Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Regional lifers. Why are they stuck? >

Regional lifers. Why are they stuck?

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Regional lifers. Why are they stuck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2019, 03:22 PM
  #261  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
Probably because they worked at Atlas...
Probably because they flew night freight.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 04-06-2019, 03:26 PM
  #262  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by Long Landing View Post
The Minneapolis thing is taken out of context. What I meant by it is I didn’t want to commute farther than Minneapolis but wouldn’t rule out the west coast. But whatever. Either way I was not trying to be condescending nor was I trying to give life advice. Everyone has their reasoning behind their logic. What I am saying was that this is, from my experience and what I do, what is looked for and makes people stand out. I guess I didn’t necessarily come off as well as I intended too. What I was trying to state was that it is a well rounded employee that they’re looking for not just quantity of total time/PIC. And by the same token if you do a ton of volunteering but also lack in areas such as total time/PIC or have a low college GPA then you are equally not as marketable.

I don’t argue with people who stay at a regional for their career. The regionals aren’t a terrible career in today’s world. 10 years ago I wouldn’t ever imagine wanting to spend my life at any of these places but I understand that people didn’t have a choice. The point I was trying to get at was a good amount of posts were aimed at people who are young and don’t understand what those “before us” went through and don’t deserve to be in the positions they are. Like I said I work for a regional. I know people younger than me with less time and experience picked up by a major airline. I don’t look down on them but rather I say “what can I do that they did to help me get hired too.”

You’re right maybe I am young and don’t understand anything about the world. But I also know that going through life miserable about where you are and everything else that is going on around you is no way at all to live.

(And for the guy concerned about paragraphs there ya go. Didn’t realize it was all that important as I’m posting from my phone...)
LOL at low college GPAs. Because all colleges and degrees are the same, GPA is a good measure
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 04-06-2019, 06:05 PM
  #263  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,127
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
Given that the top of the list has been here since the early 80's and haven't flowed, I doubt that was ever the case.
Happy to be corrected if that's not how it was.
No, he is correct. There was debate back when AA first started hiring if guys who had been issued AA-APA pilot seniority numbers (each of which created a position for a flowback) HAD to or must flow, or if they could elect a second time, throw away their number, and decide to stay. It very much was a big debate at the time. He’s correct, it was a big thing.
In the end, nobody was forced.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 04-06-2019, 06:07 PM
  #264  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,127
Default

Originally Posted by ICUROOK View Post
There is not going to be another downturn, at least not one as bad as 2008, for a long time.
Industry downturn was 2001..... it continued with the economic issues of 2008.... hence the saying, lost decade.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 04-06-2019, 06:10 PM
  #265  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,127
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
That's true today. In the old days the flow was mandatory, and AA mainline also forced you to upgrade when you were senior enough, ie couldn't camp out at the top of the FO list.
Flow was never mandatory.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 04-07-2019, 05:04 PM
  #266  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
Flow was never mandatory.
I know there were people forced to flow involuntarily at one point. Not sure what the genesis of that was.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-07-2019, 06:33 PM
  #267  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I know there were people forced to flow involuntarily at one point. Not sure what the genesis of that was.
That was them complaining. “Forced” is a loose term they used because they already made the decision and wanted to change it later in the game. It was a one time choice.

Typical babies wanting 2 bites of the apple.
MySaabStory is offline  
Old 04-07-2019, 07:30 PM
  #268  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,253
Default

Originally Posted by MySaabStory View Post
That was them complaining. “Forced” is a loose term they used because they already made the decision and wanted to change it later in the game. It was a one time choice.

Typical babies wanting 2 bites of the apple.
Ah. So they had to elect flow well in advance of the actual flow opportunity? And regretted it when their number came up?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-07-2019, 07:38 PM
  #269  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Ah. So they had to elect flow well in advance of the actual flow opportunity? And regretted it when their number came up?
Yes. In all fairness they had to make the choice years in advance...sometimes many years. In that time some people had their circumstances in life change and felt “forced” to flow.
MySaabStory is offline  
Old 04-09-2019, 01:27 PM
  #270  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer View Post
ARE YOU KIDDING? Obviously you’ve never been through the few recessions of the last 25 years. And no, even the regionals weren’t hiring during the worst of economic downturns. I remember I couldn’t even get a CFI job. So spare me. And please don’t deny another economic downturn nor berate another for playing it conservative by staying at a regional.
Even during the 2008 recession there was at least 2 regionals hiring continuously throughout the lowest of the low. Colgan, Republic, Mesa/Go Jets and Skywest were filling classes. Cfi jobs were also easy pickings for anyone with decent experience. So again this victim attitude doesn't work. If you want a job there are always going to be regional jobs to put food on the table. They may not be in your choice of domicile or the most attractive but there were jobs available continuously throughout 2007-2011. If you werent able to get hired as a cfi you were probably underqualified at that time.

Staying at a regional because you are afraid of another downturn is idiotic. A regional job is easily replaceable and is in itself no way secure. Work for an airline that writes thechecks.
Aquaticus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chuck D
Regional
51
09-23-2014 07:08 AM
PilotAnalyst
Regional
18
10-22-2012 01:39 PM
groovinaviator
Regional
24
02-11-2008 03:34 PM
papacharlie
Regional
39
01-27-2008 05:01 PM
ryane946
Major
12
10-09-2006 05:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices