![]() |
Still confused, if they want 450 guys out (in those year groups) but are only offering VSP to 200, how are they going to get the other 250 to go? Without a RIF I mean?
|
Originally Posted by Sputnik
(Post 207467)
Still confused, if they want 450 guys out (in those year groups) but are only offering VSP to 200, how are they going to get the other 250 to go? Without a RIF I mean?
They claim they will have enough people wanting to take ADSC/LADSC waivers and leave. Color me skeptical. |
Sorry to ask, but aren't we still at war? Last time I checked, we were ....
'05 year group: That's a 1st Lt, right? Did we not see this train comming only 2 years ago?!?! I'm a simple man, but a troop cut in wartime? Is this making sense to anyone? Am I missing the "Big Picture," or are we just looking for a way to buy some more F-22s? |
Originally Posted by wickedsprint
(Post 207528)
They claim they will have enough people wanting to take ADSC/LADSC waivers and leave. Color me skeptical.
|
Clipper, you pretty much hit it on the head. With current manpower related costs (read: healthce), the AF has come to the conclusion that it cannot afford to keep current manning levels and recapitalize at a useful rate. It has chosen to cut the former in favor of the latter. The real kicker here is that even if the Air Force realizes all the savings it expects, recapitalization will continue at a sluggish pace at best. For instance, it will take decades just to get 150 new tankers in service. Air Force leadership of the past 15 years has utterly failed. IMHO, the Air Force will fail to fufill what it considers its basic core capabilities within the next decade. Our leadership has needed to inform our civilian leaders of the impending disaster for years, and they have not. Welcome to the train wreck. The lucky ones are being paid to get out of the way.
|
Originally Posted by wickedsprint
(Post 206336)
200 VSP slots
The breakdown of the numbers are as follows; 600 total need to leave 150 will come from the 05yr group 450 remain, up to 200 of which can get VSP if within the 12-15yr window. She also warned that SECAF can change whatever part of the program he wants, and this is just what they submitted to him, but this is likely what is going to go through. |
Originally Posted by EFD01
(Post 207632)
So, any ideas on what AFSCs will comprise the 600 officers the AF is looking to get rid of? I have a hard time believing there will be any 11s in there.
Also, while the money might seem like a great deal, if you retire from the guard or reserve you have to pay it back. So, invest it well I guess...if you qualify. |
Guys, this is totally food for thought, and nothing to base any decisions on, but, look forward another year. The AF clams they will be shedding another 14k people in FY '09 (for an ultimate goal of 316k total active duty). That will equate to ~2800 officers lost during the FY '09 Force Shaping. If you are denied seperation in FY '08, I'll bet you have a very good chance of seperation in FY '09. There is hope beyond FY '08 if you are denied. That's what I keep telling myself.
Again, total theory on my part, but it makes sense at least on paper. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by NoGoodName
(Post 207730)
Guys, this is totally food for thought, and nothing to base any decisions on, but, look forward another year. The AF clams they will be shedding another 14k people in FY '09 (for an ultimate goal of 316k total active duty). That will equate to ~2800 officers lost during the FY '09 Force Shaping. If you are denied seperation in FY '08, I'll bet you have a very good chance of seperation in FY '09. There is hope beyond FY '08 if you are denied. That's what I keep telling myself.
Again, total theory on my part, but it makes sense at least on paper. :rolleyes: I am listed in an AFSC as an overage by my yr group so I always wanna know my options. |
FY08 budgetary proposal submitted and approved by the Pres. specifically mentions future years of Force Shaping. Plus the AF has already obligated dollars for weapon system recapitalization with the assumption that the active duty strength will be down to ~316k in FY09.
In fact, they originally planned on 309k by FY13, but that will most likely change by a few thousand due to the Army and Marines plus up. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands