Search
Notices
Part 91 and Low Time Jump pilots, crop dusting, and other Part 91 jobs

Part 91 overtime non-exempt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2018, 07:46 PM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 7
Default Part 91 overtime non-exempt

Hi all, just looking to see everyone’s experience as to who was eligible for overtime and who was not. I’m operating as Part 91 corporate pilot flying twins for a startup on a fixed salary. Just courious if there is a salary threshold that would make me exempt from being eligible for overtime, or if all pilots are all eligible for overtime pay. I have seen the recent article regarding the pilots in AK, but never saw if they were operating under Part 91 or what their salaries were.
I’m in in the SF Bay Area, and just looking to see everyone’s experience.

Cheers
Flyer83 is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 02:58 AM
  #2  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

You should probably take a look at Cali Labor Laws regarding overtime for salaried workers.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 10-16-2018, 08:33 AM
  #3  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 7
Default

If it were only that simple. California does not specify whether they consider pilots to be exempt professionals. Alaska has ruled that pilots do not fall under the professional exempt category as there is no formal advanced technical academic training, and are therefore entitled to overtime. Other states have considered ATP holders who fly corporate to be exempt from overtime due to the length of time / number of hours of instruction received.
The people at the other end of the phone when calling the CA dept of labor are less than knowledgeable / helpful (eerily compared to the DMV).
Flyer83 is offline  
Old 10-20-2018, 06:06 PM
  #4  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Take the next step and pay a Labor attorney for their time.
May cost you $250-$300/hr for a consultation.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 10-20-2018, 07:12 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
Take the next step and pay a Labor attorney for their time.
May cost you $250-$300/hr for a consultation.
He would qualify as a professional BTW. OT, yea right! Part 91 is more like getting to fly for free with maybe a catered lunch. No one would do it unless they were desperate for the time.
kevbo is offline  
Old 10-20-2018, 08:38 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,978
Default

Originally Posted by Flyer83 View Post
If it were only that simple. California does not specify whether they consider pilots to be exempt professionals. Alaska has ruled that pilots do not fall under the professional exempt category as there is no formal advanced technical academic training, and are therefore entitled to overtime. Other states have considered ATP holders who fly corporate to be exempt from overtime due to the length of time / number of hours of instruction received.
The people at the other end of the phone when calling the CA dept of labor are less than knowledgeable / helpful (eerily compared to the DMV).
The specific issue in Alaska was that an advanced degree is not necessary to be a pilot, in appears in the docket that they are referring to things such as PhD, MD, JD, etc. In that ruling, an "advanced degree" was necessary to consider the person an "exempt professional".
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 10-21-2018, 04:52 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
The specific issue in Alaska was that an advanced degree is not necessary to be a pilot, in appears in the docket that they are referring to things such as PhD, MD, JD, etc. In that ruling, an "advanced degree" was necessary to consider the person an "exempt professional".
An ATP is often considered an advanced degree due to the nature of it being a terminal rating in the field.....so not sure I would base the interpretation of it on that.
Remember in AK, a pilot is often viewed as one step above a Pizza delivery driver since pilots are so common...so might be more of a cultural thing as legal that caused a different interpretation.
ZippyNH is offline  
Old 10-21-2018, 06:51 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,978
Default

Originally Posted by ZippyNH View Post
An ATP is often considered an advanced degree
First I've heard of this. Did you make it up? So like Master Craftsman, Master Jedi, Black Belt, Golf Pro, Wizard, etc.? I think it took me like 2 days studying with Sheppard Air to pass my ATP written. That sounds exactly like going to school for 8 years...
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 10-21-2018, 10:36 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 176
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
First I've heard of this. Did you make it up? So like Master Craftsman, Master Jedi, Black Belt, Golf Pro, Wizard, etc.? I think it took me like 2 days studying with Sheppard Air to pass my ATP written. That sounds exactly like going to school for 8 years...
Wording was in a decision...one of the Daniel Webster guys I flew had the link when we were talking about this very subject...he had been doing corporate stuff before switching to 91k for a pc-12 operator.
Was based upon the fact that an ATP is generally worth 2+ years of college time, and a Masters/PhD in aviation is very rare with only a couple school issuing them...so a BS WITH ATP was judged to be "terminal".
Having spent time flying up in AK, I will unequivocally say it is very different flying, both from a regulatory environment (135 ops specs are VERY different, though 121 less so in what is allowed, or that was the case before the last rewrites back in the late 90's) and a pilot job in AK is looked more akin to being almost below a truck driver since so many folks learn how to fly as just part of growing up....
So I would NOT base it based upon one AK case.
The ability to "hire and fire" is often another factor...as is pay.
ZippyNH is offline  
Old 10-21-2018, 12:27 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,978
Default

Originally Posted by ZippyNH View Post
Wording was in a decision...one of the Daniel Webster guys I flew had the link when we were talking about this very subject...he had been doing corporate stuff before switching to 91k for a pc-12 operator.
Was based upon the fact that an ATP is generally worth 2+ years of college time, and a Masters/PhD in aviation is very rare with only a couple school issuing them...so a BS WITH ATP was judged to be "terminal".
Having spent time flying up in AK, I will unequivocally say it is very different flying, both from a regulatory environment (135 ops specs are VERY different, though 121 less so in what is allowed, or that was the case before the last rewrites back in the late 90's) and a pilot job in AK is looked more akin to being almost below a truck driver since so many folks learn how to fly as just part of growing up....
So I would NOT base it based upon one AK case.
The ability to "hire and fire" is often another factor...as is pay.
So "Terminal"=Advanced? That doesn't make sense, not to mention that it was said that "an ATP is often considered an advanced degree". Terminal just means you've gone as far as you can, not that you have an advanced degree.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GWBic
Aviation Law
18
05-18-2018 02:13 PM
drjwilson
Flight Schools and Training
18
10-04-2016 06:25 PM
N618FT
Regional
33
11-19-2007 07:28 AM
colinflyin
Regional
10
03-13-2007 09:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices