Great Lakes' Part 135 plan
#342
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Precarious
Posts: 378
#343
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 962
Regional airlines back in the 90's were all operating under 135 ruies correct? If great lakes was approved for it would that not cause a domino effect for others to try and get approved as well? I could be wrong i just thought great lakes wouldn't be the only exception to the rule.
#346
Regional airlines back in the 90's were all operating under 135 ruies correct? If great lakes was approved for it would that not cause a domino effect for others to try and get approved as well? I could be wrong i just thought great lakes wouldn't be the only exception to the rule.
#347
Regional airlines back in the 90's were all operating under 135 ruies correct? If great lakes was approved for it would that not cause a domino effect for others to try and get approved as well? I could be wrong i just thought great lakes wouldn't be the only exception to the rule.
There already are plenty of 135s providing EAS, but they smartly use smaller aircraft (as intended) to do this.
#350
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: 320 Captain
Posts: 634
In the mid 90's I was flying the Brasilia with 30 seats under part 135 all over the rocky mountian region (ranging from Texas to California and pretty much every state in between up and down the Rockies ). Multiple states usually in the same day with no dispatcher, and filing my own flight plans with Flight Service. And the flight training was all in the aircraft, middle of the night in RAP and with no IOE either. first flight with passengers on board was with a regular line Captain, from RAP to DEN (Stapleton) and a whopping total of roughly 7-8 hours in the right seat.
Can't say I miss those days.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post