Search
Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

Could flow stop?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2018, 07:14 PM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant View Post
As frustrating as this is for those who are being displaced out of domicile into the left seat, I suspect most of those who are complaining were those who benefited from the $20k-$35k in combined bonuses and longevity step increases, while the top half of the seniority list was ignored.

Increased flow is something that helps everyone, though the more senior one is, the greater the short term impact. Junior manning or street Captain hiring was going to occur, and while I agree something of this nature should have been put forth for a vote by the pilot group, the angst directed towards the senior portion of the pilot group who gained a larger benefit than the junior portion is not warranted, given the huge financial gains only PSA First Officers have made over the last couple of years.

Year one FO was about $24k/year. Year two was about $32k. Now First Officers are earning $50k-$60k in their first year or two, while Captains are still earning sub-par wages.

You can argue that Captain pay and reserve rules would have improved without this agreement, but I don't believe that's a valid argument. The company simply would have began junior manning from the bottom of the list, and hiring street Captains as they have in the past.

Welcome to the airline industry. Welcome to the regionals.
Is your logic that since the FO's got bonuses in recent past years, and captains didn't, they should be okay with having to pay for crash pads, or hotels and live out of the domicile sometimes two legs that their seniority was holding? I don't think most FO's are mad at the senior pilot group as a whole anyway, just the agreement to be on reserve with crappy reserve rules (with promised and never delivered improvements) and have to pay the costs of the displacement themselves. Sure, the captain group didn't get anything for a lot of years, but those that came behind weren't responsible for that. And by the way, the amount of the bonus for most of us will never reach much above $23000, we are being upgraded before receiving more than one of those.

Last edited by hawkman; 07-30-2018 at 07:16 PM. Reason: add
hawkman is offline  
Old 07-30-2018, 07:53 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,109
Default

Originally Posted by hawkman View Post
And by the way, the amount of the bonus for most of us will never reach much above $23000, we are being upgraded before receiving more than one of those.
This got me thinking. If class sizes ever do start to dwindle, I’d be surprised/not surprised if the company started offering 40k-50k bonuses spread out over 3 years. That way it sounds nice to new hires, but the company knows they’ll only have to pay half of that because you’ll be forced to upgrade after 1.5 to 2 years. Essentially not paying anymore than they are right now.
Thedude86 is offline  
Old 07-30-2018, 08:05 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by hawkman View Post
Is your logic that since the FO's got bonuses in recent past years, and captains didn't, they should be okay with having to pay for crash pads, or hotels and live out of the domicile sometimes two legs that their seniority was holding? I don't think most FO's are mad at the senior pilot group as a whole anyway, just the agreement to be on reserve with crappy reserve rules (with promised and never delivered improvements) and have to pay the costs of the displacement themselves. Sure, the captain group didn't get anything for a lot of years, but those that came behind weren't responsible for that. And by the way, the amount of the bonus for most of us will never reach much above $23000, we are being upgraded before receiving more than one of those.
Most will be lucky to cash one installment check before upgrade. Honestly we go month after month of same old same old. And I understand the senior guys seeing it as by the time change comes they’ll be either gone, close to flow, or even retirement, that they don’t have a dog in the fight anymore. But with a huge majority of the pilot group being here 2 years or less. Why don’t we just go scorched earth and elect a complete new regime of people who have shared these frustrations?
captande is offline  
Old 07-30-2018, 08:08 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 428
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86 View Post
This got me thinking. If class sizes ever do start to dwindle, I’d be surprised/not surprised if the company started offering 40k-50k bonuses spread out over 3 years. That way it sounds nice to new hires, but the company knows they’ll only have to pay half of that because you’ll be forced to upgrade after 1.5 to 2 years. Essentially not paying anymore than they are right now.
That's essentially what Mesa did/is doing. We're not too far off. We have a long way to go if we indeed want to be the most respected regional airline. The dark days for airline hiring are on the horizon, especially in respect to how they plan on training all these people. It'll be very interesting to see the industry 5 years from today.
Throwitaway is offline  
Old 07-31-2018, 06:58 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
Default

Originally Posted by texinc View Post
Seems like the reason given for senior manning vs junior manning was to avoid negative publicity about more inexperienced pilots becoming captains . . . which the union agreed with.
So ALPA traded first officer seniority to help management with a PR problem? Here I was thinking the Union was supposed to fight for the pilot group not the company.
Approach1260 is offline  
Old 07-31-2018, 08:04 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by hawkman View Post
Is your logic that since the FO's got bonuses in recent past years, and captains didn't, they should be okay with having to pay for crash pads, or hotels and live out of the domicile sometimes two legs that their seniority was holding? I don't think most FO's are mad at the senior pilot group as a whole anyway, just the agreement to be on reserve with crappy reserve rules (with promised and never delivered improvements) and have to pay the costs of the displacement themselves. Sure, the captain group didn't get anything for a lot of years, but those that came behind weren't responsible for that. And by the way, the amount of the bonus for most of us will never reach much above $23000, we are being upgraded before receiving more than one of those.
My logic isn’t about it being okay to be forced to upgrade out of domicile...though that would happen to someone regardless. It’s driven more by understanding how the regionals work, and how PSA works. At the end of the day, they dont care one iota what any of our quality of life or level of financial security is. All they care about is how to get bodies in the seat, at the cheapest cost they can get someone to show up for.

Over the last several years, there has been a lot of information posted here and elsewhere discussing the way PSA and other regional airlines operate. If one chooses not to research this, or chooses only to believe the “sunshine and rainbows” crowds and recruiters, then they are setting themselves up to be disappointed.

You have to understand that when the airline actively finds ways to violate the written agreement it accepted during contract negotiations (SAP transactions processed in real-time, minute by minute manipulation of the reserve grids that are supposed to be set, using alternative math to avoid having to increase the flow as previously agreed - as a few examples), they display a complete disregard for the employee, and “doing what is right”.

If someone doesn’t take the time to research before committing, I can understand why they would be frustrated/disappointed with the way the company (and local ALPA) operates. The company is going to negotiate something with ALPA that has such loose language that a ten-year-old could find a way to violate the spirit and intent of the language. Because the company doesn’t care a bit about your or any of our personal well-being, they will begin at the earliest opportunity to interpret things in the way that minimizes our well-being.

ALPA, for their part, has to take what they can get, based on the leverage they have. In this case there wasn’t any real leverage, as there’s nothing preventing junior-manning into the Captain position at this, or I suspect any regional airline.

PSA has long operated with a “if you don’t like it, quit” culture. This is why they won’t increase pay or quality of life for people already on property. If one is oblivious to the culture long enough to build some seniority, management believes there’s a very small chance that employee will leave. That’s why they would tell a prospective candidate who was going to be number 1,400 on the seniority list they would flow to AA in 5-6 years...at a time when we were flowing just 55/year, and the company was arguing that they weren’t required to increase the flow by just 11 pilots a year.
irrelevant is offline  
Old 07-31-2018, 08:16 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 566
Default

Originally Posted by irrelevant View Post
My logic isn’t about it being okay to be forced to upgrade out of domicile...though that would happen to someone regardless. It’s driven more by understanding how the regionals work, and how PSA works. At the end of the day, they dont care one iota what any of our quality of life or level of financial security is. All they care about is how to get bodies in the seat, at the cheapest cost they can get someone to show up for.
...

ALPA, for their part, has to take what they can get, based on the leverage they have. In this case there wasn’t any real leverage, as there’s nothing preventing junior-manning into the Captain position at this, or I suspect any regional airline.
But which other regional would call a base change during a forced upgrade a "voluntary" displacement, and why would our union support that language?

Have people grieved the real-time SAP language not being upheld?
WhiteMorpheus is offline  
Old 07-31-2018, 08:43 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteMorpheus View Post
But which other regional would call a base change during a forced upgrade a "voluntary" displacement, and why would our union support that language?

Have people grieved the real-time SAP language not being upheld?
Probably a good number of regionals would if they could get away with it. I’ve said for some time these agreements need to be published in advance so the pilot group can review them before they are signed off on. 1,800 sets of eyes looking at something for issues is better than ten sets.

There has been effort from the union to get the company to process SAP transactions faster. PSA likes to outsource everything to vendors, then claim they have no control over the outcome they are supposed to be responsible for.

ALPA was unable to even win the arbitration over the manipulation of the reserve grid by the company. It is unlikely they’ll be able to accomplish anything more than a temporary band-aid with the SAP....unless there’s something significant the company wants that they can’t figure out a way to interpret into the contract.

We need new blood to step up and get involved. That doesn’t mean we need to toss out everyone who is already serving in an ALPA role.
irrelevant is offline  
Old 07-31-2018, 02:55 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 152
Default

Originally Posted by Thedude86 View Post
This got me thinking. If class sizes ever do start to dwindle, I’d be surprised/not surprised if the company started offering 40k-50k bonuses spread out over 3 years. That way it sounds nice to new hires, but the company knows they’ll only have to pay half of that because you’ll be forced to upgrade after 1.5 to 2 years. Essentially not paying anymore than they are right now.
BTW, today's announcement has senior manning upgrades by pilots hired 1 year 5 months ago.
texinc is offline  
Old 07-31-2018, 04:55 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by texinc View Post
BTW, today's announcement has senior manning upgrades by pilots hired 1 year 5 months ago.
Not only that they had to force people to upgrade into a non Jeopardy class...
JayBee is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skyvector
Envoy Airlines
6894
06-18-2022 11:07 AM
PurdueFlyer
PSA Airlines
173
09-08-2021 08:26 AM
KingAirpilot90
PSA Airlines
1925
06-20-2018 12:38 PM
Skyler02
Regional
9
12-29-2014 02:00 PM
N927EV
Regional
245
03-28-2014 06:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices