T-45 fatal in Tellico Plains, Tennessee
10-16-2017, 11:59 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Recovering OBOGS addict
Posts: 385
Originally Posted by Grumble
OBOGS is a system, its in the Hornet, Super, Raptor, etc. It's failures are not unique to the airplane. A twin engine trainer for the Navy Jet pipeline buys you nothing more more cost. So you're saying the A-4 was a terrible airplane.....
Does everyone on here know that we don't use power carts and huffers for jet airplanes anymore? Batteries and APUs are pretty cool!
10-16-2017, 12:20 PM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Originally Posted by F4E Mx
Why yes, the US Navy version is heavier, slower, has less range, payload, and a lower service ceiling than most other Hawk versions. This after only 14 years in development for the Navy.
Wow...talk about a complete loss of internet respect
10-16-2017, 01:00 PM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
............AND CAN LAND ON AN AIRCRAFT CARRIER!
Wow...talk about a complete loss of internet respect
Wow...talk about a complete loss of internet respect
Whoopee. So could the F-86 and it didn't take 14 years of development to do it.
10-16-2017, 03:17 PM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Originally Posted by HuggyU2
Why do y'all even waste your time arguing with him?
There is no arguing here. It is like outing a troll.F-86s on aircraft carriers? Which version was that?
If you are trying to say the FJ Furys - well......those were different aircraft. Hmmmmm.....sounds familiar.
10-17-2017, 05:54 AM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
The FJ-2 was a derivative of the F-86E and the FJ-3 was a derivative of the F-86F.
Interestingly enough many parts of the original straight-wing FJ-1 were based on the P-51. North American then used the basically unchanged wing of the FJ-1 as the basis for the T-2 Buckeye trainer.
But you guys knew that, you guys know everything.
Interestingly enough many parts of the original straight-wing FJ-1 were based on the P-51. North American then used the basically unchanged wing of the FJ-1 as the basis for the T-2 Buckeye trainer.
But you guys knew that, you guys know everything.
10-17-2017, 10:38 AM
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,069
Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
Wow...talk about a complete loss of internet respect
Somewhere there might be an interesting story of where this ax came to be ground. Well, maybe not that interesting. But a story
10-17-2017, 12:40 PM
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Originally Posted by F4E Mx
The FJ-2 was a derivative of the F-86E and the FJ-3 was a derivative of the F-86F.
Interestingly enough many parts of the original straight-wing FJ-1 were based on the P-51. North American then used the basically unchanged wing of the FJ-1 as the basis for the T-2 Buckeye trainer.
But you guys knew that, you guys know everything.
Interestingly enough many parts of the original straight-wing FJ-1 were based on the P-51. North American then used the basically unchanged wing of the FJ-1 as the basis for the T-2 Buckeye trainer.
But you guys knew that, you guys know everything.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
