, it's a **** storm of epic proportions and if the working theory turns out to be true CNATRA should not only be fired but stripped of everything for not acting.

No one went to the news, it gained traction mainly because the VPs son is there.
We lost people to the OBOGS issue in the Hornet community you'll remember.

I'm not keeping track since I left, but did the T-45 community have Class As associated with OBOGS?

Also - when I left - they were just implementing the 'Air Quality' caution annunciator in the Hornet fleet (I don't remember what the ann was actually - maybe air concentration?). Did that not happen or not work?
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 04-12-2017, 03:55 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BDGERJMN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Walmart Greeter
Posts: 694
Default

My post wasn't intended to point fingers at all, simply stating that I disagreed with the way the instructor cadre went about it, and asking some tough questions. What's done is done and it's time to move forward. As a CO, I understand both sides of the leadership coin, those COs and Commodores were/are definitely in a tough position and I'm not in their shoes; I don't envy their position. I hope that through all of this, the culprit is found and these airplanes/systems can be fixed and get back to training the future in Naval Aviation.

USMC - there is an OBOGS DEGD caution on the DDI which you are familiar with. A CABIN (on lower right cautions panel, not DDI) caution was installed as part of the Cabin Pressurization Warning System (A-D AFC 466, E/F ECP 6217) and put in place in Legacy/Super hornets to let aircrew know the cabin altitude is above 21000' +/- 1100'. I can't speak to the OBOGs/CABIN PRESS cautions in the T-45.
BDGERJMN is offline  
Old 04-12-2017, 04:39 AM
  #19  
Otto
Thread Starter
 
MikeF16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Turkish Pile Driver
Posts: 1,806
Default

Originally Posted by BDGERJMN View Post
My post wasn't intended to point fingers at all, simply stating that I disagreed with the way the instructor cadre went about it, and asking some tough questions. What's done is done and it's time to move forward. As a CO, I understand both sides of the leadership coin, those COs and Commodores were/are definitely in a tough position and I'm not in their shoes; I don't envy their position. I hope that through all of this, the culprit is found and these airplanes/systems can be fixed and get back to training the future in Naval Aviation.

USMC - there is an OBOGS DEGD caution on the DDI which you are familiar with. A CABIN (on lower right cautions panel, not DDI) caution was installed as part of the Cabin Pressurization Warning System (A-D AFC 466, E/F ECP 6217) and put in place in Legacy/Super hornets to let aircrew know the cabin altitude is above 21000' +/- 1100'. I can't speak to the OBOGs/CABIN PRESS cautions in the T-45.
What didn't you like about the way the instructors went about it? I didn't see any USN O-3s on the news. They refused to fly the plane, Lt Pence is there, the news got a hold of it.
MikeF16 is offline  
Old 04-12-2017, 04:57 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BDGERJMN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Walmart Greeter
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by MikeF16 View Post
What didn't you like about the way the instructors went about it? I didn't see any USN O-3s on the news. They refused to fly the plane, Lt Pence is there, the news got a hold of it.
Because I don't feel that organizing a 'sick out' in a military squadron then interviewing with Fox News was the appropriate way to do it. As I stated, I personally feel there were other avenues of approach, again my opinion. You didn't see any O-3s on Fox News because they were unnamed sources quoted in the article and on TV. Pence being there was ancillary and helped the media with some sound bites, not the thrust of the story.
BDGERJMN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
2
04-10-2015 06:50 AM
TheFly
Major
6
02-27-2015 06:17 PM
LAX Pilot
Safety
35
08-26-2013 12:09 AM
Squawk_5543
Regional
22
06-17-2007 06:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices