Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Pilots consider union (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/11407-pilots-consider-union.html)

ANPBird 04-06-2007 07:28 PM

Pilots consider union
 
Over half of SkyWest's fliers are interested; it would be a first in airline's 35-year history
By Paul Beebe
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake Tribune
Article Launched:04/04/2007 12:00:00 AM MDT


Over half of SkyWest Airline's 2,500 pilots have shown interest in joining the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), but the union isn't ready to conduct an election, ALPA President John Prater said Tuesday.
Prater met Monday in Salt Lake City with about 75 SkyWest pilots to answer questions and dispute mistaken notions about how ALPA would affect the St. George-based airline, which has never had a pilots union in its 35-year history.
Prater said enough pilots have signed cards that would permit ALPA to ask the National Mediation Board for a secret-ballot vote, but the union would not take that step until at least 70 percent of pilots indicate they want ALPA to represent them.
"We want an overwhelming majority," Prater said. "We want to make sure [pilots] have the opportunity to ask questions. Quite honestly, there are a lot of lies out there about being members of ALPA."
SkyWest officials were unavailable for comment Tuesday.
SkyWest has hired hundreds of pilots over the past year and has plans to add hundreds more to support its rapidly growing business. The airline flies as Delta Connection for Delta Air Lines and as United Express for United Airlines. On Sunday, SkyWest began flying as Midwest Connect for Midwest Airlines. Passenger traffic in February was up 9 percent from a year ago.
The airline is staging a job fair in Salt Lake City today and is planning 15 more fairs before July. Many of the new pilots going to work for SkyWest are in the early stages of their careers and may have distorted views of ALPA, Prater said.
He said some pilots believe their union dues will be 5 percent of their annual incomes. (The figure is 1.95 percent.) Others think ALPA will disrupt SkyWest so much that its growth will stop. Many aviators don't know that the largest airline pilots union in the world is a professional organization that advises the industry on safety and aircraft design, he said.
Although its mission is to help pilots win favorable pay, benefits and work rules, it isn't true that ALPA hurts airline companies, he said.
The union is the bargaining agent for Continental's 4,000 pilots, and last year the Houston-based carrier earned $343 million.
"We make no apologies that we are a union and that we conduct collective bargaining on behalf of members in order to provide [labor] contracts that provide a stable career," said Prater, who was elected president of ALPA in October and began a four-year term in January.
SkyWest pilots have tried twice since 1999 to affiliate with a union. Their last effort in 2004 failed when only a third of eligible pilots voted for an in-house association to act as their bargaining agent.
The issues driving the latest organizing effort have less to do with wages and benefits than with having more control over their fate as the airline industry consolidates, SkyWest pilots have said.
Even so, ALPA is primed to be more aggressive when bargaining with the airlines. Prater has taken over leadership of ALPA at a time when the financial prospects for airlines are not as bleak as they have been.
The Air Transport Association, which represents U.S. airline companies, is betting that industry profits will reach $4 billion this year after posting modest operating profits in 2006. Pilots who agreed to wage-and-benefit concessions in order to help their airlines survive now want to recover what they gave back, Prater said.
ALPA "desires to return to its roots of aggressive bargaining, strict contract enforcement, tenacious organizing and pilot action to restore our contracts and our profession," Prater said.
[email protected]

This was in the paper here in SLC a couple of days ago so I though I would beat this horse around again......and again.

Ellen 04-07-2007 07:29 AM


Originally Posted by ANPBird (Post 145156)
Over half of SkyWest's fliers are interested; it would be a first in airline's 35-year history
By Paul Beebe
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake Tribune
Article Launched:04/04/2007 12:00:00 AM MDT


Pilots who agreed to wage-and-benefit concessions in order to help their airlines survive now want to recover what they gave back, Prater said.
ALPA "desires to return to its roots of aggressive bargaining, strict contract enforcement, tenacious organizing and pilot action to restore our contracts and our profession," Prater said.
[email protected]

This was in the paper here in SLC a couple of days ago so I though I would beat this horse around again......and again.

Blah, Blah, Blah . . .what wages are there to give back? Pilots get paid nothing to begin with." And for ALPA to come out and say the SKYW pilot group is not interested in wages or benefits seems to send the wrong message to management. (i.e . . Pilots don't want an increase in pay, EXCELLENT . . .we can snub our nose at them for several more years. . . boy are they dumb.)

Ellen 04-07-2007 07:32 AM

This is why I hate ALPA . . . They are so worried about their 2% of all pilot wages. . . .about $3,000,000 a year in dues. Sounds like a good business model. Care to join my UNION . . I only charge 1.5%

ghilis101 04-07-2007 08:57 AM

theres a difference between what gets said in the paper, and what gets said underground. i believe prater when he says "we're takin it back." we'll just have to see. alpa will still most likely not get voted in at SKW but as long as the threat is there, mgt cant screw with the pilots too badly. keep up the good work ALPA

Airsupport 04-07-2007 09:43 AM


Originally Posted by ghilis101 (Post 145381)
theres a difference between what gets said in the paper, and what gets said underground. i believe prater when he says "we're takin it back." we'll just have to see. alpa will still most likely not get voted in at SKW but as long as the threat is there, mgt cant screw with the pilots too badly. keep up the good work ALPA

i believe alpa will get voted in at skywest. every time they have a vote, it gets closer, and closer. pretty soon it will end up being yes, and i think this is the year it will happen.

reelbigchair 04-07-2007 11:48 AM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 145394)
i believe alpa will get voted in at skywest. every time they have a vote, it gets closer, and closer. pretty soon it will end up being yes, and i think this is the year it will happen.


Actually you are very wrong...... it went from very very close 5 years ago, to a blowout against the union a couple years ago. I'm not saying it can't get passed this time, but such a trend does not exist.

Airsupport 04-07-2007 01:06 PM


Originally Posted by reelbigchair (Post 145455)
Actually you are very wrong...... it went from very very close 5 years ago, to a blowout against the union a couple years ago. I'm not saying it can't get passed this time, but such a trend does not exist.

just quoting a friend of mine, who happens to be a check airman, and a designated examiner there at skywest (and for all of utah), . He says there is a trend.

And like i have said before i could care less if skywest becomes alpa. Nothing would change there in the foreseeable future, and with me working at pinnacle, it would take even longer for it to have any effect on me here. So i don't care if the pass it or not. what i do care about is that if they do join that one day,,, probably after i am long gone from the regionals, that they work out a CRJ pay scale for all alpa carriers, that way pilots aren't used as a bargaining chip, but the companies reputation and quality of service is.

rickair7777 04-07-2007 01:35 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 145394)
i believe alpa will get voted in at skywest. every time they have a vote, it gets closer, and closer. pretty soon it will end up being yes, and i think this is the year it will happen.


I don't think so this time. A lot of fence sitters, but when it comes right down to it a lot of them won't take the chance of scewing up a known thing. Also the majority of new hires came from alpa regionals...and if they're making a lateral move they probably weren't too happy at their last company.

avi8tor4life 04-07-2007 09:45 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 145507)
Also the majority of new hires came from alpa regionals...and if they're making a lateral move they probably weren't too happy at their last company.

He's got a point there. A lot of the bad regionals that were talk about all the time are represented by none other that the fabled, high and mighty, ALPA. Let ALPA help it's own before it tries to get in with SkyWest. I don't want ALPA coming in if all they can give me is another Mesa.

I don't want a Union but if we do let's go in-house.

ghilis101 04-07-2007 09:51 PM

theyre not going to "give" you this or that, that is the wrong expectation here. Its what a union will do for your work environment.

ALPA may not have fixed the poor conditions at Mesa, but it still protects a pilot from being fired on the spot, which by the way can happen at skywest (its called "at will" employment because you can be fired at will). Not to mention nothing at skywest is a CONTRACT. it is POLICY instead, meaning they reserve the right to change it at anytime. A union gets you a contract through collective bargaining. Its not "ALPAs" fault if your reps and MEC are weak and score you a terrible contract. I would gladly put 1.95% of my paycheck to ensure my job, my pay, and my license are protected. not to mention a truly unified pilot group (xjet for example) can really work wonders.

ghilis101 04-07-2007 09:55 PM


Originally Posted by avi8tor4life (Post 145716)
I don't want a Union but if we do let's go in-house.

btw, you dont want a union at skywest or ever? thats a dangerous attitude to take with you especially if you want to work at a legacy carrier

JetJock16 04-07-2007 10:03 PM


Originally Posted by ghilis101 (Post 145720)
theyre not going to "give" you this or that, that is the wrong expectation here. Its what a union will do for your work environment.

ALPA may not have fixed the poor conditions at Mesa, but it still protects a pilot from being fired on the spot, which by the way can happen at skywest (its called "at will" employment because you can be fired at will). Not to mention nothing at skywest is a CONTRACT. it is POLICY instead, meaning they reserve the right to change it at anytime. A union gets you a contract through collective bargaining. Its not "ALPAs" fault if your reps and MEC are weak and score you a terrible contract. I would gladly put 1.95% of my paycheck to ensure my job, my pay, and my license are protected. not to mention a truly unified pilot group (xjet for example) can really work wonders.

Completely agree, ALPA's not the reason for Mesa's problem. It was their MEC's attempt to bring the flying JO was "outsourcing" to then Freedom Airlines. At that point in time Mesa's MEC only cared about bringing the flying back in house and to ensure the problem never happens again. Cause of this they accepted a ******y contract.

My card is in, I think it should at least go to a vote.

YAKflyer 04-08-2007 04:31 AM


Originally Posted by avi8tor4life (Post 145716)
I don't want a Union but if we do let's go in-house.

ALPA isn't without it's problems, but you couldn't afford an in house independent union. All ALPA pilots pay 1.95% dues, but all ALPA pilots are not created equal. The big boys, pay a lot more and bring in a lot more revenue. How that translates to them is 20% of their dues dollar stays with them to pay for the operation of their MEC's. 80% goes to pay for the national operation and to subsidize regional MEC's. The reason ALPA would be best is that as a regional pilot your dues dollar becomes two when you're under the ALPA umbrella. Additionally ALPA has the best infrastructure in pilot representation. Would you what to pay the legal bills while some lawyer learns the business? If SKW happened to get a change in management and you got into a big fight ALPA has deep pockets to support you when an independent would have to roll over do to a lack of money. Either way SKW pilots will do the business of representing SKW pilots, but why you would want to tie one arm behind their back is beyond me. Don't kid yourself, if SKW were to organize an independent would be a big mistake.

Airsupport 04-08-2007 04:54 AM

Strike Funds!!

Ellen 04-08-2007 08:28 AM


Originally Posted by ghilis101 (Post 145720)
Its what a union will do for your work environment.

ALPA may not have fixed the poor conditions at Mesa, but it still protects a pilot from being fired on the spot, which by the way can happen at skywest.

What percentage of pilots "GET FIRED?" I bet .00000001%

What percentage of pilots have to deal with the poor working conditions at MESA? (It's 100%). If you are honest, work hard, have a great personality, and are willing to learn, there is no reason for you to GET FIRED!

If you are worried about getting fired . . . . 1) You probably have none of the characteristics above, and 2) you probably are a really really bad pilot.

So screw ALPA.

Airsupport 04-08-2007 08:44 AM


Originally Posted by Ellen (Post 145843)
What percentage of pilots "GET FIRED?" I bet .00000001%

What percentage of pilots have to deal with the poor working conditions at MESA? (It's 100%). If you are honest, work hard, have a great personality, and are willing to learn, there is no reason for you to GET FIRED!

If you are worried about getting fired . . . . 1) You probably have none of the characteristics above, and 2) you probably are a really really bad pilot.

So screw ALPA.

except when you go to upgrade, have a bad day on your checkride and there is no second chance... i believe the call it up or out. :) that is probably not the best way to handle someone who messed up on their checkride,, we all have bad days, but to lose your job over it???

And that is the point... they don't need a reason to fire you!!!

Ellen 04-08-2007 10:37 AM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 145851)
except when you go to upgrade, have a bad day on your checkride and there is no second chance... i believe the call it up or out. :) that is probably not the best way to handle someone who messed up on their checkride,, we all have bad days, but to lose your job over it???

And that is the point... they don't need a reason to fire you!!!

I can tell you have no idea what's going on at the airlines. You don't GET FIRED because you mess up a checkride. If you mess up two, three or four; You might. Chances are that you'll be relegated to a carer FO. So I say again, if the only reason for ALPA is to ensure you don't get fired . . .THEN FORGET IT. I'd rather pay my own lawyer.

Airsupport 04-08-2007 12:01 PM


Originally Posted by Ellen (Post 145891)
I can tell you have no idea what's going on at the airlines. You don't GET FIRED because you mess up a checkride. If you mess up two, three or four; You might. Chances are that you'll be relegated to a carer FO. So I say again, if the only reason for ALPA is to ensure you don't get fired . . .THEN FORGET IT. I'd rather pay my own lawyer.

And i can tell you have no idea about skywest upgrade policy!!! read it and then come back and talk to me.

Blkflyer 04-08-2007 12:17 PM

Funny Stuff
 
LOL I love it how we regional pilots eat out own, its amazing we all brag my airline is better than yours my pay is better than yours.. One things for sure the pay and most of the work rules will remain ****ty as long as we have no Unity...

JetJock16 04-08-2007 02:22 PM


Originally Posted by Ellen (Post 145891)
I can tell you have no idea what's going on at the airlines. You don't GET FIRED because you mess up a checkride. If you mess up two, three or four; You might. Chances are that you'll be relegated to a carer FO. So I say again, if the only reason for ALPA is to ensure you don't get fired . . .THEN FORGET IT. I'd rather pay my own lawyer.

SKW policy is “Up or Out” on your initial upgrade, but you get three strikes before being FIRED. If you fail your final systems test on the first attempt that's 1 strike, any additional failure is another strike. F up your V1 cut, steep turns and 0 flap landing on your first attempt of your checkride, that's your 2nd strike (regardless of how many problems on the ride it counts as one strike and each ride would be one strike). Then on IOE you have a series of problems that accounts for you not completing IOE by 50 hrs, that's your 3rd strike. If this was you initial upgrade (FO to CA) and not a transition up grade (EMB CA to CRJ CA) then "YOU'RE FIRED!" If you’re a transition CA then you get 2 chances with a 6 month lock in between attempts and if you don’t pass the second time I think you’re stuck in your current CA position.

BUT, if it’s your first attempt at upgrade and you get 3 strikes YOUR FIRED. You don’t get strikes for small stuff, they are large screw ups. At SKW if you’ve got the right attitude you’ll be fine. I asked one of our SKW DE’s and he said that he only knows of one or two in the last few years that failed their initial upgrade and were fired, but they were fired. It’s BS but with out a union there’s nothing we can do about it, it's called “At Will Employment.”

Airsupport 04-08-2007 03:21 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 145976)
SKW policy is “Up or Out” on your initial upgrade, but you get three strikes before being FIRED. If you fail your final systems test on the first attempt that 1 strike. F up your V1 cut, steep turns and 0 flap landing on your first attempt of your checkride, that's your 2nd strike (regardless of how many problems on the ride it counts as one strike). Then on IOE you have a series of problems that accounts for you not completing IOE by 50 hrs, that's your 3rd strike. If this was you initial upgrade (FO to CA) and not a transition up grade (EMB CA to CRJ CA) then "YOU"RE FIRED!" If you’re a transition CA then you get 2 chances with a 6 month lock in between attempts and if you don’t pass the second time I think you’re stuck in your current CA position.

BUT, if it’s your first attempt at upgrade and you get 3 strikes YOUR FIRED. You don’t get strikes for small stuff, they are large screw ups. At SKW if you’ve got the right attitude you’ll be fine. I asked one of our SKW DE’s and he said that he only knows of one or two in the last few years that failed their initial upgrade and were fired, but they were fired. It’s BS but with out a union there’s nothing we can do about it, it's called “At Will Employment.”

that is my point, if they want you out,, this is when they will do it. hopefully you didn't rub someone the wrong way, or say something that will come back and bite you.

JetJock16 04-08-2007 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 145993)
that is my point, if they want you out,, this is when they will do it. hopefully you didn't rub someone the wrong way, or say something that will come back and bite you.

Correct, that's why attiude is key. You don't want to make waves for yourself.

PDXflyer 04-08-2007 03:38 PM


Originally Posted by ghilis101 (Post 145720)
theyre not going to "give" you this or that, that is the wrong expectation here. Its what a union will do for your work environment.

ALPA may not have fixed the poor conditions at Mesa, but it still protects a pilot from being fired on the spot, which by the way can happen at skywest (its called "at will" employment because you can be fired at will). Not to mention nothing at skywest is a CONTRACT. it is POLICY instead, meaning they reserve the right to change it at anytime. A union gets you a contract through collective bargaining. Its not "ALPAs" fault if your reps and MEC are weak and score you a terrible contract. I would gladly put 1.95% of my paycheck to ensure my job, my pay, and my license are protected. not to mention a truly unified pilot group (xjet for example) can really work wonders.

I could'nt agree more. Pilots need some sort of union protection.

Flyer00 04-09-2007 06:18 AM

Nobody is perfect 100% of the time...I know I'm not! I can't wait though to watch as some of these smug SJS wonder pilots vote down something that they don't totally comprehend. Then watch as it bites them in the ass when they are fired for whatever reason the company wants, or when the company screws with them during their next "negotiations". Maybe that might deflate some of those egos. :D

JetJock16 04-09-2007 06:46 AM


Originally Posted by Flyer00 (Post 146288)
Nobody is perfect 100% of the time...I know I'm not! I can't wait though to watch as some of these smug SJS wonder pilots vote down something that they don't totally comprehend. Then watch as it bites them in the ass when they are fired for whatever reason the company wants, or when the company screws with them during their next "negotiations". Maybe that might deflate some of those egos. :D

True or just wait till JA tries to merge the two pilot groups and ASA successfully (because their ALPA and we're SAPA "LOL":confused: ) negotiates a DOH merger with no fences. Once all those supper senior ASA pilots start taking the SJSers 1 1/2 to 2 year upgrade slots and they see their upgrade time fall to 3 - 3 1/2 years; they'll wish they had voted "YES!"

ghilis101 04-09-2007 11:05 AM

i kinda wish i was staying at SKW to see whats gonna happen with this. But ill continue to be an active ALPA supporter any way i can


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:56 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands