Air Force-Warrant Officer Pilots
#41
To be fair, the Army flying Warrants are probably some of the most tactically proficient aviators in the military. Some of the chit I watched those guys pull off in Astan and Iraq would never be possible if asked if any other pilot in any other platform in any other service. (Go land, rearm and refuel yourself and get back in the fight). Those guys are legit, and the 160th is the best of the best of those guys.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
It has been discussed before but Air Force Warrant officers is not a great idea.
First off, it would not solve the pilot shortage. If a major making close to six figures is running towards the airlines to be compensated better for his skill set, would a warrant making even less not figure out how much more he could make on the outside? Some people say it’s not about the money but that’s horse$$$$. Eventually it becomes about money to at least some degree, especially when you have a family to keep happy and feed. The warrant system works in the Army because, well, it’s a lot harder to become an airline pilot from the rotary world.
Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.
Now, if they really want to keep people? They need to provide bonuses comparable to year 1-5 salary as an FO AND address the QOL/morale issues.
First off, it would not solve the pilot shortage. If a major making close to six figures is running towards the airlines to be compensated better for his skill set, would a warrant making even less not figure out how much more he could make on the outside? Some people say it’s not about the money but that’s horse$$$$. Eventually it becomes about money to at least some degree, especially when you have a family to keep happy and feed. The warrant system works in the Army because, well, it’s a lot harder to become an airline pilot from the rotary world.
Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.
Now, if they really want to keep people? They need to provide bonuses comparable to year 1-5 salary as an FO AND address the QOL/morale issues.
#43
The problem is the pilot training pipeline... it’s too small now. The only fix is to increase pilot training slots (new base) and increase number of FTU slots for fighters and transport/refuel/bombers... its a chicken and egg issue.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,187
It has been discussed before but Air Force Warrant officers is not a great idea.
First off, it would not solve the pilot shortage. If a major making close to six figures is running towards the airlines to be compensated better for his skill set, would a warrant making even less not figure out how much more he could make on the outside? Some people say it’s not about the money but that’s horse$$$$. Eventually it becomes about money to at least some degree, especially when you have a family to keep happy and feed. The warrant system works in the Army because, well, it’s a lot harder to become an airline pilot from the rotary world.
Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.
Now, if they really want to keep people? They need to provide bonuses comparable to year 1-5 salary as an FO AND address the QOL/morale issues.
First off, it would not solve the pilot shortage. If a major making close to six figures is running towards the airlines to be compensated better for his skill set, would a warrant making even less not figure out how much more he could make on the outside? Some people say it’s not about the money but that’s horse$$$$. Eventually it becomes about money to at least some degree, especially when you have a family to keep happy and feed. The warrant system works in the Army because, well, it’s a lot harder to become an airline pilot from the rotary world.
Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.
Now, if they really want to keep people? They need to provide bonuses comparable to year 1-5 salary as an FO AND address the QOL/morale issues.
If you would’ve told me I could’ve stayed in the cockpit, stayed tactical, and stayed in one place for the wife and kids I’d never leave. To further exemplify this look no further than guard/reserve squadrons. Your average 3-5 year FO at a major these days takes about a $500/day hit mil dropping to go into the squadron, but we do it because we enjoy the work and the people. Being able to leave squadron issues at the squadron when you go home and turn your phone off is what AD desperately needs, among many things.
#45
It has been discussed before but Air Force Warrant officers is not a great idea.
Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.
Second, the Army operates in a very tactical environment where you can have technical experts flying helicopters around while the Captain/Major types make the operational decisions. In the Air Force, our flying mission is much more strategic and needs officers with their pink rear on the line making those strategic decisions - and those decision makers need to be tactical experts. It’s not about flying the plane, most can be taught to fly a plane. Think about all the various jobs (flying related) needed to run a Squadron. Those jobs require a level of organizational management and critical thinking that comes from some degree of higher education.
this is so ridiculous. Sounds like something out of an ACSC manual. Army senior NCO's supervise/manage as many people as AF Squadron CC's.
#46
They don't hypothetically employ nuclear weapons. Or have to decide whether or not to shoot that Russian or Chinese guy whose intentions are unclear. There is a difference.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
They do supervise/manage and many do a good job at it, but ultimately it’s the Company or Batallion commander that calls the shots, or should be anyways.
#48
Kinda sorta. Around 2012 or so they denied continuation to a ton of dudes after 2nd passover. With absolutely zero warning. Want to say it was around 200 pilots.
It caused a lot of angst and lost faith and was definitely a retention issue for a few years after that. And probably still is an issue for folks finishing up their initial commitment.
It caused a lot of angst and lost faith and was definitely a retention issue for a few years after that. And probably still is an issue for folks finishing up their initial commitment.
#49
The Navy has experimented with warrants several times, including recently as you mentioned. The last time around they were restricted to airframes which do not do arrested landings. Made sense, the pointy-nose community historically generates the large majority of aviator Flags. The program ended, not sure if any warrants are still flying (I'm sure they all could have just knocked out a degree and picked up a regular commission no problem as winged, fleet-qualed people).
Yup.
Yup.
Navy also had the NAVCAD program, two years of college (60 credit hours) right to AOCS and Flight Training, you needed to complete your degree by the 10th year of commissioning if you wanted to stay in.
Program pretty much was active 1986-1992. I think it still exists only for prior enlisted.
#50
Navy also had the NAVCAD program, two years of college (60 credit hours) right to AOCS and Flight Training, you needed to complete your degree by the 10th year of commissioning if you wanted to stay in.
Program pretty much was active 1986-1992. I think it still exists only for prior enlisted.
Program pretty much was active 1986-1992. I think it still exists only for prior enlisted.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post