Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
UAL vs SWA...what am I missing? >

UAL vs SWA...what am I missing?

Notices
Military Military Aviation

UAL vs SWA...what am I missing?

Old 03-02-2019, 01:49 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 68
Default UAL vs SWA...what am I missing?

I wanted to keep this off the Major board as it usually turns into a ****ing match over there. I’m a retiring O-5, have offers from both, live within 2-3 hour drive of domiciles for both, and class dates are a month apart. I’m well aware of the major differences that are usually discussed, but wondering if there is something out there that I’m missing as I make my decision. Any UAL or SWA folks care to share anything they wished they had known about before they started at either company? Thanks in advance!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bizkit is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 03:27 PM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

SWA has a relatively young pilot group, with IIRC a relatively linear age curve. Ie, your seniority will progress slowly.

UAL (like AA and DL) has a lot of retirements coming up. Plus a wider variety of flying on bigger planes, more opportunity for better, and varied, schedules and QOL. Your seniority progression will lead to more pay.

Much as I like SWA, all else being equal I think UAL is a clear choice, especially since you're older. You might never upgrade at SWA.

5 yr retirements for majors, FDX and UPS.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 04:16 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 1,122
Default

^^^^^ Exactly what he said.
viper548 is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 04:57 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 3,374
Default

Work where you live. No brainer. All other things being equal, UAL is a pretty sure bet due to their retirements.
SWA has been good to me and my family, but it is just another big airline. You really can’t go wrong with either.
e6bpilot is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 05:42 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,068
Default

Excellent problem to have, congrats.

My vote would be UAL, more variety.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 06:41 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Merle Dixon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Legacy FO, T-38 IP
Posts: 56
Default

Seniority progression is everything (QOL, time-off, schedule), everything. Another vote for UAL.
Merle Dixon is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 09:31 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,168
Default

Go sit in a 737 cockpit and ask yourself, would it be nice to have options or can I live with this until retirement?

Two leg four days to far away lands and nice hotels sleeping half the flight does not suck. If you want to do the multi leg domestic flying you can do that too. Wanna take the family non rev to pretty much anywhere? Won’t do that at SWA. SWA excels at productivity, anything else is UAL.
Grumble is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 10:22 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CLazarus's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: 777FO
Posts: 697
Default

If I'd gotten simultaneous offers from SWA and UAL, I would have taken SWA. SWA is still an excellent place to land. However, at UAL I will easily make a lot more money over my career than I could have at SWA, I project easily six figures more. Why? Faster upgrade - just four years in and I could hold CA. I am not bidding there for a year or two, because I like having whatever days off I want and I'm senior enough now to pick up premium trips to boot. Even with resumed growth, I can't imagine a CA upgrade at SWA in less than eight years nor having that much power over my schedule so soon. Oh, and I can change things up and bid WB too. In my case in particular, I put UAL's pass travel privileges to good use internationally - roughly $5-7k worth a year not even counting FC upgrades. Can't do anything remotely like it at SWA, at least not until they start flying to Europe. I would have taken SWA but I'm relieved now that I ended up at UAL. YMMV.
CLazarus is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 12:12 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Default

I’m at SWA, and it’s been great. If the choice were to live in base at SWA or commute to UA, I’d say choose SWA. If you plan to stay where you are and are choosing between driving to work for one or the other, I’d choose UA because of seniority progression driven by retirements instead of mainly just growth, plus variety of fleet types.

Of course anything can happen. An economic downturn could hurt, and SWA has a strong balance sheet. Or maybe they’ll get bought by Berkshire Hathaway and they screw things up. Maybe your base you’re planning to drive to goes away. Maybe UA or SWA merge with someone like JB or Spirit, and seniority progression could change drastically.

Even with the what-if’s my recommendation is the first paragraph.
Peacock is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 05:08 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 282
Default

Seniority = QOL.

Mandatory retirements in 5 years: SWA is 9%, UAL 18%. In 10 years SWA is 27%, UAL is 40%.

(I calculated this almost 2 years ago so it's no doubt better now.)
kme9418 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brakes Set
Major
52
05-13-2015 06:03 AM
DirectLawOnly
United
45
12-05-2012 05:39 AM
RiddleEagle18
Southwest
302
08-12-2011 07:12 AM
I_Love_Lamp
Major
103
03-29-2010 06:57 PM
av8r4aa
Major
82
11-29-2006 08:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices