Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Other
Commutair jet deliveries halted? >

Commutair jet deliveries halted?

Search
Notices
Other Regional Airlines

Commutair jet deliveries halted?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2017, 03:52 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 30
Default Commutair jet deliveries halted?

I'm hearing from a very reliable source that Commutair is no longer taking jet deliveries acccording to the FAA and they are now limited to 20 total ERJs. What's going on?
C172 is offline  
Old 06-24-2017, 04:32 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 296
Default

Originally Posted by C172 View Post
I'm hearing from a very reliable source that Commutair is no longer taking jet deliveries acccording to the FAA and they are now limited to 20 total ERJs. What's going on?
Which flight attendant told you that?

Latest email to the pilots indicates we are on track to continue taking deliveries of the 40 145s, and actively negotiating with United for an additional 21 145s to replace the DHC-8 fleet. With the training bubble shrinking they have doubled the size of the latest upgrade class. They also say they will increase hiring soon but I'll believe that when I see it.
Saucy Dingo is offline  
Old 06-24-2017, 04:42 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Saucy Dingo View Post
Which flight attendant told you that?

Latest email to the pilots indicates we are on track to continue taking deliveries of the 40 145s, and actively negotiating with United for an additional 21 145s to replace the DHC-8 fleet. With the training bubble shrinking they have doubled the size of the latest upgrade class. They also say they will increase hiring soon but I'll believe that when I see it.
It wasn't from a flight attendant. I'll leave it at that. I don't blame them when our D:0 is like 57% and A:14 is 60% for the month.
C172 is offline  
Old 06-24-2017, 04:49 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 296
Default

Originally Posted by C172 View Post
It wasn't from a flight attendant. I'll leave it at that. I don't blame them when our D:0 is like 57% and A:14 is 60% for the month.
1. The FAA doesn't care about performance.
2. That's what you'll see when most of your flights are out of EWR.
Saucy Dingo is offline  
Old 06-24-2017, 08:35 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by C172 View Post
I'm hearing from a very reliable source that Commutair is no longer taking jet deliveries acccording to the FAA and they are now limited to 20 total ERJs. What's going on?
So I guess that plane from IGN to ALB on 6/22 that was on the flow board is not complying with your "reliable" source.
jacburn is offline  
Old 06-24-2017, 12:41 PM
  #6  
Inverted
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: CL65 CA
Posts: 536
Default

Very ironic we just got an email from the COO last night regarding the jet deliveries and how they are trying to negotiate another 21 jets and you come on here with this flamebait. Sad, find something better to do with your time
aviatorpr is offline  
Old 06-24-2017, 12:50 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 123
Default

Yeah I'm not buying it… Tell me again why the FAA would care?
Cirrusly is offline  
Old 06-24-2017, 08:56 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: lav dumper
Posts: 707
Default

I've also heard that. I heard it was because of a safety concern. 2 stories that are floating around and don't really want to detail on a public forum, so I'll be brief. 1st story was a jumpseater was upfront on a C5 flight on the 145, both pilots were distracted looking at charts with the thrust at idle, lost the speed, got the shaker, pilots were not initiating a recovery and the jumpseater pushed the thrust to max...jumpseater was a 145 pilot from another airline. I've heard this from a guy that knows said jumpseater.

2nd story that is floating around was with a United guy jumpseating with a seat in the back on the 145. The pilots proceed to initiate the takeoff with the flaps at 0, flaps go down to 9 in the middle of the takeoff, and jumpseater and the C5 CA have a huge blowout at the end of the flight after he asked what was with the flaps. As they say there are two sides to every story and then there's the truth. So even if the truth is somewhere in between....that is still kind of scary. Supposedly FAA was contacted in both instances.
DirkDiggler is offline  
Old 06-25-2017, 03:54 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Posts: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Cirrusly View Post
Yeah I'm not buying it… Tell me again why the FAA would care?
Safety concerns.
C172 is offline  
Old 06-25-2017, 04:29 AM
  #10  
Passed Recurrent
 
PosRateGearUp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: FO
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler View Post
...I've heard this from a guy that knows said jumpseater.

2nd story that is floating around...
Wow, thanks for the credible input guy! I know a guy who knows a guy who works for the government that said chemtrails are real.

Factually, neither of these events you've described are found in any of our ASAP or incident reports.

Also, the FAA has no say in how many E145s a company can operate. They either approve our op spec, or they don't. In this case, it's approved and we are still taking delivery.
PosRateGearUp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fins Up
Major
245
04-01-2014 03:39 AM
Ultralight
Regional
88
06-27-2013 10:06 AM
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
orvil
American
304
12-06-2011 10:32 AM
Lennon
JetBlue
0
07-01-2005 07:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices