Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Part 135 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/part-135/)
-   -   Ameriflight (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/part-135/17324-ameriflight.html)

Hawaii808 08-22-2020 06:16 PM


Originally Posted by USMCFLYR (Post 3114205)
You may THINK that is the rule because you have probably surrounded yourself with airline wanna-bes, but aviation is a big world and there are plenty who have other ideas of flying than your “big three”. Where this particular pilot would head right back to their regional when (and if) the recall comes, well....that is a choice the company will have to make based on what they think this pilot could provide the company based on either a short term plan or longer.


1. going from a regional to part 135 single pilot cargo operation isn’t as easy as he may think.
2. Never say you would be in for the long haul if you have never worked at said operator. Sure, say it in an interview in a much more professional way, but to proclaim it when facing a furlough or complete job loss is short sighted.
3. Ameriflight is a job for the young time builders, not for the middle aged regional captain. I did it for 3 years over a decade ago. Got a lot of great experience from it, but I’m not gonna go back to it ever again.

Meep 08-23-2020 07:03 PM


Originally Posted by Hawaii808 (Post 3114257)
1. going from a regional to part 135 single pilot cargo operation isn’t as easy as he may think.
2. Never say you would be in for the long haul if you have never worked at said operator. Sure, say it in an interview in a much more professional way, but to proclaim it when facing a furlough or complete job loss is short sighted.
3. Ameriflight is a job for the young time builders, not for the middle aged regional captain. I did it for 3 years over a decade ago. Got a lot of great experience from it, but I’m not gonna go back to it ever again.

Same, that’s by far the most difficult flying I’ve done.

ZippyNH 08-24-2020 10:01 AM


Originally Posted by Hawaii808 (Post 3114257)
1. going from a regional to part 135 single pilot cargo operation isn’t as easy as he may think.
2. Never say you would be in for the long haul if you have never worked at said operator. Sure, say it in an interview in a much more professional way, but to proclaim it when facing a furlough or complete job loss is short sighted.
3. Ameriflight is a job for the young time builders, not for the middle aged regional captain. I did it for 3 years over a decade ago. Got a lot of great experience from it, but I’m not gonna go back to it ever again.

Some very good points.
The fact that the VAST MAJORITY of the cargo at AMF is now "no touch" makes it easier for an older pilot to do feeder cargo. Not saying it's much easier than it was 20 years ago, but not having to push you own cargo to the door at outstations for a driver is a big help.
Yes, it's a different kind of flying, oddly rewarding for some, with lots of hand flying, down in the weather. Intense at times, typically with older, less well equipped equipment.
Honestly it's the type of job that suits some people well...but is a nightmare for others. Much more of a blue-collar type of flying job, and if it's in a location you want to be in, it can honestly be a good job (perhaps a spouse who loves their job and you hate commuting, or like small town rural life on an "outbased" route).
Will you ever make HUGE money? No, but for many people finding the right mix of QOL, location, money and time is more important.
Would I suggest a typical RJ pilot move a family half way across the country for a job like this? Not likely unless they really disliked the regional lifestyle, and REALLY want something totally different.
Yes, you will get you shirt dirty, get soaked in the rain, freeze you butt off in winter, work some odd hours, often on minimum rest. What you get is typically a schedule you know months in advance, and typically all day or all night at home with the weekends off...not having to deal with terminals, etc is a plus IMHO.
​​​​​​EVERY job has BS, it's just a matter of finding the flavor of BS that you can tolerate.
Honestly, after years of corporate flying, I ended up going back to cargo for the stability. Cargo tends to change much more slowly than passangers when the eccnomy goes up or down....
​​​

Hawaii808 08-24-2020 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by ZippyNH (Post 3115026)
Some very good points.
The fact that the VAST MAJORITY of the cargo at AMF is now "no touch" makes it easier for an older pilot to do feeder cargo.
​​​

Honestly, that’s pretty awesome!
Cargo is definitely a more stable job, but I would aim a little higher than AMF. Runs get cut and changed all the time on the part 135 side and commuting at AMF is almost impossible. To each his own though. Being home every night is awesome and I’ve pretty much been able to do that my entire career (minus the night cargo I did, but I was home during the day).

fulldeflection 09-02-2020 04:13 PM

How so?
 

Originally Posted by Meep (Post 3114746)
Same, that’s by far the most difficult flying I’ve done.

What made the flying so difficult? The equipment? I've heard Ameriflight's birds are old with old avionics.

As Briefed 09-02-2020 05:09 PM

Avionics? Radios? The pipers use smoke signals from the engines. HSIs? Some planes didn’t have a heading bug. After decades the planes didn’t exactly demonstrate positive flight characteristics. You are single pilot in all the weather of the local area 5 days a week on terrible sleep. This will be the most challenging flying most will ever do who do it.

+1 Your seat is sopping wet and so is your ass for your whole “day” If it rained.

ZippyNH 09-02-2020 07:06 PM


Originally Posted by As Briefed (Post 3121341)
Avionics? Radios? The pipers use smoke signals from the engines. HSIs? Some planes didn’t have a heading bug. After decades the planes didn’t exactly demonstrate positive flight characteristics. You are single pilot in all the weather of the local area 5 days a week on terrible sleep. This will be the most challenging flying most will ever do who do it.

+1 Your seat is sopping wet and so is your ass for your whole “day” If it rained.

All things change with time...cargo has changed lots in the last 10-20 years....
As is typical in cargo, if you have "shiney jet syndrome" you need not apply...you won't be flying new stuff, and rarely will you have a plane with a "pretty" paint job...but work is steady, and we were and are still doing limited hiring, no furloughs as of yet...we still have pilots flowing up to companies like UPS, Omni, etc....
All of the Piper's are in the boneyard....never flown a be-99, so I can't vouch for the door seals on the crew doors, but haven't heard of anyone complaining about wet seats....
Most of the fleet, guessing 65-75% are gps equipped, all received ADS-b upgrades as required.....
Yes... cargo can be a bit of a lifestyle, and some enjoy the free time, others like the time building routes that often are minimum rest....
Challenging weather into some second rate airports where you might be the one of the biggest planes to land all day? Perhaps.
Weather.... depends...Miami FL, Lansing MI, Burbank/Ontario CA, Salt lake City Utah, Portland OR, or Puerto Rico (lots more, but you get the idea) all have their different challenges.....but isn't that true of any nationwide/global company?! Most newbies are in ONE base for several months, helping them learn, so the weather if you are confident isn't as bad as it sounds.
Seriously, some people, me for one, enjoy the flying, but honestly part of that is the intensity of single pilot IFR with a 6 pack with lots of hand flying.
Honestly not for everyone, but weekends off, and working around sunrise AM half a day off and the the evening PM with a typical night off, with one of the periods at home isn't bad for a full time job....some runs fly 100 hrs a month....some barely 30, just depends on what you bid for assignment.

970pilot 09-03-2020 02:10 PM

Miami Base?
 
Whats the status of the Miami base for pilots? I saw an A&P job listing for Miami so I was curious

frmrbuffdrvr 09-03-2020 07:20 PM


Originally Posted by 970pilot (Post 3121842)
Whats the status of the Miami base for pilots? I saw an A&P job listing for Miami so I was curious

We are currently staffed in MIA. But that could change as the base hopefully grows. Keep an eye on the job boards. If openings become available...

own nav 09-06-2020 03:27 PM


Originally Posted by fulldeflection (Post 3121309)
What made the flying so difficult? The equipment? I've heard Ameriflight's birds are old with old avionics.

Ever fly a Metro with deferred nose wheel steering? Not only are they old, but a lot of the parts aren't made any more, so you keep getting refurbs (which often don't work any better than the part they replaced). All part of the adventure, right?

HulkaBurger 09-07-2020 08:20 AM


Originally Posted by own nav (Post 3123275)
Ever fly a Metro with deferred nose wheel steering? Not only are they old, but a lot of the parts aren't made any more, so you keep getting refurbs (which often don't work any better than the part they replaced). All part of the adventure, right?

Even worse, ever fly a Metro with a deferred nosewheel steering and then been stupid enough to try to use it? 🤪😲

neverposts 09-07-2020 10:44 AM

The metro has 17 memory items. The 767 has one third the memory items. Metro was created by idiots to be flown by geniuses

own nav 09-07-2020 04:16 PM


Originally Posted by HulkaBurger (Post 3123607)
Even worse, ever fly a Metro with a deferred nosewheel steering and then been stupid enough to try to use it? 🤪😲

We called it "Zoolander" when it was only able to turn one direction. Oh the memories.

CrateShipper 09-08-2020 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by neverposts (Post 3123685)
The metro has 17 memory items. The 767 has one third the memory items. Metro was created by idiots to be flown by geniuses

Now that is awesome!

MinRest 09-08-2020 07:33 PM


Originally Posted by neverposts (Post 3123685)
The metro has 17 memory items. The 767 has one third the memory items. Metro was created by idiots to be flown by geniuses

No, it was never created to be a single pilot freight hauler. The flying at AMF is challenging because they take complicated airplanes, and make you fly them by yourself. Having trained FO's is a nice addition but the responsibility still lies on the CA, AMF doesn't truly hold the FO to second in command standards like an airline does. Not to mention that the planes are beyond old...

HotDogSonicBoom 09-09-2020 06:38 PM


Originally Posted by neverposts (Post 3123685)
The metro has 17 memory items. The 767 has one third the memory items. Metro was created by idiots to be flown by geniuses

Hahahah this is great.

Hawaii808 09-09-2020 10:29 PM


Originally Posted by neverposts (Post 3123685)
The metro has 17 memory items. The 767 has one third the memory items. Metro was created by idiots to be flown by geniuses


I ain’t no genius!

but I did stay at a holiday in express during my Ameriflight stint.

frmrbuffdrvr 09-10-2020 07:22 AM


Originally Posted by neverposts (Post 3123685)
The metro has 17 memory items. The 767 has one third the memory items. Metro was created by idiots to be flown by geniuses

Not to mention the metro was designed and first built over 10 years before the 767 and has no where NEAR the automation.

TeamSasquatch 09-10-2020 01:42 PM

Can’t forget the “Texas Tampon” name either.

Meep 09-10-2020 10:53 PM


Originally Posted by fulldeflection (Post 3121309)
What made the flying so difficult? The equipment? I've heard Ameriflight's birds are old with old avionics.

Hand flying an old airplane, alone, through weather, with no gps going to an airport in the mountains with a DME arc to VOR approach and limited ATC radar coverage.....what could go wrong! Haha. Don’t get me wrong I didn’t say it was bad, just challenging.

SonicFlyer 09-11-2020 05:40 AM


Originally Posted by Meep (Post 3126618)
Hand flying an old airplane, alone, through weather, with no gps going to an airport in the mountains with a DME arc to VOR approach and limited ATC radar coverage.....what could go wrong! Haha. Don’t get me wrong I didn’t say it was bad, just challenging.

All of their aircraft have GPS now these days, right?

Meep 09-13-2020 05:57 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3126684)
All of their aircraft have GPS now these days, right?

No clue.......

Seneca Pilot 09-13-2020 06:02 PM


Originally Posted by TeamSasquatch (Post 3126310)
Can’t forget the “Texas Tampon” name either.


Lawn dart.:D

frmrbuffdrvr 09-13-2020 07:50 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3126684)
All of their aircraft have GPS now these days, right?

Almost. Some of the metros don't. The 99s and E120s all do. I think all of the 1900s do but some are not approach capable. Only enroute.

TransWorld 09-14-2020 06:42 AM


Originally Posted by Hawaii808 (Post 3125606)
I ain’t no genius!

but I did stay at a holiday in express during my Ameriflight stint.

Is that an upgrade from the previous lodging accommodations?

Continuingappch 09-14-2020 06:44 AM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3126684)
All of their aircraft have GPS now these days, right?

Many of the 1900s do not, and some are not approach capable. If you can't find an airport without a moving map you won't make it through training regardless.

Kansaspilot92 09-14-2020 06:06 PM


Originally Posted by Continuingappch (Post 3128400)
Many of the 1900s do not, and some are not approach capable. If you can't find an airport without a moving map you won't make it through training regardless.

I completely agree that potential pilots coming here should be fully capable of /A navigation and very proficient. But honestly GPS has evolved now to a place where while I am capable of navigating /A, a WAAS enabled GPS just gives a massive safety margin I personally would prefer. And as we move towards NextGen there are already some airports /A aircraft can’t go into because waypoints on procedures are RNAV instead of VOR/ADF.

neverposts 09-14-2020 06:12 PM

"If you can't find an airport without a moving map you won't make it through training regardless."

you could be getting yelled at by the terminator for missing one single callout in the sim! such fun!

Hawaii808 09-16-2020 09:43 PM


Originally Posted by TransWorld (Post 3128398)
Is that an upgrade from the previous lodging accommodations?

honestly, Ameriflight is the only place I’ve worked where I actually had a layover hotel. All my other jobs only required hotels during training and TDY. I guess I’ve been fortunate if being home every night is the goal. I mostly stayed at Best Westerns or Red Lions while at AMF. Quality varies greatly by location.This was circa 2010-2012

Stellar 09-22-2020 08:54 AM

Hello, can someone help me with contact information for recruiter?

Thank You!

MxDeferred 09-22-2020 10:27 AM


Originally Posted by Stellar (Post 3133832)
Hello, can someone help me with contact information for recruiter?

Thank You!

[email protected]

Thats the generic inbox; a previous post a few pages back had it listed up there.

f8lsvt 10-11-2020 03:37 PM


Originally Posted by Stellar (Post 3133832)
Hello, can someone help me with contact information for recruiter?

Thank You!

Have you oh I don’t know, tried looking at their website?!?!

TransWorld 10-11-2020 07:46 PM


Originally Posted by f8lsvt (Post 3143847)
Have you oh I don’t know, tried looking at their website?!?!

In the old days, I would call you Captain Obvious. But not any more. I have seen some pretty dumb questions.

Standing at a gate, with the large number Gate C7 posted on the wall. Asked where they can get to Gate C7. You are here. At Gate C7. Yes, I know, But I need to know how do I get to the Gate C7, my plane leaves in a half hour.

goodridecowboy 01-15-2021 06:30 PM

Bases/Airframes
 
Can anyone direct me toward the information about which aircraft are based where? The website and APC lists domiciles, but not aircraft associated with them.

Continuingappch 01-16-2021 03:10 AM


Originally Posted by goodridecowboy (Post 3182093)
Can anyone direct me toward the information about which aircraft are based where? The website and APC lists domiciles, but not aircraft associated with them.

That level of detail isn't posted anywhere for the public. PM me and we can discuss.

frmrbuffdrvr 01-16-2021 11:18 AM


Originally Posted by goodridecowboy (Post 3182093)
Can anyone direct me toward the information about which aircraft are based where? The website and APC lists domiciles, but not aircraft associated with them.

Part of that is because they can change. Are you interested in a particular base?

goodridecowboy 01-16-2021 08:02 PM


Originally Posted by Continuingappch (Post 3182182)
That level of detail isn't posted anywhere for the public. PM me and we can discuss.

Got it, thanks! Tried to PM you, but it said they were turned off. Would love to talk to you more though!

goodridecowboy 01-16-2021 08:36 PM


Originally Posted by frmrbuffdrvr (Post 3182384)
Part of that is because they can change. Are you interested in a particular base?

Not interested in a particular base. Trying to do some medium/long term planning though. Sent you a PM!

flyguy0246 01-17-2021 02:51 PM

Are they currently hiring FO's?

Continuingappch 01-18-2021 12:05 AM


Originally Posted by flyguy0246 (Post 3182807)
Are they currently hiring FO's?

Nothing posted internally, the talent shortage will probably have to ramp up a bit first. Never hurts to get hold of recruiting.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands