Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

B-21 Raider Rollout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2022, 03:21 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 749
Default B-21 Raider Rollout

B21 Raider Rollout Livestream

I’m sure this will get relegated to Hangar Talk, but the Major section should get more eyeballs for those that may be interested.

On a related note, it’s an interesting tack for this to be the next strategic aircraft. I’m not well versed in the best course for future airborne conflict. I was under the impression that air warfare was gonna be more drone oriented. Anyone have some strategic opinions on either this aircraft or a forward looking strategy?
NotMrNiceGuy is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 03:57 PM
  #2  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

I put it on. Guessing a 4-star speech and a black flying wing though.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:16 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Posts: 677
Default

Looks like a B-2.
Pilot4000 is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:24 PM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Flyby was cool.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:36 PM
  #5  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

As long as Boeing doesn’t have any involvement it should be successful.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:42 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Position: I fly airplanes
Posts: 71
Default

On a related note, it’s an interesting tack for this to be the next strategic aircraft. I’m not well versed in the best course for future airborne conflict. I was under the impression that air warfare was gonna be more drone oriented. Anyone have some strategic opinions on either this aircraft or a forward looking strategy?[/QUOTE]

God forbid we ever have to go toe-to-toe in a real peer conflict, it is going to take a combination of manned, unmanned, and AI technology to compete and survive. Supposedly the B-21 can be operated without a pilot, and who knows what other crazy tech it has baked into it. When it comes to warfare in general and the weight of responsibility with taking human life, no level of AI or other technology can replace a human being in that decision loop (if you don’t believe me, ask Sarah Connor how things work out otherwise)
Panthertamer79 is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 04:51 PM
  #7  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,232
Default

Originally Posted by NotMrNiceGuy View Post
B21 Raider Rollout Livestream

I’m sure this will get relegated to Hangar Talk, but the Major section should get more eyeballs for those that may be interested.

On a related note, it’s an interesting tack for this to be the next strategic aircraft. I’m not well versed in the best course for future airborne conflict. I was under the impression that air warfare was gonna be more drone oriented. Anyone have some strategic opinions on either this aircraft or a forward looking strategy?
"Drone" is a very loose term. If you need to carry a lot of ordnance over a long range, that takes a large airframe... not a pred. B-21 may be optionally piloted, but does that make it a "drone"?

For significant assets, especially nuclear missions, you need the pilot option. Some missions will require human creativity and intuition... including future circumstances which we're not yet aware of. All high-cost assets will be at least optionally manned in our lifetimes. Lower-cost, expendable drones, autonomous wingmen, etc will out the inventory. Manned / unmanned teamwork can give the benefits of each, with each covering for the other's weakness. Some utility missions can operate 100% unmanned in certain environments: refuelers, ISR platforms, and probably cargo delivery.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 05:01 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
As long as Boeing the Air Force doesn’t have any involvement it should be successful.

fixed it for you. You obviously have no idea what causes all the problems on any acquisition program.
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 05:02 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by Pilot4000 View Post
Looks like a B-2.
Well, it’s replacing the B-2.
PNWFlyer is offline  
Old 12-02-2022, 05:32 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 158
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer View Post
fixed it for you. You obviously have no idea what causes all the problems on any acquisition program.
Congress...
Vettekid is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirBear
Major
113
01-28-2022 06:32 PM
Flyjets1
Your Photos and Videos
1
11-04-2010 02:40 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
18
07-10-2007 12:24 PM
Runner
Major
9
06-27-2007 09:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices