Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 02-12-2019, 07:29 PM   #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Default “1500 hour rule”

Now that we’re a little more than 5 years in since the “1500 hour rule” was enacted, I’m curious what other pilots opinions are on this regulation.

To Recap: This was enacted as a result of the Colgan Air 3407 crash. The one that revealed some of the truth of the regional airline industry to the public.

Was lack of experience, defined as logged flight-time, really the cause for this tragedy?

Soon after this new regulation took effect back in my CFI days, I was sitting down having lunch with an FAA ASI. I had to ask his opinion of it, expecting a canned answer. He nearly spit out his food, telling me this was the most useless legislation that won’t solve anything and essentially put into law to appease the families of the lost ones on the Colgan flight. I wasn’t expecting that response.

So what do you think... Did this really fix the problems of the regional industry?

Are the skies really that much safer now?

Do regionals still continue to get away with poor pilot treatment, regardless of union representation?
stabapch is offline  
Old 02-12-2019, 07:37 PM   #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,097
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stabapch View Post
Now that we’re a little more than 5 years in since the “1500 hour rule” was enacted, I’m curious what other pilots opinions are on this regulation.

To Recap: This was enacted as a result of the Colgan Air 3407 crash. The one that revealed some of the truth of the regional airline industry to the public.

Was lack of experience, defined as logged flight-time, really the cause for this tragedy?

Soon after this new regulation took effect back in my CFI days, I was sitting down having lunch with an FAA ASI. I had to ask his opinion of it, expecting a canned answer. He nearly spit out his food, telling me this was the most useless legislation that won’t solve anything and essentially put into law to appease the families of the lost ones on the Colgan flight. I wasn’t expecting that response.

So what do you think... Did this really fix the problems of the regional industry?

Are the skies really that much safer now?

Do regionals still continue to get away with poor pilot treatment, regardless of union representation?
The 1500 rule wasn't the only "fix" to come out of that crash. There was also Part 117 and a few other reforms. I think combined they have had an overall positive impact on the Regional industry. With the 1500 rule, when the Regionals started having trouble filling classes it forced them to start raising wages instead of lowering their hiring standards which they have done in the past, sometimes down to a wet commercial. The new Part 117 rules has done a lot to fight pilot fatigue. When I hear some of the stories about back in the day the more I appreciate these regulations.


Am I for getting rid of the 1500 rule? Absolutely not. I don't know if it does much for safety, but the extra experience can't hurt. But it has done wonders for pay in the Regional industry.
TheWeatherman is offline  
Old 02-12-2019, 07:46 PM   #3  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: 175 FO
Posts: 2,925
Default

The best thing about it was the increase in starting pay in the regionals and 117 rules. And PRIA, so you can't lie on your application as easily any more.

The pilots, both would get hired today(and CA would've already upgraded), and they probably had more relevant experience before their date of hire than a lot of CFI new hires today.
dera is online now  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:19 PM   #4  
Line Holder
 
WhiskyWhisky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Position: ATP
Posts: 68
Arrow Guaranteed

Get rid of the 1500 hour rule, and you get < $20,000/year wages back again. Guaranteed.


WhiskyWhisky is offline  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:23 PM   #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 3,899
Default

It’s also a 750 hour rule and a 1000 hour rule, or accurately, an ATP rule requiring airline pilots to possess an AIRLINE Tranport Pilot certificate.


GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:26 PM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 334
Default

I did a case report on that specific accident in college. It was crazy to look back and see the comments on threads chastising the FO for retracting the flaps when they had the tail stall. Today, that’s the proper recovery taught for that situation.

Regulatory wise I think the 117 rules are the best thing that came from it. “1500” hours though? My 1500 hours is different from yours. You could’ve been ready for the airlines at 500, whereas someone else won’t be ready until 2500. You can’t put a number on experiences in my opinion.
captande is offline  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:32 PM   #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captande View Post
I did a case report on that specific accident in college. It was crazy to look back and see the comments on threads chastising the FO for retracting the flaps when they had the tail stall. Today, that’s the proper recovery taught for that situation.

Regulatory wise I think the 117 rules are the best thing that came from it. “1500” hours though? My 1500 hours is different from yours. You could’ve been ready for the airlines at 500, whereas someone else won’t be ready until 2500. You can’t put a number on experiences in my opinion.
You did a whole case study on that accident report and you don’t know that they had a normal stall and not a tail stall?
DarkSideMoon is online now  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:34 PM   #8  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: 175 FO
Posts: 2,925
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captande View Post
I did a case report on that specific accident in college. It was crazy to look back and see the comments on threads chastising the FO for retracting the flaps when they had the tail stall. Today, that’s the proper recovery taught for that situation.
da fuq? Sounds like a great report.
dera is online now  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:46 PM   #9  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon View Post
You did a whole case study on that accident report and you don’t know that they had a normal stall and not a tail stall?
Hahaha. Greatest comment ever. Great college, that one.
ChecklistMonkey is offline  
Old 02-12-2019, 08:53 PM   #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captande View Post
I did a case report on that specific accident in college. It was crazy to look back and see the comments on threads chastising the FO for retracting the flaps when they had the tail stall. Today, that’s the proper recovery taught for that situation
What grade did you get? They didn’t have a tailplane stall.

Dera, PRIA was around well before this.

1500 has been neutered by big money lobbyists. So the inspector was right.
Today the inexperience in the right seat is glaring. Most want to learn. Some really worry me.
captive apple is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? Guard Dude Delta 198633 11-14-2019 08:57 AM
FDX/UPS - Timing is Everything! DLax85 Cargo 99 12-16-2015 06:06 AM
Got questions about the block hour ratio? Bill Lumberg Major 2 06-15-2012 08:14 AM
UAL block hour ratio Razorback flyer Major 17 06-13-2012 09:13 PM
24 Hour Fitness membership Gordon C Pilot Health 14 01-29-2007 06:29 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM.