The reg says the medical expires on a date based on your age on the date of the exam. So a PVT pilot should go out on the day before their 40th birthday and get a new medical to save money since it will be valid for 60 months which equals 5 years. Nothing expires after 36 months.
|
Whoops
Originally Posted by Twin Wasp
(Post 930335)
The reg says the medical expires on a date based on your age on the date of the exam. So a PVT pilot should go out on the day before their 40th birthday and get a new medical to save money since it will be valid for 60 months which equals 5 years. Nothing expires after 36 months.
Thanks! |
When did the Class III for <40 go from 36 months to 60 months?
I wish they would do away with Class 3 altogether. |
Originally Posted by N9373M
(Post 930514)
When did the Class III for <40 go from 36 months to 60 months?
|
Originally Posted by N9373M
(Post 930514)
When did the Class III for <40 go from 36 months to 60 months?
I wish they would do away with Class 3 altogether. |
Originally Posted by clipperskipper
(Post 931032)
Thought it was a challenging question when I wrote it, why do away with the Class 3, it's all most private pilots require?
|
The biggest issue with getting away from a third class medical is that folks only think of a guy flying a C-172 as using a 3rd class medical. Nobody thinks of the Jack Rouch's of the world flying jets under FAR 91. Were do you draw the line? While some might say the C-172 driver doesn't need a medical, few would feel that a jet (John Travolta's B707) doesn't need one.
The second thing to watch is how the whole LSA movement pans out. I see many self certifying pilots not really assessing if they are fit to fly. The open question is "Will the number of pilot incapacitations rise?"
Originally Posted by N9373M
(Post 931045)
The merits of a Driver's License in lieu of a Class 3 medical for GA has been a topic for debate for almost a decade. The incidence of incapacitation in GA is statistically small. There are arguments to be made on both sides of the table.
|
Originally Posted by jonnyjetprop
(Post 931060)
The biggest issue with getting away from a third class medical is that folks only think of a guy flying a C-172 as using a 3rd class medical. Nobody thinks of the Jack Rouch's of the world flying jets under FAR 91. Were do you draw the line? While some might say the C-172 driver doesn't need a medical, few would feel that a jet (John Travolta's B707) doesn't need one.
The second thing to watch is how the whole LSA movement pans out. I see many self certifying pilots not really assessing if they are fit to fly. The open question is "Will the number of pilot incapacitations rise?" I see my GP for regular physicals, etc. Why do I need to see an AME to tell me I'm still not color blind? I would surmise that those that know they will fail a Class 3 aren't going to get one and possibly fly anyway. You raise some very interesting points - well done |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands