Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Part 135 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/part-135/)
-   -   Caravan overwater regulations -Cuba (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/part-135/94592-caravan-overwater-regulations-cuba.html)

Skycakes 04-19-2016 12:15 PM

Caravan overwater regulations -Cuba
 
Hey guys,
Never flown a caravan, just currently King Airs. A competitor of ours out of PBI is mentioning flying a Caravan 135 Key West to Havana when things open up. Pax no cargo. I didn't think this would be possible due to 135 single engine rules.

Reason I ask is I have a possible opening to get into this competitor with a position in my first jet. However they will also qualify me in a caravan. Not too excited about that, especially of sketchy stuff bending 135 regs is happening. But hoping to get into my first slowtation...can anyone offer insight on the legality of this? Thanks!!

WillFlyForSpam 04-19-2016 04:49 PM

Does this particular operator's name rhyme with Tofuleyley? :)

If so then they won't do it. I was with the company last year and they said they couldn't figure how to do it while staying in proper glide range.

Navajo31 04-19-2016 06:32 PM

Can't do it. 135 regs clearly require you to be able to make it to shore with one engine inop. Tough to make it 45 miles with one engine inop in a Caravan!

loveme117 04-28-2016 06:49 PM

25 miles off shore is about as far as you wanna go with people on board before you have oxygen on board... anything more than that, well. Thank god the PT-6 is one of the most reliable motors out there, or we'd hear about a lot more planes going in the ocean apparently...

I miss my dog 09-02-2016 06:53 AM

135.167 covers extended overwater requirements (beyond 50nm from a shoreline). Just have to carry raft and survival equipment and train on it.

Navajo31 09-08-2016 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by I miss my dog (Post 2193793)
135.167 covers extended overwater requirements (beyond 50nm from a shoreline). Just have to carry raft and survival equipment and train on it.

Wrong. You need to be able to reach the nearest shoreline with an engine inoperative. When you only have one engine, well.....it's gliding distance. (PAR 135.183)

A contact in the South Florida FSDO told me they are looking very closely at FLL operators who are flying the Van to the Bahamas. They are not happy about it. Their definition of "gliding distance" seems to be even more than the 14:1 ratio that Cessna claims. When they accept "cross DEKAL at 4,000" they are definitely swimming home if the engine quits.

bozobigtop 09-08-2016 01:38 PM


Originally Posted by Navajo31 (Post 2198609)
Wrong. You need to be able to reach the nearest shoreline with an engine inoperative. When you only have one engine, well.....it's gliding distance. (PAR 135.183)

A contact in the South Florida FSDO told me they are looking very closely at FLL operators who are flying the Van to the Bahamas. They are not happy about it. Their definition of "gliding distance" seems to be even more than the 14:1 ratio that Cessna claims. When they accept "cross DEKAL at 4,000" they are definitely swimming home if the engine quits.

Don't know what altitude that glide ratio is for but I will make this perfectly clear, the data is based on a new engine and airframe. Insurance companies love this type of stuff because their lives are generally boring in which is good. Don't give them anything to be excited about.

TimetoClimb 09-09-2016 06:55 AM


Originally Posted by Navajo31 (Post 2198609)
Wrong. You need to be able to reach the nearest shoreline with an engine inoperative. When you only have one engine, well.....it's gliding distance. (PAR 135.183)

A contact in the South Florida FSDO told me they are looking very closely at FLL operators who are flying the Van to the Bahamas. They are not happy about it. Their definition of "gliding distance" seems to be even more than the 14:1 ratio that Cessna claims. When they accept "cross DEKAL at 4,000" they are definitely swimming home if the engine quits.

We use a conservative 2 miles/1000' (10:1) in the Pilatus to judge our power off glide distance for meeting this regulation. Our version out here on the west coast is "cross PACIF at 5,000", puts us right on the edge of the envelope as to whether we'd make it to the coast. Luckily the predominate winds are onshore and that'd help a little if we lost an engine.

On another note, I heard the PT-6A is being used to generate electricity in certain undeveloped regions and for oil drilling platforms. Apparently the engine can run perfectly for years without a fraction of the maintenance required by FARs.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:20 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands