Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > PSA Airlines
2 year commitment at PSA for bonuses?!?!? >

2 year commitment at PSA for bonuses?!?!?

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

2 year commitment at PSA for bonuses?!?!?

Old 06-25-2016, 04:36 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

There's always "more to that story" than just a lateral move after a training failure. I know guys who are at Mesa after a "training failure" elsewhere that shouldn't have been a failure, hands down. One for a FTD flight that wasn't even a checking event.

I hear from folks I trust that Mesa's training is good, as well as fair. And I am sure that in every contract airline (probably at every major and LCC as well) there are folks who slip thru the cracks that shouldn't.

Mesa's pay and benefits may be pretty low, but I know some top-notch pilots who work there. Not everyone who moves to Mesa is a training failure. Far from it, I'd wager.

Originally Posted by Biggz View Post
Although I do know a guy at Mesa that is a quality pilot, I know of three personally that have busted training at psa and passed at Mesa six months later without any problems. So this is definitely true
HighFlight is offline  
Old 06-25-2016, 04:59 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: CFI/II/MEI
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by CLT Guy View Post
I'm not so sure about that. Additional training completed and additional type ratings are not a bad thing.

Delta, United, AA, FedEx, and UPS know that if you go to work there, you are not likely to go somewhere else. Why would they really care about you switching regionals a few years before?
I've heard people say this, but most of my personal friends that have recently been hired at united and delta made a lateral move, and many of them got the interview within a year or less of the move. Its almost to the point that I wonder if going through a second training program on a different airframe looks good, like makes the applicant look more adaptable and trainable.
Bellanca is offline  
Old 06-25-2016, 07:03 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Default

Just remember, most people will lie when they fail a training event to make themselves look better. What really happened and their version of the story is quite different.

Do you really think that people would come out and say: "Well, they gave me an extra 2 sim sessions, and I am such a crappy pilot that I still couldn't figure out how to fly a non-percision approach. Oh, and I was also an obnoxious prick to the instructor and sim partner. They offered me a chance to go back to and try again, but I told them to **** off".

Because someone failed out elsewhere and did well at Mesa does not necessarily mean that the other company was too hard. It may mean that Mesa is too easy. In truth, it is probably a little of both.
daOldMan is offline  
Old 06-26-2016, 04:50 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: CRJ CA
Posts: 192
Default

Id actually heard somewhere else that they (Majors, LCC, etc) like to see a training event, like a type or upgrade within 5 years of being hired. I would imagine its like any job. If you go in for an office job somewhere and youve held 5 jobs in the last 6 years, you should be prepared to answer why. Im sure its no different. If you have a ready made speech about how you moved, or got divorced etc etc, then im sure its not going to rule you out at another carrier.

Im of the feeling, I just dont want to do 1 more basic indoc course than I absolutely have to.
FlexNinja is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
gremlin
Fractional
96
11-12-2010 08:09 AM
tcaphou
Fractional
8
02-25-2008 11:38 AM
cloudkicker1981
Hiring News
27
10-22-2006 12:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices