Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
ANG vs Navy Route - Advice >

ANG vs Navy Route - Advice

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

ANG vs Navy Route - Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2018, 10:09 AM
  #21  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Default

Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh View Post
He's 22 years old. Fly low and fast. Blow stuff up.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ0EVXaaXug
Excargodog is offline  
Old 04-13-2018, 12:38 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,210
Default

Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh View Post
100% agree. But he's talking about Guard heavies or a Navy pilot slot. To me it's worth the shot to have a chance at something very few are lucky enough to do. Guard fighter vs AD fighter is a no brainer.
I'm curious myself as to pursuing a heavy slot or maybe a Navy AD slot. I had that exact choice decades ago and the USAFR recruiter couldn't understand why I had no interest in pursuing a heavy job. Unless it was in the landscaping business I had no interest in going to UPT for a heavy. But some folks don't want to pull G's, suck on a mask for hours, or wrench their necks out. They think that's crazy but the guys doing it think it's great.

ANG fighter trumps AD fighter for most guys. AD can be great but you're completely at the mercy of the service. Wife's pregnant? See in you six or 9 months baby. ANG? Much different story. Someone actually stays home when the unit deploys and sometimes things can be moved around so that a expectant dad can skip the deployment.

Fighters aren't heavies and heavies aren't fighters. Either you want fighters, and pursue them and your best odds of getting one are through a ANG fighter unit, or you don't.

Post 1990 pilot deaths -

C-17 3
C-5 0
C-130 18

B-52 3
B-1 0
B-2 0

A-10 17
F-15 18
F-16 46
F-22 1

There's a reason fighter pilots die at a higher rate. And that risk is part of the lure, the flying has significant threats to it much higher than normal flying. The death rate isn't the lure rather the tasks that require the skill, and aggression, of a fighter pilot are the lure.
Sliceback is online now  
Old 04-13-2018, 12:51 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes, rotary wing is highly possible. But there's also a very good chance of doing a fixed-wing IP tour, which will set you up for airlines. .
That's what I thought when I got Helos. But, its always the "Needs of the Navy." I tried for a training command billet after my sea tour. I guess I was too good at flying H-46s because I ended up being the helicopter NATOPS guy at a shore station.

It wasn't even listed on my preference sheet. They gave me two choices...stay where I was (the West Coast FRS) or go up the road to Pt. Mugu. Fortunately, we were critically short on fixed wing guys so I got to fly a lot in the King Air.

Fixed wing transition (in the olden days) was a board review deal. Virtually none of the guys who tried it got it unless they backdoored through a station King Air program.

For the OP...if you want to end up at the airlines, go Guard in a Tanker/C-17 squadron.
Packrat is offline  
Old 04-14-2018, 09:40 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Merle Dixon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Legacy FO, T-38 IP
Posts: 56
Default AD? Helzz No!

As others have typed, sweet Baby Jesus, go Guard. Have you pursued any ANG fighter units?
Merle Dixon is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 01:48 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: A shack in Kailua
Posts: 36
Default

Seems pretty simple. Do you want a guaranteed, predictable career that will set you up to fly with any major/legacy airline you want, or do you want to roll the dice?

Getting into a guard/reserve unit flying heavies is a sure path to any airline you want in this hiring environment. You can literally predict your entire career and it's the safe bet.

If you roll the dice, you may regret it. You may get helos and by the time you get out of the Navy or go into the reserves the hiring environment could be different and you may find yourself paying for your own RTP and going to a regional for a while. Alternatively, if you roll the dice and go navy, you could be in for a lot more fun and excitement than paying your dues at a guard squadron flying C17's. Almost everything in the Navy aside from P3's/P8's can and does land on carriers. Even if you get helos, C-2's or E-2's, you can get carrier qualified. You may be hauling mail and cargo whether it's the Navy or the Air Force, but doing it off a carrier is a lot more fun.

Me, personally? I knew from the beginning I was going full time/long term career military. I like the ocean too much to get stationed in Nebraska or Oklahoma or the other majority of air force bases that are inland in the middle of nowhere for most of my 20 year career. With that said, my counterparts who went AF ROTC and then went guard a decade ago and have flown KC135's and C17's part time are laughing all the way to the bank. They're all now captains at DL, AA and UA while I'm just now getting into the civilian game.
kbay hombre is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 02:19 PM
  #26  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by kbay hombre View Post
Seems pretty simple. Do you want a guaranteed, predictable career that will set you up to fly with any major/legacy airline you want, or do you want to roll the dice?

Getting into a guard/reserve unit flying heavies is a sure path to any airline you want in this hiring environment. You can literally predict your entire career and it's the safe bet.

If you roll the dice, you may regret it. You may get helos and by the time you get out of the Navy or go into the reserves the hiring environment could be different and you may find yourself paying for your own RTP and going to a regional for a while. Alternatively, if you roll the dice and go navy, you could be in for a lot more fun and excitement than paying your dues at a guard squadron flying C17's. Almost everything in the Navy aside from P3's/P8's can and does land on carriers. Even if you get helos, C-2's or E-2's, you can get carrier qualified. You may be hauling mail and cargo whether it's the Navy or the Air Force, but doing it off a carrier is a lot more fun.

Me, personally? I knew from the beginning I was going full time/long term career military. I like the ocean too much to get stationed in Nebraska or Oklahoma or the other majority of air force bases that are inland in the middle of nowhere for most of my 20 year career. With that said, my counterparts who went AF ROTC and then went guard a decade ago and have flown KC135's and C17's part time are laughing all the way to the bank. They're all now captains at DL, AA and UA while I'm just now getting into the civilian game.
Oh you can join the navy and still get stationed in Oklahoma. Ask me how I know. However, along with the P8 community, it is the best flying the navy can offer in terms of heavy, multipiloted aircraft. Wouldn’t bank on coming here though, there’s not many spots available
yardstick is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 06:46 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: A shack in Kailua
Posts: 36
Default

Originally Posted by yardstick View Post
Oh you can join the navy and still get stationed in Oklahoma. Ask me how I know. However, along with the P8 community, it is the best flying the navy can offer in terms of heavy, multipiloted aircraft. Wouldn’t bank on coming here though, there’s not many spots available
Yes, there is the E-6 flying at Tinker. I didn't mention this specifically because it's fairly rare. Only knew a few people in my career who went this route and they all seemed miserable (e.g., beerios at 10am every day off to avoid short call).
kbay hombre is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scout1969
Military
5
09-14-2017 06:08 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
5
05-19-2016 03:37 PM
Aussie Al
Flight Schools and Training
9
02-23-2010 10:22 AM
avanti
Flight Schools and Training
32
04-07-2008 11:01 PM
Harblar
Regional
15
03-05-2006 02:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices