Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Tanker to Airline career progression >

Tanker to Airline career progression

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Tanker to Airline career progression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2006, 08:40 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default Tanker to Airline career progression

Hi. This is my first post in this forum though I've watched it for a while and am pleased that a military transition forum has developed. I'm currently in the KC-135R (I've noticed a few tanker guys out there) with 8.5 years or so left on my ADSC. Is there a preferred career progression in the USAF that will best serve an airline transition later in life. In other words, are airlines interested in MDS instructors or would AETC instructor time be just as valuable? Also, I developed my own logbook based on AFTO Form 781 entries. Am I best served by my homegrown logbook or my nice, professional Jeppesen logbook?
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 02-26-2006, 09:50 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roll Inverted and Pull's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Retired 767 Captain
Posts: 548
Default

PIC time in a big ol jet, lots of it! Log book..just fill it up...Good luck!
Roll Inverted and Pull is offline  
Old 02-26-2006, 04:28 PM
  #3  
nwafo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Transition

Hated the being in AETC, however, you cannot argue with the PIC time. I think AETC helped my resume stand out. The instructor time and evaluator time is good stuff. Just keep hacking at the PIC time. My $0.02.
 
Old 02-27-2006, 06:32 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by CAFB 04-12
Am I best served by my homegrown logbook or my nice, professional Jeppesen logbook?
CAFB 04-12, you were 2 classes before me. Anyway, the airlines will be just as happy with a flight records printout from your SARM office. Of course having a nice logbook won't hurt, but it's not a nessacity. Keeping 781's and/or creating your own log is good backup. You know how good the Air Force is at losing your stuff.
TankerDriver is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 07:51 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CAFB 04-12's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 428
Default

Were you at Columbus? (04-14?)
CAFB 04-12 is offline  
Old 02-28-2006, 09:52 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

I was for T-1's. I was at Moody for T-6's in 04-13.
TankerDriver is offline  
Old 03-04-2006, 08:33 PM
  #7  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: MD11 F/O
Posts: 6
Default

Originally Posted by CAFB 04-12
Hi. This is my first post in this forum though I've watched it for a while and am pleased that a military transition forum has developed. I'm currently in the KC-135R (I've noticed a few tanker guys out there) with 8.5 years or so left on my ADSC. Is there a preferred career progression in the USAF that will best serve an airline transition later in life. In other words, are airlines interested in MDS instructors or would AETC instructor time be just as valuable? Also, I developed my own logbook based on AFTO Form 781 entries. Am I best served by my homegrown logbook or my nice, professional Jeppesen logbook?
Most airlines want PIC time (Instructor or Aircraft Commander, not Check Airman) but they also like to see that you've had some leadership positions, like Check Airman, Chief of Such-and-Such. They don't like to see too much ground-pounding and paper-pushing. Stay current, fly in command and step up to the plate from time to time. And remember all your buddies ... they can help you or hurt you!
Phred is offline  
Old 03-05-2006, 09:17 AM
  #8  
johnny130
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was CAFB 04-14 (WarHawk).
As for log books, I keep one for my general av stuff then I use the rip from my flight records. I do this for the simple reason of not duplicating the hours logged. Some airlines don't care if its one log book and I've heard that they will dig sometimes dig if you are a Mil. dude with no RIP. It's just what I heard.
 
Old 03-20-2006, 10:40 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 74
Default

if one were to apply to tons of guard units, and was offered to go to upt for f16 in one, or a kc135/kc10 if hes really lucky, in another unit. which would you do? instant pic time? or wait a few years and start building the widebody pic teh airlines love
aspiring_pilot is offline  
Old 03-20-2006, 05:25 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by aspiring_pilot
if one were to apply to tons of guard units, and was offered to go to upt for f16 in one, or a kc135/kc10 if hes really lucky, in another unit. which would you do? instant pic time? or wait a few years and start building the widebody pic teh airlines love
It all depends on what you want. Do you want to fly fighters or heavies? As much as people think flying heavies is better for transitioning to the commercial world, most airlines won't necessarily give preference to someone with 2,000 hours of KC-135 time over someone with 2,000 hours of F-16 time. It may come down to other things on the resume that set the heavy pilot apart from the fighter pilot, or vice versa. Of course flying a heavy in the AF is going to be the closest thing to flying a commercial airliner stick and rudder wise.
TankerDriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jtaugher
Hangar Talk
4
04-30-2007 12:42 PM
sss_1981
Flight Schools and Training
5
06-12-2006 10:50 AM
deadstick
Flight Schools and Training
15
04-28-2006 05:02 PM
jnav
Flight Schools and Training
9
02-26-2006 09:52 PM
ryane946
Regional
15
02-16-2006 05:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices