Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
USAF voluntary officer recall (including retirees) >

USAF voluntary officer recall (including retirees)

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

USAF voluntary officer recall (including retirees)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2009, 01:33 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
zach141's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: holding pattern
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by C-17 Driver View Post
I sincerely hope it is not the "bait and switch." I would be willing to sign up if: 1) I stay in the C-17, 2)Stay at Dover, 3) have my reserve job still available in 3 years, and 4) Deploy ONLY when the squadron deploys. If signing up makes me eligible for a 179 day CAOC deployment, then the answer is no.
Both messages (two programs--one brings back retirees, on puts Reservists on AD) say right up front that they're for the purpose of filling UAV/ISR/rated staff slots to fight the war. You apply, they make you an offer. You accept, you're purely at their mercy assignment-wise. I don't think staying where you're at is an option under this program.

It's not a bait-n-switch, but it is AFPC smartly (or meanly, depending on your viewpoint) taking advantage of rough times to fill their hard to- but must-fill jobs with guys who can't get civilian jobs. Also, if you're an O-4/O-5, but you're junior with an airline and you can take mil leave and know your job is there when you're done, then it's pretty good money, I'd say.
Zach
zach141 is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 06:18 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 691
Default

This is from today's Air Force Association Daily Report and gives some information on what the recalled guys going to the MC-12 will be doing.

Curtain Goes Up on Project Liberty:

The Air Force plans to have the first of its newly acquired MC-12W intelligence-surveillance-reconnaissance aircraft deployed to Southwest Asia by April, Brig. Gen. Blair Hansen, director of ISR capabilities on the Air Staff, told reporters in the Pentagon Friday. The concept for these manned, medium-altitude platforms—which are known as Liberty Project Aircraft—came out of the Office of the Secretary of Defense ISR task force last year as a means to quickly bolster the overhead ISR assets already in Afghanistan and Iraq and, in particular, to relieve the heavy burden being placed upon on MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial vehicles in the war theater. LPA will specifically address the warfighter's demand for greater full-motion-video and signals intelligence coverage. Planned is a fleet of 37 aircraft. The first seven are based on the King Air 350 model, and the remaining 30 airframes on the King Air 350 Extended Range variant. All 37 aircraft are expected to be in the Air Force's hands by year's end, Hansen said. There will be two operational squadrons of 15 aircraft each and seven assets used stateside for training. The first eight LPA are used airframes undergoing modification. The remainder will be new airframes. (For more on the ISR burden, read High Stress Numbers Game)
Razor is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 09:25 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Herkdrv's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Mostly Herks. Soon to be Guppys and FRED
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
I can't believe this news has not been more celebrated by all the junior guys at FDX, and to a lesser extent UPS. many of the most junior guys at UPS came from the C-17 world and are the demographic the USAF would love to use for the staff jobs and bodies for the ISR jobs. O-4 pay equates to well over 100k at an airline job. This is a great way to ride out the recession. The needs of the Air Force be damned, this could really help out some folks.
Well if you like it so much why don't you go ahead and do it.
Herkdrv is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 09:28 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Herkdrv's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Mostly Herks. Soon to be Guppys and FRED
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by C-17 Driver View Post
I sincerely hope it is not the "bait and switch." I would be willing to sign up if: 1) I stay in the C-17, 2)Stay at Dover, 3) have my reserve job still available in 3 years, and 4) Deploy ONLY when the squadron deploys. If signing up makes me eligible for a 179 day CAOC deployment, then the answer is no.
I agree. I don't care what they promise. Once on active duty again you are at their mercy. The old classic response of needs of the Air Force trump any other promises made.
Herkdrv is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 05:39 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by Herkdrv View Post
Well if you like it so much why don't you go ahead and do it.

No thanks. I am extremely humble and appreciative to not be in a position facing a furlough. Guys facing furlough can apply and if accepted the USAF will offer them an assignment. At that point they can decide whether or not to take it.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 06:39 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Riddler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Left Seat, Toyota Tacoma
Posts: 593
Default

I saw another email and AFPC powerpoint today. Here's how it works:
- You submit an application to AFPC
- They determine where they want you to go
- You either accept or decline their offer. I have no idea if you get any say in your assignment.

Here's the kicker: you WILL NOT be eligible for promotion. That might not sound like a big deal, but being a passed over Capt/Maj definately puts you in the hot seat for a 1 year deployment. Just some food for thought - you'll be in a "normal" active duty squadron, but you won't be considered a normal squadron asset.

If I had the choice between a year of MPA and this, I'd take the MPA.
Riddler is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 06:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PittsDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 293
Default

The MC-12 should have an exciting mission where it counts. I am deploying this summer to go fly the MC-12s, so curious to see how it all pans out. As bad as the OPS tempo is now for active duty, it sure beats being furloughed or trying to find a job. One thing is for sure, mother AF does not forget anything. Those who bailed and went elsewhere, and then wanted to come back have for sure not got the dream assignments when they came back in. Hello UAV/ALO and all expense paid vacations to the beach with no ocean near by.
PittsDriver is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 07:29 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F15andMD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 792
Default

Here's the kicker: you WILL NOT be eligible for promotion. That might not sound like a big deal, but being a passed over Capt/Maj definately puts you in the hot seat for a 1 year deployment.
Does that mean no OPRs to be written for you? Obviously no PRF. OPR bullets are hard enough to invent these days.
Are they applying that to Reserve officers also?
I don't see the non-promotion being that big of an issue for retired dudes. They are only back for 48 months. When they ask you to do queep, say no thank you, I'm not promotable. Just doing the J.O.B.
F15andMD11 is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 01:41 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Razor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 691
Default

Here's some more on the MC-12 from the AFA. I like the part about the laser designator.

For guys that are considering going back in you could try to get into the U-2 program. They're always hiring and need pilots. Plus you get to fly the T-38 on the side.

Almost There: The Air Force has secured all but about $100 million of the $950 million required to fund the acquisition of 37 manned MC-12W intelligence-reconnaissance-surveillance aircraft and associated ground equipment, Brig. Gen. Blair Hansen, director of ISR capabilities on the Air Staff, told reporters during a Pentagon briefing Jan. 23. The remaining funds, which will cover the acquisition of the final seven aircraft, are expected to come this summer as part of the next war supplemental, Hansen said. The MC-12Ws will supplement overhead ISR coverage in Afghanistan and Iraq starting later this year. The aircraft's crew (two pilots and two sensor operators) will have the ability to communicate in real-time with ground forces via voice and video communications links. The first seven airframes, Beechcraft King Air 350 models, will feature an MX-15 high-resolution electro-optical sensor with laser pointer capability. From the eighth airframe on, the MC-12s will be based on the King Air 350 Extended Range design, which provides an additional hour-and-a-half of on-station time. They will also include a laser designator with a more accurate, narrower beam than on the pointer. This feature will "greatly" facilitate operations, said Hansen.
Razor is offline  
Old 01-27-2009, 06:03 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

You mean we are buying manned aircraft to help exploit the problems with the UAVs?
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris99
Military
88
12-19-2008 12:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices