![]() |
Originally Posted by coldpilot
(Post 150161)
You obviously have not heard about FITS. Check it out. Just go to the FAA website and do a search for FITS. You will get all kinds of information on it. It still hasn't quite caught on yet because in this industry it is very difficult to institute a change. We have been training pilots with a maneuver based system of training since the dawn of powered flight. Now there is a trend starting with major flight training institutions such as UND and ERAU to train pilots using a scenario based system of training. Do some homework on it. It is a much better way to train pilots.
There is no substitute for experience. -- A FITS instuctor. |
Originally Posted by coldpilot
(Post 150161)
You obviously have not heard about FITS. Check it out. Just go to the FAA website and do a search for FITS. You will get all kinds of information on it. It still hasn't quite caught on yet because in this industry it is very difficult to institute a change. We have been training pilots with a maneuver based system of training since the dawn of powered flight. Now there is a trend starting with major flight training institutions such as UND and ERAU to train pilots using a scenario based system of training. Do some homework on it. It is a much better way to train pilots.
|
Decision making
Just how much does 1000 more hours of touch and gos in a 152 really do to help someone prepare for airline command anyway? In my estimation it does nothing.
Plenty of low time pilots have been given command over the years and planes are not raining out of the sky. Almost always it is the crusty "know it all" old timer who drives it into the ground. SkyHigh |
Originally Posted by SkyHigh
(Post 150285)
Just how much does 1000 more hours of touch and gos in a 152 really do to help someone prepare for airline command anyway? In my estimation it does nothing.
Plenty of low time pilots have been given command over the years and planes are not raining out of the sky. Almost always it is the crusty "know it all" old timer who drives it into the ground. SkyHigh |
Well............. Im heding to CLE today, and by the looks of the TAF/METARS, Gusting to 35kts, LLWS, +RA, , I am glad I had 1,000 more hours doing touch & Goes, landing a 172/152 in gusty conditions makes a better pilot, I could care less what anybody has to say:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 150412)
Well............. Im heding to CLE today, and by the looks of the TAF/METARS, Gusting to 35kts, LLWS, +RA, , I am glad I had 1,000 more hours doing touch & Goes, landing a 172/152 in gusty conditions makes a better pilot, I could care less what anybody has to say:rolleyes:
|
delete post
|
Its not that doing thousands of touch and goes in a 172 makes you a better pilot or not...its what you see while your doing that. I could have left my instructor job last summer but I didnt cause I wanted to get more real world expierence. After dealing with thunderstorms, ice, mechanical failures, and some lower cielings that I flew in this past summer and fall have made me a much better pilot and Im glad i got that expierence.
|
flew with a member of my not so beautiful company's management the other day, who was explaining part of his hiring practice. While we'll basically hire anyone with a commercial/multi, he'd much prefer to hire a CFI, CFII, or MEI over just a standard 250 hr pilot, or even a 400-600 hr pilot if he hasn't been doing a flying job. So, even if the companies are willing to hire guys with bare mins, they'd still expect to see a little work experience in the related field before they come to the regionals.
|
Originally Posted by coldpilot
(Post 150161)
It still hasn't quite caught on yet because in this industry it is very difficult to institute a change.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands