![]() |
Lifer at a regional... really that bad?
Given I'm in my mid-40s and just now applying to regionals, I'm wondering if any of you are, or know any "lifers" that actually don't mind it. I always say there are two frames of mind... a positive one and a negative one. No matter the industry, you'll have whiners and complainers, and you'll have those that make what they can out of it. I'm in the latter group. Plus, I don't have kids so I'm a little more mobile when it comes to having to relocate, and my cost of living is minimal.
Sure, I'm still not too old to make it to a major or legacy, but I'll never get beyond F/O, or if I do upgrade, it'll always be a junior domicile and/or narrowbody. Any regional lifers who still have some self respect left and a decent QOL? |
You're young enough for majors and should shoot for legacy/SWA. No question about that. If for no other reason than you won't have a job if you don't have an FO, and if legacies have to hire CFI's (math says they might) then there won't be many CFI's at regionals.
The only legit question is... what happens if I get stuck? In that case some things are under your control, others are not... You can pick a regional which has base(s) that you like. Base(s) plural is better, since bases come and go. You can choose a regional which is generally known for being "less toxic" than others, and generally has good QOL (although QOL is often totally variable depending base/seniority). If legacies don't pan out, then look at LCC's. That will depend on their growth, contracts, and other issues at the time so there's no right answer on that today. Might want to do LCC, or might be better off staying at a regional. It will depend on where things stand at the time. If hired at a legacy by age 50, you should upgrade and still have plenty of time to progress (retirements). Or you can hang out as a senior FO and still make good money (significantly better than RJ CA). For example... regionals might match 5% on the 401k, legacies will typically contribute 15% ish. Contribute, not match. Bottom line, regional lifer, you won't know if it's a good idea until your 65th birthday. Especially given the uncertainty of the future of the business model, you'll be along for the ride and in suspense the whole way. Bad things can happen to majors too, but you'll typically see it coming a long way off. |
Originally Posted by sealandair
(Post 2466105)
Given I'm in my mid-40s and just now applying to regionals, I'm wondering if any of you are, or know any "lifers" that actually don't mind it. I always say there are two frames of mind... a positive one and a negative one. No matter the industry, you'll have whiners and complainers, and you'll have those that make what they can out of it. I'm in the latter group. Plus, I don't have kids so I'm a little more mobile when it comes to having to relocate, and my cost of living is minimal.
Sure, I'm still not too old to make it to a major or legacy, but I'll never get beyond F/O, or if I do upgrade, it'll always be a junior domicile and/or narrowbody. Any regional lifers who still have some self respect left and a decent QOL? Don't sell yourself short. Your career path should take you way past a regional...and yes, a major QOL is COMPLETELY different from a regional QOL! |
Friends don't let friends become lifers. You are not old at all. Move on, brother!
|
All good points. I completely agree that a Legacy is WAY obtainable and even enough time to upgrade and build up a decent retirement.
That said, I have flown with several lifers at my regional that are absolutely ok with where they are and have no plans to try to move on. The pay is enough to live a decent lifestyle (depending on where you live) and once the seniority is built up enough to have more control over your schedule it can be hard for some to give that up. Is it the majors? of course not. Can it be good enough for the right person. Absolutely! |
Originally Posted by Tippy
(Post 2466215)
All good points. I completely agree that a Legacy is WAY obtainable and even enough time to upgrade and build up a decent retirement.
That said, I have flown with several lifers at my regional that are absolutely ok with where they are and have no plans to try to move on. The pay is enough to live a decent lifestyle (depending on where you live) and once the seniority is built up enough to have more control over your schedule it can be hard for some to give that up. Is it the majors? of course not. Can it be good enough for the right person. Absolutely! There are definitely people doing it, but it's really hard to determine if you'll be one of them in 20 years. |
There is nothing wrong with flying a regional jet for the remainder of ones career. I have known plenty who decided to do so even with having other options open to them. Every person is different in terms of what they want out of this job and only you can know what will work the best for you. No job is absolutely perfect (yes even the legacy one). Schedules, bases, equipment , money, job security, position (CA/FO) to name a few are all pros and cons one has to balance. This is necessary in order to find a perfect fit that YOU want.
If a left seat of a regional ends up working for you, there is absolutely no shame in staying there and enjoying the rest of the ride. |
Thanks guys. Not to sell myself short, but I came from the days of post 9/11 and the Great Recession. So it's in my nature to be skeptical and cautious... not pessimistic mind you... just cautious. Some of my friends threw in the towel.. so did I for 10 years but I'm back in the game and flying never left my blood. I'm just going to see how far this takes me.
Could anyone tell me if any of the following airlines would NOT be good choices (assuming I live in base): Horizon, Skywest, Endeavor, Envoy, Republic, Air Wisconsin, PSA. None of these would be considered "toxic" right? |
Originally Posted by sealandair
(Post 2466295)
Thanks guys. Not to sell myself short, but I came from the days of post 9/11 and the Great Recession. So it's in my nature to be skeptical and cautious... not pessimistic mind you... just cautious. Some of my friends threw in the towel.. so did I for 10 years but I'm back in the game and flying never left my blood. I'm just going to see how far this takes me.
Could anyone tell me if any of the following airlines would NOT be good choices (assuming I live in base): Horizon, Skywest, Endeavor, Envoy, Republic, Air Wisconsin, PSA. None of these would be considered "toxic" right? |
True, a friend of mine went through indoc @ Horizon...that was over a month ago, still getting paid to sit at home while he waits for a sim class. Seems there's a training staff shortage right along with a pilot shortage.
No sooner had I thought one of my chosen airlines was a good choice (starts with E), and first post in the thread someone is saying how bad the schedules suck, worst QOL in the industry, blah blah. Is there ANYWHERE that 's good? I'm thinking to heck with it... just go move to Alaska and make a ton of money in a Dash 8 100. |
Have you considered Netjets?
|
Originally Posted by sealandair
(Post 2466295)
Thanks guys. Not to sell myself short, but I came from the days of post 9/11 and the Great Recession. So it's in my nature to be skeptical and cautious... not pessimistic mind you... just cautious. Some of my friends threw in the towel.. so did I for 10 years but I'm back in the game and flying never left my blood. I'm just going to see how far this takes me.
Could anyone tell me if any of the following airlines would NOT be good choices (assuming I live in base): Horizon, Skywest, Endeavor, Envoy, Republic, Air Wisconsin, PSA. None of these would be considered "toxic" right? Worried about being a regional lifer? Go to on the AA Wholly Owned regionals with the flow. Piedmont will get you to AA the fastest of the group, followed by Envoy then PSA. If you want the better QOL of the 3 and are cool with a 9 year flow then PSA is the place to go. If you want DFW ORD or MIA then go to Envoy. |
I would have been happy to be a Lifer at my regional if they would have maintained a good QOL...but they did not recognize the pilot shortage till too late so I moved on...
|
Let me through this at you. You become a lifer at xyz regional. At some of them you top out the pay scale in 20 years as a capatain at maybe 120 an hour? Vs you do 4 years maybe at a regional and get picked up at a major and be a lifer first officer. After 3 years your making 190 an hour on a wide body, sure you would be on reserve on it but if you live in base it's easy money. Or you could be a senior first officer on a narrow body. Many many more options at a major, better pay, if you get in the next 5 years or so your seniority will go up. To me it's a no brainer. I knew a few lifers at my regional and they all said they don't want to give up QOL. I get it, I do, but if they can suck it up for a year, maybe 2, the QOL at a major is significantly better.
|
I would say that QOL wise if you can get into the top 10-20% of the seniority list at a regional then things are ok. But how long does that take at most places? The top 20% at regionals are pretty much there permanently and there is very little turnover. So, to get into that 20% you would have to get in at a new airline. Not many new regionals starting up nowadays.
So the short answer is to look outside the regionals for quality of life. My opinion would change if they offered new hires 17 days off per month, 4 weeks vacation per year, etc right from day one. Which, btw, if they really wanted to attract pilots this would do more than 10K bonuses and stuff like that. |
I can't understand the regional lifer mentality. Take a paycut for a year, then year 2 making more money than a 20 year regional CA at most places. Yeah lose some QOL, but pay will make up for it later on. Plus more job security if you are printing your own tickets. Most regional lifers I've come across are just bitter. Don't be that guy.
|
Originally Posted by VIRotate
(Post 2467684)
I can't understand the regional lifer mentality. Take a paycut for a year, then year 2 making more money than a 20 year regional CA at most places. Yeah lose some QOL, but pay will make up for it later on. Plus more job security if you are printing your own tickets. Most regional lifers I've come across are just bitter. Don't be that guy.
|
Originally Posted by Rahlifer
(Post 2467755)
Not all regional lifers are there just because they don't want to temporarily give up QOL. Many are simply unhireable at a major for various reasons. (DUI's, no degree, busted checkrides, etc) Most regionals will fail within the next decade and the whole lifer debate will be moot. No need to hate on lifers. :cool:
|
Originally Posted by sflpilot
(Post 2467768)
Yes Delta already has payscales for RJ's. They'll simply bring them on property when the time comes.
|
Originally Posted by sflpilot
(Post 2467768)
Yes Delta already has payscales for RJ's. They'll simply bring them on property when the time comes.
|
Originally Posted by BigfootCapo
(Post 2466235)
There is nothing wrong with flying a regional jet for the remainder of ones career. I have known plenty who decided to do so even with having other options open to them. Every person is different in terms of what they want out of this job and only you can know what will work the best for you. No job is absolutely perfect (yes even the legacy one). Schedules, bases, equipment , money, job security, position (CA/FO) to name a few are all pros and cons one has to balance. This is necessary in order to find a perfect fit that YOU want.
If a left seat of a regional ends up working for you, there is absolutely no shame in staying there and enjoying the rest of the ride. |
Originally Posted by sealandair
(Post 2466105)
Given I'm in my mid-40s and just now applying to regionals, I'm wondering if any of you are, or know any "lifers" that actually don't mind it. I always say there are two frames of mind... a positive one and a negative one. No matter the industry, you'll have whiners and complainers, and you'll have those that make what they can out of it. I'm in the latter group. Plus, I don't have kids so I'm a little more mobile when it comes to having to relocate, and my cost of living is minimal.
Sure, I'm still not too old to make it to a major or legacy, but I'll never get beyond F/O, or if I do upgrade, it'll always be a junior domicile and/or narrowbody. Any regional lifers who still have some self respect left and a decent QOL? My two cents. I am going to do what I criticize...offer opinions(not advice) regarding someone else's life decisions. I am always puzzled at the certitude many pilots have as to what career/flying decisions other people should make, even though they don't know them. There is no stability/security in any flying job. The only major airline I ever worked for shut down in the middle of the night while I was on a trip. Another airline used to brag how they had never lost money, even during the gulf war, then it was had never furloughed, then eventually bought by a leveraged buyout company (to avoid a takeover by another airline) then eventually sold and liquidated. Anyway, you get the idea....there are no "for sures" and history in this business suggests that this temporary period of prosperity will not last. So my opinion....regional flying can be rewarding and satisfying. If it isn't so for a given individual, it is often due to looking into the future to the detriment of the present. There is much to be said for achieving contentment with having "enough". Most of us got into this because we love flying airplanes and have a love for the profession. Unfortunately we sometimes let other opinions as to what we should do diminish our enjoyment of what we are doing. So...the world according to MaxQ(a bit of it anyway)...march to your own drummer, to thine own self be true. Money doesn't mean much unless you don't have any. |
Originally Posted by VIRotate
(Post 2467684)
I can't understand the regional lifer mentality. Take a paycut for a year, then year 2 making more money than a 20 year regional CA at most places. Yeah lose some QOL, but pay will make up for it later on. Plus more job security if you are printing your own tickets. Most regional lifers I've come across are just bitter. Don't be that guy.
|
Originally Posted by MaxQ
(Post 2468209)
SeaLand
My two cents. I am going to do what I criticize...offer opinions(not advice) regarding someone else's life decisions. I am always puzzled at the certitude many pilots have as to what career/flying decisions other people should make, even though they don't know them. There is no stability/security in any flying job. The only major airline I ever worked for shut down in the middle of the night while I was on a trip. Another airline used to brag how they had never lost money, even during the gulf war, then it was had never furloughed, then eventually bought by a leveraged buyout company (to avoid a takeover by another airline) then eventually sold and liquidated. Anyway, you get the idea....there are no "for sures" and history in this business suggests that this temporary period of prosperity will not last. So my opinion....regional flying can be rewarding and satisfying. If it isn't so for a given individual, it is often due to looking into the future to the detriment of the present. There is much to be said for achieving contentment with having "enough". Most of us got into this because we love flying airplanes and have a love for the profession. Unfortunately we sometimes let other opinions as to what we should do diminish our enjoyment of what we are doing. So...the world according to MaxQ(a bit of it anyway)...march to your own drummer, to thine own self be true. Money doesn't mean much unless you don't have any. |
Originally Posted by Rahlifer
(Post 2467950)
I'm not sure I follow your logic. Just because Delta has rj rates doesn't mean they're just going to place a bunch of regional pilots onto their list. :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Broncofan
(Post 2468555)
Money cant buy happiness, but it sure helps :)
|
Yes. Lifer at a regional really is that bad.
Originally Posted by sealandair
(Post 2466105)
Given I'm in my mid-40s and just now applying to regionals, I'm wondering if any of you are, or know any "lifers" that actually don't mind it. I always say there are two frames of mind... a positive one and a negative one. No matter the industry, you'll have whiners and complainers, and you'll have those that make what they can out of it. I'm in the latter group. Plus, I don't have kids so I'm a little more mobile when it comes to having to relocate, and my cost of living is minimal.
Sure, I'm still not too old to make it to a major or legacy, but I'll never get beyond F/O, or if I do upgrade, it'll always be a junior domicile and/or narrowbody. Any regional lifers who still have some self respect left and a decent QOL? Don’t sell yourself short by striving to stay in the minor leagues. Make your time at a regional just a time building experience on your way to a legacy, LCC or fractional like NetJets. Just my humble opinion. |
Originally Posted by Broncofan
(Post 2468555)
Money cant buy happiness, but it sure helps :)
|
Originally Posted by sflpilot
(Post 2468628)
I meant the aircraft only. Of course I am not talking about a flow or staple. But the math is looking like once mainline is continuously hiring massive numbers of pilots from the regionals or any other operation, it's only a matter of time before they go under. This is because they are already fighting for pilots at regionals, what happens when the attrition gets even worse and the regionals cannot staff their flights? They are not going to pay more at a regional than mainline so at that point the party's over. The real problem is there are just so few people in the flight school pipeline these days to come to the regionals. I can assure you that DL, AA and UAL will hire everyone they need to keep things running smoothly as the forced retirements hit. My point is they are not going to park aircraft at mainline so they can help save some garbage regional or 135 outfit by not hiring their pilots. People are ready and willing to take jobs at mainline, not so much regionals, hence they allocate the aircraft to keep the flying going and hire what they need.
|
Top out as captain for $120 after many years or make $150-$200 in your third year as FO at a major? Get a 16% retirement contribution or get 1% with a 6% match? Get real representation from ALPA National at a major or ...? Get perks/assistance such as dry cleaning reimbursement, higher per-diem, better moving benefits, in-flight meals, higher priority non-rev travel or get fewer/less of those things. Have more aircraft/schedule/route options or be limited to one or two aircraft types and short legs? Stay at diplomat quality downtown hotels or stay at the LaQuinta in the hotel farm by Target and Cracker Barrel?
Obviously majors aren't for everyone, but I like them. |
I think either ALPA or APA conducted a study which concluded that the break even point is seven years. If you can get to a legacy by age 58, you will make more money even if you don't upgrade than if you stayed at a regional as a topped out Captain.
So if money is your priority, then the math speaks for itself. If instead you value QOL or not retiring as an FO, then those would support the case for staying at a regional. |
Originally Posted by morerightrudder
(Post 2473107)
I think either ALPA or APA conducted a study which concluded that the break even point is seven years. If you can get to a legacy by age 58, you will make more money even if you don't upgrade than if you stayed at a regional as a topped out Captain.
So if money is your priority, then the math speaks for itself. If instead you value QOL or not retiring as an FO, then those would support the case for staying at a regional. But QOL is likely to be better at a major than at a regional in most cases, even for a junior major pilot. This assumes you're old enough that the kids are out of the house and weekends/holidays are not vital. If it's a prestige thing.. nobody really knows or cares about CA vs. FO, except for pilots and we all know it's seniority, not merit based. But everybody knows the difference between a regional and mainline... cuz they all hate RJ's. |
Originally Posted by morerightrudder
(Post 2473107)
I think either ALPA or APA conducted a study which concluded that the break even point is seven years. If you can get to a legacy by age 58, you will make more money even if you don't upgrade than if you stayed at a regional as a topped out Captain.
So if money is your priority, then the math speaks for itself. If instead you value QOL or not retiring as an FO, then those would support the case for staying at a regional. |
Thanks everyone who kept me optimistic!
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands