The original poster cited his integrity as what sets him apart among 300 hour pilots. That and his whopping one week of professional first-hand experience. It was his own self-righteous indignation that he's listed as his reason for separation, with a show of solidarity for a fellow employee.

The original poster has stated that he loved the company. He didnt quit due to "crap planes," or a "crap operator." In fact, he states that were it not for a single individual, "I'd love the company." He said in his initial post that the maintenance wasn't bad.

Given that neither of your points apply and are irrelevant, did you nother to read his comments or the thread?