Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Air Force-Warrant Officer Pilots >

Air Force-Warrant Officer Pilots

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Air Force-Warrant Officer Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2018, 04:44 AM
  #41  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
The Navy experimented with bringing W’s back to the cockpit about ten years ago. Not sure whatever happened with the ones that got winged.
The Navy has experimented with warrants several times, including recently as you mentioned. The last time around they were restricted to airframes which do not do arrested landings. Made sense, the pointy-nose community historically generates the large majority of aviator Flags. The program ended, not sure if any warrants are still flying (I'm sure they all could have just knocked out a degree and picked up a regular commission no problem as winged, fleet-qualed people).


Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
To be fair, the Army flying Warrants are probably some of the most tactically proficient aviators in the military. Some of the chit I watched those guys pull off in Astan and Iraq would never be possible if asked if any other pilot in any other platform in any other service. (Go land, rearm and refuel yourself and get back in the fight). Those guys are legit, and the 160th is the best of the best of those guys.
Yup.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-05-2018, 11:03 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

It has been discussed before but Air Force Warrant officers is not a great idea.

First off, it would not solve the pilot shortage. If a major making close to six figures is running towards the airlines to be compensated better for his skill set, would a warrant making even less not figure out how much more he could make on the outside? Some people say it’s not about the money but that’s horse$$$$. Eventually it becomes about money to at least some degree, especially when you have a family to keep happy and feed. The warrant system works in the Army because, well, it’s a lot harder to become an airline pilot from the rotary world.

Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.

Now, if they really want to keep people? They need to provide bonuses comparable to year 1-5 salary as an FO AND address the QOL/morale issues.
C130driver is offline  
Old 05-05-2018, 12:14 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ugleeual's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 767/757 CA
Posts: 2,606
Default

The problem is the pilot training pipeline... it’s too small now. The only fix is to increase pilot training slots (new base) and increase number of FTU slots for fighters and transport/refuel/bombers... its a chicken and egg issue.
ugleeual is offline  
Old 05-06-2018, 04:46 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,187
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
It has been discussed before but Air Force Warrant officers is not a great idea.

First off, it would not solve the pilot shortage. If a major making close to six figures is running towards the airlines to be compensated better for his skill set, would a warrant making even less not figure out how much more he could make on the outside? Some people say it’s not about the money but that’s horse$$$$. Eventually it becomes about money to at least some degree, especially when you have a family to keep happy and feed. The warrant system works in the Army because, well, it’s a lot harder to become an airline pilot from the rotary world.

Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.

Now, if they really want to keep people? They need to provide bonuses comparable to year 1-5 salary as an FO AND address the QOL/morale issues.
I don’t know a single one of my peers (myself included) that wanted to leave, especially fighter aviation. However the future looked too bleak.... OPTEMPO, political BS, lack of flying, increasing importance of non-tacictal issues to career progression, staff tours, etc etc etc and the ever present instability of the home life. Guys getting out are looking for better, more stable options. The fact those options pay better is just icing on the cake.

If you would’ve told me I could’ve stayed in the cockpit, stayed tactical, and stayed in one place for the wife and kids I’d never leave. To further exemplify this look no further than guard/reserve squadrons. Your average 3-5 year FO at a major these days takes about a $500/day hit mil dropping to go into the squadron, but we do it because we enjoy the work and the people. Being able to leave squadron issues at the squadron when you go home and turn your phone off is what AD desperately needs, among many things.
Grumble is offline  
Old 05-06-2018, 05:19 AM
  #45  
Permanent Reserve
 
navigatro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,677
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
It has been discussed before but Air Force Warrant officers is not a great idea.


Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.

this is so ridiculous. Sounds like something out of an ACSC manual. Army senior NCO's supervise/manage as many people as AF Squadron CC's.
navigatro is offline  
Old 05-06-2018, 08:45 AM
  #46  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by navigatro View Post
this is so ridiculous. Sounds like something out of an ACSC manual. Army senior NCO's supervise/manage as many people as AF Squadron CC's.
They don't hypothetically employ nuclear weapons. Or have to decide whether or not to shoot that Russian or Chinese guy whose intentions are unclear. There is a difference.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-06-2018, 08:52 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Default

Originally Posted by navigatro View Post
this is so ridiculous. Sounds like something out of an ACSC manual. Army senior NCO's supervise/manage as many people as AF Squadron CC's.
They do supervise/manage and many do a good job at it, but ultimately it’s the Company or Batallion commander that calls the shots, or should be anyways.
C130driver is offline  
Old 05-06-2018, 11:11 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Posts: 1,657
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker15e View Post
It is astonishing the lengths that the USAF is willing to go to in order to avoid tackling the actual issues regarding leadership culture and mission focus that are actually driving pilots out the door.
shack

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
Kinda sorta. Around 2012 or so they denied continuation to a ton of dudes after 2nd passover. With absolutely zero warning. Want to say it was around 200 pilots.

It caused a lot of angst and lost faith and was definitely a retention issue for a few years after that. And probably still is an issue for folks finishing up their initial commitment.
Plus, how many RiFs and early retirements has the USAF offered since 2010? Then let's add to the pile: all the pilots who just did their job but didn't kiss all the right butts or fill the right (useless) squares and didn't get promoted to O-4/O-5 and left as a result. It defies all logic that the USAF showed the door to so many pilots who otherwise would have stayed and now they cry about not having enough. The situation reminds me of the perennial drinker who needs a liver transplant and thinks he should just move to the front of the line because well, he needs one. Sorry, but self inflicted wounds go to the back of the line buddy and this pilot shortage while not entirely self-induced certainly had plenty of help from "leadership" at big blue.
Han Solo is offline  
Old 05-06-2018, 11:22 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sonny Crockett's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: B777
Posts: 586
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
The Navy has experimented with warrants several times, including recently as you mentioned. The last time around they were restricted to airframes which do not do arrested landings. Made sense, the pointy-nose community historically generates the large majority of aviator Flags. The program ended, not sure if any warrants are still flying (I'm sure they all could have just knocked out a degree and picked up a regular commission no problem as winged, fleet-qualed people).




Yup.


Navy also had the NAVCAD program, two years of college (60 credit hours) right to AOCS and Flight Training, you needed to complete your degree by the 10th year of commissioning if you wanted to stay in.

Program pretty much was active 1986-1992. I think it still exists only for prior enlisted.
Sonny Crockett is offline  
Old 05-06-2018, 04:59 PM
  #50  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,211
Default

Originally Posted by Sonny Crockett View Post
Navy also had the NAVCAD program, two years of college (60 credit hours) right to AOCS and Flight Training, you needed to complete your degree by the 10th year of commissioning if you wanted to stay in.

Program pretty much was active 1986-1992. I think it still exists only for prior enlisted.
I recall it does still exist, or did a few years ago. But that commissions line officers, who have to get the degree and career-progress like anyone else. They are indistinguishable from someone commissioned from another source except the Navy granted some flexibility on when/how they get the degree.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HeavyLift
Cargo
391
12-20-2016 06:27 PM
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
vagabond
Foreign
9
07-05-2011 06:09 AM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
26
03-03-2008 11:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices