Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Part 135 age limit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2022, 08:26 AM
  #11  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by Peabody17 View Post
Nice statement…and completely FALSE! One might even say “a lie”.
It would be helpful to the uninformed as to which is false. Netjets or others.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 11-07-2022, 09:09 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
B727DRVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Standing in front of the tank with a shopping bag
Posts: 918
Question Correct.. a ton over 70 pilots there..

Originally Posted by Peabody17 View Post
Nice statement…and completely FALSE! One might even say “a lie”.
Truth, Peabody!

I have heard rumors thought that NetJets Management WANTED an age 70 Maximum, but obviously that would have to be negotiated with NJASAP.. Is that just a rumor?
B727DRVR is offline  
Old 11-07-2022, 09:52 AM
  #13  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,002
Default

Originally Posted by aeroengineer View Post
I tried to attach the actual memo but the APC gods frowned, and I don't remember where I found it, so I cut and paste. Interested on the take of others.
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...rpretation.pdf

There's your source.

There are four means of understanding the regulation, which are legally defensible and have authority.

The first are Federal Register preambles, when the regulation is enacted.

The second are the FAA Chief Legal Counsel letters of interpretation. The FAA administrator is authorized, and mandated by an Act of Congress to regulate aviation within the United States; the Administrator delegates interpretative authority of the regulation to the Chief and Regional legal counsel. Note: this authority does not extend to the FSDO level.

The third is the regulation itself, as codified in the CFR.

The fourth are administrative law judge rulings, which do not interpret the regulation nor define it, and are not precedent-setting, but do lend insight into the application of the regulation in specific circumstances.

What you referenced is an FAA Chief Counsel letter of interpretation.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 11-07-2022, 10:19 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
aeroengineer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...rpretation.pdf

There's your source.

There are four means of understanding the regulation, which are legally defensible and have authority.

The first are Federal Register preambles, when the regulation is enacted.

The second are the FAA Chief Legal Counsel letters of interpretation. The FAA administrator is authorized, and mandated by an Act of Congress to regulate aviation within the United States; the Administrator delegates interpretative authority of the regulation to the Chief and Regional legal counsel. Note: this authority does not extend to the FSDO level.

The third is the regulation itself, as codified in the CFR.

The fourth are administrative law judge rulings, which do not interpret the regulation nor define it, and are not precedent-setting, but do lend insight into the application of the regulation in specific circumstances.

What you referenced is an FAA Chief Counsel letter of interpretation.
Ahh Thanks,

So is it correct that the described age restrictions only apply to the operations as shown in the memo as listed below?

Also, how would one define "scheduled" in this context? So 135 charter as I see it would not be considered scheduled?

(i) Scheduled international air services carrying passengers in turbojet powered airplanes;
(ii) Scheduled international air services carrying passengers in airplanes having a passenger-seat configmation of more than nine passenger seats, excluding each crewmember seat;
(iii) Nonscheduled international air transportation for compensation or hire in airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of more than 30 passengers seats, excluding each crewmember seat; or
(iv) Scheduled international air services, or nonscheduled international air transportation for compensation or hire in airplanes having a payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds.
aeroengineer is offline  
Old 11-07-2022, 01:14 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Poolside
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by B727DRVR View Post
I have heard rumors thought that NetJets Management WANTED an age 70 Maximum, but obviously that would have to be negotiated with NJASAP.. Is that just a rumor?
You are correct that management wanted (and wants) a mandatory retirement age (MRA), but there currently is none for an operator like NetJets flying unscheduled under Parts 91K and 135. However, as you can see from this article (https://www.flyingmag.com/netjets-pi...ry-retirement/), there was an effort a few years ago by management and supported by the union (I don't know why) to institute an MRA of 70. The effort to get this through Congress failed, so there is no MRA at NetJets. As someone else said, we still have pilots in their 70's, much to the chagrin of management.

It's important to point out that NJ management's effort, as outlined in the article, would ONLY have applied to NetJets US, and not to NetJets Europe or to EJM. Thus, it is clear it is about economics and NOT safety.
Peabody17 is offline  
Old 11-07-2022, 02:14 PM
  #16  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,002
Default

Originally Posted by aeroengineer View Post
So is it correct that the described age restrictions only apply to the operations as shown in the memo as listed below?
The regulation spells it out clearly. See 14 CFR 61.3(j):

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-1...A/section-61.3
(j) Age limitation for certain operations.

(1) Age limitation. No person who holds a pilot certificate issued under this part may serve as a pilot on a civil airplane of U.S. registry in the following operations if the person has reached his or her 60th birthday or, in the case of operations with more than one pilot, his or her 65th birthday:

(i) Scheduled international air services carrying passengers in turbojet-powered airplanes;

(ii) Scheduled international air services carrying passengers in airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of more than nine passenger seats, excluding each crewmember seat;

(iii) Nonscheduled international air transportation for compensation or hire in airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of more than 30 passenger seats, excluding each crewmember seat; or

(iv) Scheduled international air services, or nonscheduled international air transportation for compensation or hire, in airplanes having a payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds.

(2) Definitions.

(i) “International air service,” as used in this paragraph (j), means scheduled air service performed in airplanes for the public transport of passengers, mail, or cargo, in which the service passes through the airspace over the territory of more than one country.

(ii) “International air transportation,” as used in this paragraph (j), means air transportation performed in airplanes for the public transport of passengers, mail, or cargo, in which the service passes through the airspace over the territory of more than one country.


Originally Posted by aeroengineer View Post
Also, how would one define "scheduled" in this context? So 135 charter as I see it would not be considered scheduled?
I don't know how you see it, and cannot comment with respect to that . The regulation, however, spells it out.

14 CFR 110.2 defines both on-demand, and scheduled operations.

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-1.../section-110.2
On-demand operation means any operation for compensation or hire that is one of the following:

(1) Passenger-carrying operations conducted as a public charter under part 380 of this chapter or any operations in which the departure time, departure location, and arrival location are specifically negotiated with the customer or the customer's representative that are any of the following types of operations:

(i) Common carriage operations conducted with airplanes, including turbojet-powered airplanes, having a passenger-seat configuration of 30 seats or fewer, excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or less, except that operations using a specific airplane that is also used in domestic or flag operations and that is so listed in the operations specifications as required by § 119.49(a)(4) of this chapter for those operations are considered supplemental operations;

(ii) Noncommon or private carriage operations conducted with airplanes having a passenger-seat configuration of less than 20 seats, excluding each crewmember seat, and a payload capacity of less than 6,000 pounds; or

(iii) Any rotorcraft operation.

(2) Scheduled passenger-carrying operations conducted with one of the following types of aircraft with a frequency of operations of less than five round trips per week on at least one route between two or more points according to the published flight schedules:

(i) Airplanes, other than turbojet powered airplanes, having a maximum passenger-seat configuration of 9 seats or less, excluding each crewmember seat, and a maximum payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or less; or

(ii) Rotorcraft.

(3) All-cargo operations conducted with airplanes having a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or less, or with rotorcraft.
Scheduled operation means any common carriage passenger-carrying operation for compensation or hire conducted by an air carrier or commercial operator for which the certificate holder or its representative offers in advance the departure location, departure time, and arrival location. It does not include any passenger-carrying operation that is conducted as a public charter operation under part 380 of this chapter.
Do you understand common carriage? Noncommon carriage? Private carriage? Holding out?

If you want to expand on the definitions above, the regulatory link will include citations, with links, below the regulation, to the Federal Register; read the comments and preambles there for explanation behind the rationale for the regulation (eg: https://www.federalregister.gov/docu...ilot-age-limit, etc).
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 11-12-2022, 08:34 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
B727DRVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Standing in front of the tank with a shopping bag
Posts: 918
Talking How convenient, 😂!

Originally Posted by Peabody17 View Post
You are correct that management wanted (and wants) a mandatory retirement age (MRA), but there currently is none for an operator like NetJets flying unscheduled under Parts 91K and 135. However, as you can see from this article (https://www.flyingmag.com/netjets-pi...ry-retirement/), there was an effort a few years ago by management and supported by the union (I don't know why) to institute an MRA of 70. The effort to get this through Congress failed, so there is no MRA at NetJets. As someone else said, we still have pilots in their 70's, much to the chagrin of management.

It's important to point out that NJ management's effort, as outlined in the article, would ONLY have applied to NetJets US, and not to NetJets Europe or to EJM. Thus, it is clear it is about economics and NOT safety.
“…..would ONLY have applied to NetJets US, and not to NetJets Europe or to EJM. Thus, it is clear it is about economics and NOT safety.”

How convenient…. I’m shocked that NJASAP would support that.. Glad that it didn’t become law for just Netjets, but not everyone else..
B727DRVR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pilotr
Part 135
3
05-31-2017 01:54 PM
AtlCSIP
Career Questions
5
05-05-2016 10:49 PM
Airsupport
Regional
84
02-06-2010 09:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices