Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

“1500 hour rule”

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2019, 09:42 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Default

Originally Posted by rswitz View Post
We appreciate the 1500 hour rule for what it did to our pay and rest regs, but not much else.

But then again, it made the industry starting pay based almost entirely on hiring standards. I'm not sure that's a healthy way of doing things long-term.

The general public thinks our industry is safer because the FO flew a 172 around the pattern 7,000 more times.

My opinion is that a 500 pilot can learn to fly an RJ just as well as a 1500 hour pilot.
That's like saying that a rookie QB can be just as good as Tom Brady with enough practice. Lol
Flyboy68 is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 10:03 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
On the one occasion I am aware of where the Navy allowed a third attempt bowing to political pressure the pilot killed herself on a carrier approach shortly after joining her fleet squadron.
Kara Hultgreen. I remember this well. The Navy still tries to deny that she was given special treatment. They said the accident was caused by a compressor stall of the port engine (which she caused by applying excessive rudder). Luckily her RIO punched out a millisecond before the aircraft went past 90° bank.

The video is online if you're interested.
Flyboy68 is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 12:00 AM
  #93  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,082
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68 View Post
Exactly.

Shut up and get your time to get hired and be damn happy you have the opportunity. When I graduated from college, the regionals required 2500 TT and 500 multi to get an interview to fly a Saab turboprop, and paid about $22,000 a year. They had FO's that qualified for food stamps.

I had to flight instruct for 2 years making nothing and then to Alaska to risk my life as a bush pilot for 15 months, then go back to instructing and flying charters and corporate before finally getting 2500 hours to get an FE job with a low rate cargo airline. Trust me, no older guys want to hear your sob stories.

This is like a millennial complaining to someone who grew up in the Depression about how hard they have it.
Amen to this lol.
I’ve been paving my own road brick by brick since ‘92 when I got my Private certificate.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 04:24 AM
  #94  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,212
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68 View Post
Kara Hultgreen. I remember this well. The Navy still tries to deny that she was given special treatment. They said the accident was caused by a compressor stall of the port engine (which she caused by applying excessive rudder). Luckily her RIO punched out a millisecond before the aircraft went past 90° bank.

The video is online if you're interested.
She wasn't the only one, and not the fault of the young ladies in question. They were along for the political ride. They probably would have been fine naval aviators on other platforms, but the tomcat was hard to land on the boat and hard to fight. And dangerous obviously.

I knew several RAG instructors whose careers were terminated because they refused to sign off women who were not up to the task. 100% success was expected of the women, but the historical pass rate was much lower... something had to give.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 04:52 AM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 33
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68 View Post
That's like saying that a rookie QB can be just as good as Tom Brady with enough practice. Lol
All depends on the quality of hours, I would take a fighter jock with 500 hours over a 1500 CFI any day of the week.
FlyinLion is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 05:23 AM
  #96  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68 View Post
Kara Hultgreen. I remember this well. The Navy still tries to deny that she was given special treatment. They said the accident was caused by a compressor stall of the port engine (which she caused by applying excessive rudder). Luckily her RIO punched out a millisecond before the aircraft went past 90° bank.

The video is online if you're interested.
The sick thing is in the Udver-Hazy museum in IAD there's a shrine to women pilots that is mostly KH's Navy stuff. Unbelievable.
Packrat is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 07:24 AM
  #97  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,481
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
She wasn't the only one, and not the fault of the young ladies in question. They were along for the political ride. They probably would have been fine naval aviators on other platforms, but the tomcat was hard to land on the boat and hard to fight. And dangerous obviously.

I knew several RAG instructors whose careers were terminated because they refused to sign off women who were not up to the task. 100% success was expected of the women, but the historical pass rate was much lower... something had to give.
I would like to say that the Air Force had too much integrity to let the gender of the aviator affect their opportunities for promotion, certification, advancement, etc.

I’d like to, but I can’t lie that well.

https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/y...ter-two-weeks/

And I’d agree, it’s NOT the fault of the young ladies. I’ve lost enough friends in tactical aviation to know you are doing them no favors lowering standards to create a poster girl to bolster your own career by showing you are PC.

Last edited by Excargodog; 03-03-2019 at 07:44 AM.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 07:27 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat View Post
The sick thing is in the Udver-Hazy museum in IAD there's a shrine to women pilots that is mostly KH's Navy stuff. Unbelievable.
Her tombstone should read, "Killed by affirmative action and social justice warriors."
Flyboy68 is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 09:34 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68 View Post
Dude, we were all chasing the dream of flying for a major, same as it is today. So what was I supposed to do? Tell all the guys I graduated with to quit flying so a select few of us could get good jobs? We didn't make the rules, we were just playing by them. It's just how it was. You graduated, you flight instructed, flew sightseeing, charters, skydivers, bush pilot, whatever you had to do to get at least 2500 hours to be considered for a shi**y regional job, make CA after several years and hopefully get hired by a major a couple years later. We all knew it was a long, hard road to the majors, but worth it in the end.

The only thing that's changed now is, it's not "a long, hard road". It's a couple of years of instructing.
Yeah that did come across a little dickish, my apologies. What I was trying to say, and let me try this again, is things are finally going the right direction for this career. For years, you were underpaid to do a job that although can be fun at times, comes with great responsibility. If a regional plane smokes a hole in the ground, the news covers it the same way they cover the major airlines. The level of responsibility is parallel, so the insane difference in payscales throughout the career has boggled my mind since the beginning of my career. I too had to take a low paying gig back in 2015 to get my time, I made 18k in 2015. My wife and I had to have a roommate to make rent, and we still managed to get into some debt in the 13 months my paychecks were 500 takehome. So maybe I was briefly part of the problem too, but my point was there shouldn’t be jobs paying that low. Yes one shouldn’t make 100k to fly a caravan or tech in a 172, but they shouldn’t have to starve either. So I have respect for those that refuse to take low paying jobs, they’re not being entitled babies, they just know the value of their training and job responsibilities.
Fixnem2Flyinem is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 09:43 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,588
Default

Originally Posted by Fixnem2Flyinem View Post
my point was there shouldn’t be jobs paying that low.
They pay what the market can bear. There is very little margin in the low end of aviation. One way to get around that is to get rid of anti-competitive regulations and allow more competition. This will allow higher profits with the smaller outfits and thus more wage competition too.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
DLax85
Cargo
99
12-16-2015 05:06 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
2
06-15-2012 07:14 AM
Razorback flyer
Major
17
06-13-2012 08:13 PM
Gordon C
Pilot Health
14
01-29-2007 05:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices