Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
MV-22 Pilot - Mil to Civ - Roadmap advice? >

MV-22 Pilot - Mil to Civ - Roadmap advice?

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

MV-22 Pilot - Mil to Civ - Roadmap advice?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2019, 04:28 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
USMCv22's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
If he has interviews at Delta and AA, that indicates he has an ATP. To get an ATP he must therefore have 250 airplane PIC hours. If he has 250 airplane PIC hours he must have fixed wing time from somewhere (all we know is it wasn't regionals). So a little context on his other quals could help shed some light on that.



A dude who went through UPT and straight to CV-22s for 10 years is a whole lot different than a guy who flew CV-22s and then went to be a T6 instructor pilot or had a C12 tour, or something else racking up FW TPIC.


False dichotomy. 10 year pure V-22 dude(s) can and absolutely are making it to the Majors without fixed wing assignments, merely by flying a little Cessna on the side to gap that 250 airplane time. Though even that will be gone soon with the new FAA rule change which will credit V-22 (and AV-8 and F-35B) time towards that 250 ATP requirement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
USMCv22 is offline  
Old 03-18-2019, 06:36 AM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
USMCv22's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
If he has interviews at Delta and AA, that indicates he has an ATP. To get an ATP he must therefore have 250 airplane PIC hours. If he has 250 airplane PIC hours he must have fixed wing time from somewhere (all we know is it wasn't regionals). So a little context on his other quals could help shed some light on that.

A dude who went through UPT and straight to CV-22s for 10 years is a whole lot different than a guy who flew CV-22s and then went to be a T6 instructor pilot or had a C12 tour, or something else racking up FW TPIC.
No one is arguing that a candidate needs an ATP to get a job at an airline . But folks who have spent 10 (actually there is one dude who only did 8 years) flying nothing but the V-22 out of flight school have and are being interviewed/hired directly by the legacies. The inference I think you are trying to make is that a V-22 pilot must fly an entire "traditional" fixed wing assignment in order to meet the minimal 250 APLN PIC requirement. However, V-22 pilots are going VFR direct from Active Duty to the Legacies/Majors (except SWA) WITHOUT a "traditional" fixed-wing tour (some having the dreaded first-world problem of having to "choose" between majors). And those that are going to the regionals are spending <6-12 months (just enough time to check the 121 block) before getting the call.

To your point about the 250 PIC APLN time that 61.159 requires for guys without a FW tour, that gap is being easily bridged by dudes splitting time in a Cessna 150/172 on the weekends just to meet the "legality" of 61.159. However, there is an FAA rule change, soon to be published, that will allow V-22, AV-8, and F-35B (all the powered lift aircraft) time to count towards that 250 Airplane PIC requirement for an ATP (there is already a ruling out that allows MV-22B time to count towards a Commercial ME rating).

To the OP/Thread bumper, there have been 4 recent "pure" V-22 pilots (and that's just from the USMC, the only pool I have direct insight into) who have been offered an interview/gotten hired by a legacy (straight from Active Duty) in the last few months.

Southwest is the only expectation, and their director of hiring gives incoherent and ill-informed explanations as to "why" they are the only ones who discount the time. Though maybe not his fault, perhaps he has been severely misinformed as to the nuances of FAA powered lift rules and interpretations, and furthermore how the V-22 is operated. Delta, AA, and UA have no such biases, and to counter Rocky's points, none of the V-22 folks hired by these legacies (to include the "purebreds") have had any issues with training. (Rocky, fmr F-15 driver, says that SWA is not "desperate enough" to hire V-22 pilots yet )

Personally, I find flying NB aircraft in the 121 world a whole lot simpler than piloting a complex, multi-crew tiltrotor aircraft that must be expertly handled seamlessly through both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aerodynamic regimes in threat filled environments. But that's just me.

BL, if you are a V-22 driver (with ~1,000ish ACDR in the plane), use your GI bill or some other source of funding to get your ATP while still on AD and you have a good shot if getting a call directly from one of the Majors.

Alternatively, if you really want to save $$ or are <6 months out from your EAS with crickets, go ahead and do one of the Regional CTP courses (RTP not required) and get on with them so you can check the 121 block while you continue to enhance your application. You won't be there long.

Last edited by USMCv22; 03-18-2019 at 07:04 AM.
USMCv22 is offline  
Old 03-18-2019, 01:21 PM
  #43  
Line Holder
 
USMCv22's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by USMCv22 View Post
No one is arguing that a candidate needs an ATP to get a job at an airline . But folks who have spent 10 (actually there is one dude who only did 8 years) flying nothing but the V-22 out of flight school have and are being interviewed/hired directly by the legacies. The inference I think you are trying to make is that a V-22 pilot must fly an entire "traditional" fixed wing assignment in order to meet the minimal 250 APLN PIC requirement. However, V-22 pilots are going VFR direct from Active Duty to the Legacies/Majors (except SWA) WITHOUT a "traditional" fixed-wing tour (some having the dreaded first-world problem of having to "choose" between majors). And those that are going to the regionals are spending <6-12 months (just enough time to check the 121 block) before getting the call.

To your point about the 250 PIC APLN time that 61.159 requires for guys without a FW tour, that gap is being easily bridged by dudes splitting time in a Cessna 150/172 on the weekends just to meet the "legality" of 61.159. However, there is an FAA rule change, soon to be published, that will allow V-22, AV-8, and F-35B (all the powered lift aircraft) time to count towards that 250 Airplane PIC requirement for an ATP (there is already a ruling out that allows MV-22B time to count towards a Commercial ME rating).

To the OP/Thread bumper, there have been 4 recent "pure" V-22 pilots (and that's just from the USMC, the only pool I have direct insight into) who have been offered an interview/gotten hired by a legacy (straight from Active Duty) in the last few months.

Southwest is the only expectation, and their director of hiring gives incoherent and ill-informed explanations as to "why" they are the only ones who discount the time. Though maybe not his fault, perhaps he has been severely misinformed as to the nuances of FAA powered lift rules and interpretations, and furthermore how the V-22 is operated. Delta, AA, and UA have no such biases, and to counter Rocky's points, none of the V-22 folks hired by these legacies (to include the "purebreds") have had any issues with training. (Rocky, fmr F-15 driver, says that SWA is not "desperate enough" to hire V-22 pilots yet )

Personally, I find flying NB aircraft in the 121 world a whole lot simpler than piloting a complex, multi-crew tiltrotor aircraft that must be expertly handled seamlessly through both fixed-wing and rotary-wing aerodynamic regimes in threat filled environments. But that's just me.

BL, if you are a V-22 driver (with ~1,000ish ACDR in the plane), use your GI bill or some other source of funding to get your ATP while still on AD and you have a good shot if getting a call directly from one of the Majors.

Alternatively, if you really want to save $$ or are <6 months out from your EAS with crickets, go ahead and do one of the Regional CTP courses (RTP not required) and get on with them so you can check the 121 block while you continue to enhance your application. You won't be there long.
Of course I meant SWA is the only "exception," not "expectation."
USMCv22 is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 03:32 PM
  #44  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 10
Default Stay in and get your 20!

I am sorry to say. But the best advice is to stay in for those 9 short years. the worst is behind you.
Joshua19 is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 03:47 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
USMCv22's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 82
Default

Well, since the OP was 3 years ago, I think he’s down to 6.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
USMCv22 is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 04:06 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 310
Default

Originally Posted by Joshua19 View Post
I am sorry to say. But the best advice is to stay in for those 9 short years. the worst is behind you.
In this hiring environment? Especially now that MV-22 time has some value and counts 90% for fixed wing ME for the majors? 9 years is a small eternity where they’ll miss the hiring wave.
Phoenix21 is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 05:20 PM
  #47  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by Joshua19 View Post
I am sorry to say. But the best advice is to stay in for those 9 short years. the worst is behind you.
In this climate? No. Get your seniority now, and definitely finish in the reserves just for the backup employment and retirement pension/medical.

Unless your goal in life is to be a general or flag officer. We do actually need some folks who are motivated to lead for the long haul.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-10-2019, 06:20 PM
  #48  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,490
Default

Originally Posted by Phoenix21 View Post
In this hiring environment? Especially now that MV-22 time has some value and counts 90% for fixed wing ME for the majors? 9 years is a small eternity where they’ll miss the hiring wave.
^^^^THAT

Next three years or so you’ll be on the leading edge of the hiring wave. Nine years out you’ll probably get hired alright, but you’ll be junior for a LONNNNGGG time.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 02-19-2020, 11:10 AM
  #49  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by USMCv22 View Post
Though even that will be gone soon with the new FAA rule change which will credit V-22 (and AV-8 and F-35B) time towards that 250 ATP requirement.
I’ve been hearing about this rule change for over a year now, any word on when it might actually come to fruition?
Flyingtank is offline  
Old 02-19-2020, 12:24 PM
  #50  
Occasional box hauler
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,682
Default

Originally Posted by Flyingtank View Post
I’ve been hearing about this rule change for over a year now, any word on when it might actually come to fruition?
Can’t comment on the Osprey, but a guy in my new hire class had only Harrier and F35 time. The FAA didn’t give home any grief and that was several years ago.
tnkrdrvr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jumping ship
Military
17
03-23-2016 11:06 PM
aaronjmsb
Flight Schools and Training
20
01-29-2016 01:45 PM
manilo52
Career Questions
5
06-21-2015 04:05 PM
codycm
Major
39
06-23-2006 10:24 PM
tigermagicjohn
Flight Schools and Training
9
01-23-2006 08:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices