Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Are former military pilots subject to recall >

Are former military pilots subject to recall

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Are former military pilots subject to recall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2017, 04:54 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,608
Default

if WWIII (or something like the movie "independence day") kicked off; maybe... but other than that they will use stop loss.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 12:01 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,262
Default

A large portion of the lift required in any conflicts comes directly from the airlines. Forcing them into a pilot shortage would be counter productive. They will do as they have the last couple of major pushes and contract to the airlines.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-12-2017, 06:18 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KYTBRD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: MD-11
Posts: 245
Default

I'm sure there would be some sort of physical for recalled folks. Just fail the PT test once and you've got nothing to worry about.
KYTBRD is offline  
Old 05-13-2017, 03:51 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,280
Default

Originally Posted by KYTBRD View Post
I'm sure there would be some sort of physical for recalled folks. Just fail the PT test once and you've got nothing to worry about.
If I got recalled from retirement, I'd walk the test. Probably more of a mosey.
JTwift is offline  
Old 05-13-2017, 10:35 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aeroengineer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 324
Default

Given most military pilots are commissioned officers (as opposed to WOs) I would say if you haven't resigned your commission you can be recalled whether in a reserve component or not. I saw some recalled in that category for a time in Iraq though I think they eventually allowed some who were recalled to resign in lieu of deployment. The first group called had some who did deploy involuntarily before policy changed.
aeroengineer is offline  
Old 05-13-2017, 02:51 PM
  #16  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by aeroengineer View Post
Given most military pilots are commissioned officers (as opposed to WOs) I would say if you haven't resigned your commission you can be recalled whether in a reserve component or not. I saw some recalled in that category for a time in Iraq though I think they eventually allowed some who were recalled to resign in lieu of deployment. The first group called had some who did deploy involuntarily before policy changed.
If you hold a commission you'll still be in the inactive reserve in some category or other. The military does NOT want commission holders running around who are not under their thumb in some fashion. This was legally possible in the distant past but probably not today.

Often you get released automatically when your eight years are up or you hit HYT tenure for your rank.

But it's possible to keep getting promoted in the inactive reserve, which would kick that can to the right. It's also possible that they waive HYT and keep you in beyond HYT. But they can only keep you in past your obligation if you don't resign.

If it's an issue for you, make sure you resign at the latter of eight years or whatever your service obligation is.

If you never got a letter acknowledging your discharge or resignation, you might still be in the inactive reserve (or the letter might have got lost in the mail).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-13-2017, 04:57 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,621
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
A large portion of the lift required in any conflicts comes directly from the airlines. Forcing them into a pilot shortage would be counter productive. They will do as they have the last couple of major pushes and contract to the airlines.
You are referencing the CRAF and it doesn't really work that way.

The CRAF augments the military's capabilities. The military has to max out it's own aircraft, crews, and lift capability before the CRAF will be activated. Then there are certain levels or increments to which USTRANSCOM/SecDef can activate them. The participating airlines are given lucrative peacetime government/military business or contracts to offset costs for any potential activation. And by law, they're required to maintain crew ratios and a certain percentage of aircraft to be available if activated. I'm pretty sure this means they can't count an active reservist on their pilot list as part of the required aircrew to aircraft ratio as this reservists might be recalled.

I could be wrong ... and often I am. But I don't think I am in this manner. Any CRAF/USTRANSCOM experts?
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Old 05-13-2017, 05:20 PM
  #18  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox View Post
You are referencing the CRAF and it doesn't really work that way.

The CRAF augments the military's capabilities. The military has to max out it's own aircraft, crews, and lift capability before the CRAF will be activated. Then there are certain levels or increments to which USTRANSCOM/SecDef can activate them. The participating airlines are given lucrative peacetime government/military business or contracts to offset costs for any potential activation. And by law, they're required to maintain crew ratios and a certain percentage of aircraft to be available if activated. I'm pretty sure this means they can't count an active reservist on their pilot list as part of the required aircrew to aircraft ratio as this reservists might be recalled.

I could be wrong ... and often I am. But I don't think I am in this manner. Any CRAF/USTRANSCOM experts?
Yes, you're right. Only thing I'm not sure of is if they have to maintain qualified crew who are not also military reserves. They might end up needing to train some people quickly, cuz I know a whole bunch of drilling reserves who fly widebodies. Or maybe they just plan on parking planes to man CRAF in a hurry. If it came to that, the economy and air travel would probably be down anyway.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-14-2017, 03:28 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,262
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox View Post
You are referencing the CRAF and it doesn't really work that way.

The CRAF augments the military's capabilities. The military has to max out it's own aircraft, crews, and lift capability before the CRAF will be activated. Then there are certain levels or increments to which USTRANSCOM/SecDef can activate them. The participating airlines are given lucrative peacetime government/military business or contracts to offset costs for any potential activation. And by law, they're required to maintain crew ratios and a certain percentage of aircraft to be available if activated. I'm pretty sure this means they can't count an active reservist on their pilot list as part of the required aircrew to aircraft ratio as this reservists might be recalled.

I could be wrong ... and often I am. But I don't think I am in this manner. Any CRAF/USTRANSCOM experts?
I am not referencing CRAF at all. The bulk of the lift was contracted as charters by the US government. I flew many of those flights for my airline. The ramps at many US bases far from home were stuffed with airliners of every brand hauling troops and equipment. It was very lucritive flying for the airlines. If they don't have surplus pilots it's very difficult to fly on demand charters without impacting your normal operation.
CRAF is a very different animal and not what this discussion is about.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-14-2017, 08:10 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,621
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I am not referencing CRAF at all. The bulk of the lift was contracted as charters by the US government. I flew many of those flights for my airline. The ramps at many US bases far from home were stuffed with airliners of every brand hauling troops and equipment. It was very lucritive flying for the airlines. If they don't have surplus pilots it's very difficult to fly on demand charters without impacting your normal operation.
CRAF is a very different animal and not what this discussion is about.
In order to receive those contacts, you must be part of the CRAF. It is the benny for the airlines to agree to be recalled.

The normal operation of an airline will be affected depending on what level of CRAF is activated. The airlines can't renege on that.

What would the airlines be flying? Lucrative DOD contracts or normal ops?
PurpleToolBox is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Route66
American
6
04-08-2015 06:38 AM
ERJ135
American
26
02-26-2013 05:54 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
HSLD
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-14-2006 09:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices