Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Part 135
Small 135 Aircraft Recommendation >

Small 135 Aircraft Recommendation

Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Small 135 Aircraft Recommendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2010, 06:18 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default Small 135 Aircraft Recommendation

My boss asked me to look into starting a 135 operation based off a Meridian. He planned on starting one a year from now with a King Air, but after he found out the low fuel burn of the Meridian and that he could use it for 135 (He thought you needed a twin for 135 IFR operations) he decided to start the charter service early with a smaller plane. He is really focusing on a Meridian, but I want to look at the other options.

The max trip length will probably be in the 500 mile range, but most will probably be 200-300 with some trips to Canada. Our budget is between 1 and 2 million with favor to the lower end. Besides charter, the plane would be primarily used as a personal aircraft for short trips for the boss (he owns a medium size business jet and does not want to use it for short trips). An important consideration is going to be insurance as the charter pilot will have low time (1200-1500).

I would prefer getting a TBM700, but I don’t know how either the Meridian or TBM are to live with. Pros and cons for the Meridian and TBM are welcome as well as any other airframe.

Thanks!

Last edited by 2StgTurbine; 10-30-2010 at 06:56 PM.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 06:49 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dn_wisconsin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,114
Default

How is the charter pilot going to have less than 1200 Total Time, unless you are doing VFR 135 ops?
dn_wisconsin is offline  
Old 10-30-2010, 06:55 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

Originally Posted by dn_wisconsin View Post
How is the charter pilot going to have less than 1200 Total Time, unless you are doing VFR 135 ops?
Good point. I was trying to be generic but I overlooked that important FAR. The pilot has 1200 hours now and depending on when the 135 starts, he may have 1500.
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 07:58 AM
  #4  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Not sure if you know this already, but if he is looking to start a year from now, you probably need to start the paperwork IMMEDIATELY. My understanding is that it takes 1-2 years to finally get your certificate. There are things like finding a chief pilot, director of operations and director of maintenance. I had a friend who was looking into starting a 135 operation off a Caravan and reading through 135 and 119 shows how much has to go into it.

There is a video online that explains the process. It's an old FAA 1980s video but its pretty informative.
snippercr is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 08:57 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 693
Default

There is enough generic paperwork around for the 135 certificate, and it's fairly easy as I have done this several years back. We used verbiage such "due to the limited size and scope of the operation, the CP and DO positions are combined". We initially got the certificate on a C-172, then added A/C to it later on. The 172 was already on CAMP.
clipperskipper is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 10:38 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fjetter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: King Air 200 CA Hawker 800/900 FO
Posts: 810
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr View Post
Not sure if you know this already, but if he is looking to start a year from now, you probably need to start the paperwork IMMEDIATELY. My understanding is that it takes 1-2 years to finally get your certificate. There are things like finding a chief pilot, director of operations and director of maintenance. I had a friend who was looking into starting a 135 operation off a Caravan and reading through 135 and 119 shows how much has to go into it.

There is a video online that explains the process. It's an old FAA 1980s video but its pretty informative.
You may want to look at a single pilot operator certificate. This makes the certfication process easier because you do not need an operations manual which is always a big process and you won't need a Chief Pilot, Director of Operations, or a Director of Maintenance as a single pilot operator.
fjetter is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 01:03 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Default

Originally Posted by fjetter View Post
You may want to look at a single pilot operator certificate. This makes the certfication process easier because you do not need an operations manual which is always a big process and you won't need a Chief Pilot, Director of Operations, or a Director of Maintenance as a single pilot operator.
We were leaning on a single pilot operation, but I like the structure of a traditional 135 carrier. I am writing a manual now with the intention of the operation growing in the future. Casual conversation with the FAA gave us an approval time table of 6 months.

The biggest variable for now is the aircraft. My boss knows a lot about large twins (jet and piston) but he is new to single engine turbines. He has latched on to the Meridian, but I want to make sure we don’t base all of our decisions on a low fuel burn. I know how to compare performance numbers, but they do not tell the entire story. When something breaks, what is the easiest plane to fix? Although the book says it can hold 6, will those 6 be comfortable? If you were given the choice, what plane would you want for 135, a TBM or a Meridian?
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 02:06 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dn_wisconsin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 1,114
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
We were leaning on a single pilot operation, but I like the structure of a traditional 135 carrier. I am writing a manual now with the intention of the operation growing in the future. Casual conversation with the FAA gave us an approval time table of 6 months.

The biggest variable for now is the aircraft. My boss knows a lot about large twins (jet and piston) but he is new to single engine turbines. He has latched on to the Meridian, but I want to make sure we don’t base all of our decisions on a low fuel burn. I know how to compare performance numbers, but they do not tell the entire story. When something breaks, what is the easiest plane to fix? Although the book says it can hold 6, will those 6 be comfortable? If you were given the choice, what plane would you want for 135, a TBM or a Meridian?

If your boss is willing to spend a few million on a new plane, I'd think he would be willing to send someone to check out the planes and do a test flight. The aircraft companies are more than happy to show the planes and take you for a flight if you are a serious buyer.
dn_wisconsin is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 03:40 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A-320 FO
Posts: 693
Default

Don't worry about the certification process, most of the Inspectors at the FSDO's today are quite helpful. The PC-12 offers a lot of bang for your buck, and superior range. Just one more aircraft to consider.
clipperskipper is offline  
Old 10-31-2010, 04:01 PM
  #10  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post

The biggest variable for now is the aircraft. My boss knows a lot about large twins (jet and piston) but he is new to single engine turbines. He has latched on to the Meridian, but I want to make sure we don’t base all of our decisions on a low fuel burn. I know how to compare performance numbers, but they do not tell the entire story. When something breaks, what is the easiest plane to fix? Although the book says it can hold 6, will those 6 be comfortable? If you were given the choice, what plane would you want for 135, a TBM or a Meridian?
When ever helping people look at planes (light single and twin piston) one of the main things we look at after "MPG", is useful load. Sure it has 6 seats, but can you put 6 people in it and put any amount of fuel? Especially if they want to bring any luggage. So while looking keep an eye out for useful load.

Also ADs. There can be some really expensive ADs for certain serial #s for certain airplanes. So one make and model would be fine, but an earlier (or later) manufactured one may have used a different part and is thus required to conform to the AD. I remember helping someone look at C421s and there was this really expensive AD that had something to do with the wing spar.

edit: I remember about that single pilot certification. I thought there were 3 "Special" ones. Like single pilot, Single PIC (and you could have like 3 FOs), and Limited. Not sure, it was a while ago when I looked.
snippercr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SrfNFly227
Regional
179
10-16-2009 10:12 PM
sellener
Part 135
21
03-24-2009 07:29 PM
meritflyer
ExpressJet
70
06-12-2008 09:05 PM
rickair7777
Regional
41
11-05-2007 04:52 AM
CloudSailor
Cargo
35
10-10-2007 08:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices