Hand flying: CRJ vs E175?
Yes, I'm old school. No, I'm not afraid of automation.
I've heard of some G-whiz operators that still encourage their drivers to hand-fly below 10k. So now I'm curious about the regional corner of the aviation sandbox. In comparing the typical CRJ and E-175 profile(s), could one expect to spend more/less hands-on time in one platform compared to the other? I'm guessing that this might be somewhat airline (but mostly) situation and workload dependent? NB: I ask because I'm interested in a regional that operates both aircraft types. And one of my considerations is: time spent flying the jet vs monitoring the automation vs programming the box. Many thanks to all, especially those that might be typed on both! |
200
I fly the CRJ200. my company only has a couple requirements where you MUST use automation or where you must handfly (PRM breakout)
I like to handfly departures until I getbstabilized in the 290kt climb, but it will vary depending o. where we are. if it's a notoriously busy departure area like white plains I'll get AP on right away just to make it easier on me and the captain on approaches I will usually let then ap take it through FAF on an ILS, but I really like handflying visual approaches as soon as we get around pattern altitude |
Originally Posted by SGS233
(Post 2627164)
Yes, I'm old school. No, I'm not afraid of automation.
I've heard of some G-whiz operators that still encourage their drivers to hand-fly below 10k. So now I'm curious about the regional corner of the aviation sandbox. In comparing the typical CRJ and E-175 profile(s), could one expect to spend more/less hands-on time in one platform compared to the other? I'm guessing that this might be somewhat airline (but mostly) situation and workload dependent? NB: I ask because I'm interested in a regional that operates both aircraft types. And one of my considerations is: time spent flying the jet vs monitoring the automation vs programming the box. Many thanks to all, especially those that might be typed on both! |
Originally Posted by word302
(Post 2627191)
I’ve flown both. I don’t know why how much you hand fly would ever be based on the equipment. They’re all just airplanes, fly them as much or as little as you want.
THIS^^ That said I have flown both and for hand flying i strongly prefer the CRJ. |
I hand flew the heck out of the E175 up to altitude all the time. Nice fine machine!
Now the E145 is garbage. Flies like crap. |
Having never flown the CRJ I’d say the ejet is a lot of fun to fly but if you aren’t careful it can turn you into a lazy pilot....especially with auto throttles. They are a nice option to have for those days when you want things a little easier but if you never turn them off.....don’t be surprised when you get an airplane where they don’t work and have a hard time managing airspeed.
Overall it’s an airplane though, nice and roomy......oh and has a lav up front....no more walk of shame :D |
Originally Posted by E175 Driver
(Post 2627210)
I hand flew the heck out of the E175 up to altitude all the time. Nice fine machine!
Now the E145 is garbage. Flies like crap. |
CRJs are a good bird to fly. I find that the 200s are responsive with banks vs the 700/900. CRJs do not have Autothrottles where as the E-175s do. I won't comment on how the E-Jets fly as I've never flown them.
At the end of the day, an airplane is an airplane. I wouldn't let the flying characteristics or automation determine where you should go. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by knewyork
(Post 2627223)
Says no one who actually ever flew the 145
|
Of all the reasons to pick one plane over another, this has to be the dumbest.
Pick the one with better trips, quicker upgrades, or more trips in your domicile. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:34 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands