Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Airborne Tactical Advantage Company (ATAC) >

Airborne Tactical Advantage Company (ATAC)

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Airborne Tactical Advantage Company (ATAC)

Old 08-06-2017, 02:28 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 281
Default

Unless there is a certain number of a specific aircraft in the world-wide fleet of that aircraft it is impossible to maintain them to an acceptable airworthiness standard. The reason is that the overhaul facilities of the engines and other components cannot economically maintain the parts, manuals, and test benches to overhaul the components. Even if you have a large warehouse of overhauled parts many of those parts will have time -limited components themselves which require retesting and recalibration after a certain number of years even though they have never been used. They cannot be recalibrated or checked in many instances because the test benches and manuals have been discarded. With the ejection seat that was mentioned I would hazard a guess Martin-Baker no longer maintains that model seat. They might, or might not, retrofit a seat for you but my sense is that it would cost a very large amount of money and the operator would incur a continuous maintenance program just for the seat. And we have not even begun to discuss if the airframe and engine manufacturer provide service such as updated airframe and engine manuals.
There is no other reason, except cheapness on the part of the operator, to keep using these antiques. Fly them at an airshow on a sunny day under an experimental certificate if you want to. Anything else, no.
F4E Mx is offline  
Old 08-06-2017, 09:34 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,977
Default

If it was being flown at an airshow, it would have be maintained under FAA regulations and operated the same. The stated purpose in the report was public use aircraft, which means they don't have to use certificated pilots or mechanics, in addition to all sorts of other regulations that don't apply. To a large extent, they can "do what they want" or not do what they want, when the aircraft is public use. Maybe something worth thinking about before taking such a gig, as you may be "on your own" more than you think...
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 08-09-2017, 06:20 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,169
Default

Originally Posted by resolater View Post
Were I a lawyer, which I am not, what possible objections would you have if a lawyer made a case for wrongful or negligence or manslaughter if the facts upheld such things in the cases of your colleagues and friends?

I started the discussion by asking if anyone knew for sure if this fleet of Hawker Hunters actually flew with live, reliable, properly functioning ejection seats, because of this fleet’s accident history. While all of you posting above were immediately defensive, distracting or accusatory, I didn’t understand why and this site is a method to chat about aviation. Pilots like you have died in a series of accidents in a specific fleet that have an unusual common element. Yet, every question is met with an attitude of “everything is fine, don’t talk about this, just go away”. Additionally, the NTSB witness summaries above point to a lot of inappropriate, unprofessional and pertinent actions, but even that doesn’t disturb anyone. I wonder why?

Of course I have been curiously digging around this subject and there is of course a reason for speaking out and posting information and questions here. This forum titled Airborne Tactical Advantage Company is visited by at least a couple of their former Hawker Hunter pilots who commented here, but they don’t seem to be too concerned about their colleagues who perished in disturbing circumstances surrounded by suspicious facts: Three highly-qualified and honorable Americans, highly-experienced, military-trained, combat-experienced pilots were each killed in the same ejection-seat-equipped Hawker Hunter fleet in 2003, 2012 and 2014, in a statistically astounding manner in very nonthreatening (not tactical type) flying circumstances in very good weather conditions. I was recently convinced by an unrelated Hunter pilot that the deadly 2014 Thomas Bennett death, chiefly due to a fuel system installation blunder, also happened in 2008 within the same fleet run by the same owner (as in 2003 at Pittston, incorrect vital maintenance work by improperly qualified and improperly supervised staff who got it wrong – then the dead pilot was blamed). The 2008 crashed Hunter was written off but a very fortunate pilot (former French Navy carrier qualified) also did not or could not eject, but somehow lived to tell about it (named as Pierre Yves Mejean). All of this indicates to me that something with this fleet is amiss, been covered up or is being ignored. It now sounds like all three in spades, especially the “ignore”, with just the reaction seen on this small forum. That too is statistically suspicious. Why so little to , with no concern at all for the pilots still flying this fleet today. So why all the dodging about this?

From the 2003 case alone, the NTSB report mentions: Undocumented maintenance. Undocumented engine. Undocumented aircraft. Unlicensed maintainers. Seeming lie or story about the aircraft logbook that would have been found with other paper documents if indeed it had been in the aircraft (see NTSB photos). Aircraft owner Andre Lortie swiftly sneaking out of the country from the scene right after the crash, flying away with the relevant unlicensed maintainers Tim Story and John Taylor. Same owner, maintainers and operation continued through 2 more crashes (plus France, reg. C-GZIC) and continues today with same fleet and same ejection seat – but nobody here acknowledges there is a point, a problem, or a possible cover up, while everyone here refused to engage with the facts? Same with 2008, 2014 and 2016….why?

What if each time they were needed, your airliner’s fire extinguishers failed to work? “Nothing to see here.”

Or what if all of Delta’s or Southwest’s or your airline’s alternate gear lowering systems failed each time it was needed? “What’s your point?”

What if a bunch of F-22 pilots were sickened or killed by their oxygen system, and some spoke out against the chain of command and risked court martial rather than fly again? “Move along, this subject is for mature pilots.”

What if the leader of the Blue Angels lost the trust of his team pilots and they wanted a replacement? “Sounds like you have an agenda.”

What if your fellow fighter pilots thought their ejection seat could save them when needed, but it couldn’t, and didn’t? And when it didn’t each time it could and should have, all the maintenance records disappeared from the scene, along with all the maintainers and the aircraft owner, in a real jiffy, and everyone said everything is just fine the way it is and let’s not talk about it? “I wish I was still flying with them.”

Isn’t it is fair to say that this is destined to happen again to another undeserving brother-in-arms soon, avoidably? Shall we mark my words now? This is simply alarming to me. Why to none of you?
You're non chalantly trying to make (so you say) idle chit chat about fatal accidents of guys many on this board called friends. Those of us who needed to learn from their accidents have.

You then continue with other instances of goings-on of events you clearly know nothing about. Were we having this conversation in person I'd politely invite you to **** off.
Grumble is offline  
Old 08-23-2017, 07:59 AM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 62
Default

Originally Posted by resolater View Post
Is it really possible all of these experienced pilots everywhere refused to eject themselves in obvious cases when they needed to, or is something else going on with seats here?
You're conspiracy is over. This guy punched yesterday:
Jet pilot rescued after ejecting off San Diego coast | fox5sandiego.com
From your posting history, you clearly have some sort of agenda.
Tandem46 is offline  
Old 08-14-2021, 07:57 AM
  #85  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 87
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Who has experience working with ATAC (I mean during SFARP, Red Flag, LFEs, etc...).
Does anyone on the forum work for them or know someone who does/has?

Airborne Tactical Advantage Company

USMCFLYR
Thread revive... any one here with updated info on ATAC?
icohftb is offline  
Old 08-14-2021, 03:19 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,835
Default

Originally Posted by icohftb View Post
Thread revive... any one here with updated info on ATAC?
I'm obviously not with them anymore but still know people who are, so I may be able to answer some general questions, or depending, be able to get updated information.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brownie
Cargo
200
03-05-2009 07:55 PM
Foxcow
Trans States Airlines
147
02-23-2009 09:08 PM
Splanky
Major
138
12-23-2008 09:03 AM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
8
10-30-2008 12:04 PM
BoilerPilot2007
Regional
16
09-25-2008 04:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices