Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Logging Time Question

Old 09-20-2008, 06:24 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by Stick&Rudder View Post
I guess the first question I would ask is if the pilot in the left seat is an MEI? Just a thought towards the dual question received...

"Part 91 gig-Corporate company with a King Air 300 in the right seat? Would it be logging SIC and multi turbine time if the PIC has the "SIC required" on his type rating?"

First thing to check on the -300 is the mtow, if I remember correctly it's close to 14,000 lb. putting it over the 10,500 rq.'d for the a type?

just my .02, I like playing devils advocate once and a while...
12,500+ required for type. The -300 is over, the -200 is not.
mooney is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 07:58 AM
  #12  
On Reserve
 
Stick&Rudder's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Some DH, Somewhere...
Posts: 17
Default

Originally Posted by mooney View Post
12,500+ required for type. The -300 is over, the -200 is not.
Thanks, I should probably re-read my posts before hitting submit.
Stick&Rudder is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 12:20 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TRS531's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 231
Default

Yeah the king air I was referring to is a 300 and it's 14,000 lbs I think. The job is part 91..flying about 200 hrs a year right seat...I think 32K pay. I'm thinking it'd be a great learning time but I wanted to double check it's legitmate multi/turbine and SIC time to be logging.

I saw one argument about the "SIC required" on the PIC's type would obviously make it ok...Kind of like the Beech 1900C I believe which can be single pilot operated but has the same stipulations...and I don't think many would want to fly that a long way single pilot.

I guess SIC time in a King 300 or 350 only is legitmate SIC time and not in a C90 or 200?!?
TRS531 is offline  
Old 09-20-2008, 02:53 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by TRS531 View Post

I guess SIC time in a King 300 or 350 only is legitmate SIC time and not in a C90 or 200?!?
-200 or -90 time SIC time is legit, provided your company's ops specs require one and you have passed a 135 checkride in the aircraft.
mooney is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 04:17 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Qtip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: B747, Left
Posts: 85
Default

Originally Posted by mcartier713 View Post
Ok, so I'm sitting in the right seat of a C-421 on Friday for a 135 Charter... If the guy in the left seat has his ATP (and 135 single pilot IFR mins of course), can I log the flight as dual/company training received?
135 operations: You are not allowed to even manipulate the flight controls unless you work for that carrier and is current and qualified in that specific aircraft. A training flight (logable) will be Part 91, followed by the 135 proficiency check and line check. After that, a company check airman will most likely fly with you: If you received a 135 SIC ride, then log SIC. If it was a 135 PIC ride, then log PIC.

Part 91 operations: Log whatever you want. It is your logbook but don't be surprised if asked to justify (by the FAA or its representative) how your flight time can be used towards a certificate or rating and/or currency.
Qtip is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRMcaptain
Flight Schools and Training
48
10-01-2014 06:38 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
sigep_nm
Regional
45
09-06-2008 12:13 PM
rocketman3746
Major
21
08-25-2008 06:42 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Career Questions
4
08-02-2008 02:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices