![]() |
Originally Posted by chignutsak
(Post 1057442)
So it matters to you what people do behind closed doors? Keep your business to yourself. Once all the hoopla dies down, people will get back to work. I don't care to hear about my colleagues' exploits at work - hetero, gay, whatever. As for morals, keep your religion to yourself also. MYOFB.
We are already at war with one bunch of zealots.... |
Originally Posted by smugglersblues
(Post 1057424)
Much has changed, and BTW; I care---or used to care. Look-up the definition of amoral.
|
Originally Posted by chignutsak
(Post 1057442)
So it matters to you what people do behind closed doors? Keep your business to yourself. Once all the hoopla dies down, people will get back to work. I don't care to hear about my colleagues' exploits at work - hetero, gay, whatever. As for morals, keep your religion to yourself also. MYOFB.
|
Originally Posted by EasternATC
(Post 1057605)
Why did you bring religion into this conversation? Seems like a non-sequitur.
I prefer "hypocrisy"... that seems to match religion quite well. |
WOW...I thought that went away 20 years ago. I server as an openly gay person since 1992 and no one ever said a thing. Never...
|
Originally Posted by smugglersblues
(Post 1057424)
Look-up the definition of amoral.
I did....did you? Or did you mean "immoral?" Either way, led to an amusing discussion. |
No, I do mean amoral--- It's conceptual --can you dig it ? And as for the very petulant Homophile, Mr Chignutsak, (good name), now you can go back to work.
|
Originally Posted by Riddler
(Post 1057534)
Is having sex outside of marriage also immoral? According to the Bible, it surely is.
When is the last time that anyone took offense to flying with a single guy who does his best to get laid on every crew rest? PS: stay away from that Goat ! |
Originally Posted by smugglersblues
(Post 1057670)
No, I do mean amoral--- It's conceptual --can you dig it ? And as for the very petulant Homophile, Mr Chignutsak, (good name), now you can go back to work.
I suspect you're old enough to know that calling people names is unlikely means of persuading people to change their mind about something--though props for "homophile," points for orginality. As for the policy, it is what it is. As with any other military policy you disagree with, live with it or vote with your feet. |
Originally Posted by Grumble
(Post 1057789)
Exactly. Unless you're completely cluedo, gays have been serving for a long time with no major issues. My prediction, business will proceed as usual. 99% of people could care less, as long as you do your job. The 1% generally aren't tolerated by the rest and the problem tends to fix itself.
I'll take a solid wingman that's gay over a hetero dooshbag any day, because it doesnt f'ing matter. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:13 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands