Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Where does Delta currently have the 900's going out of SLC and ATL? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/12346-where-does-delta-currently-have-900s-going-out-slc-atl.html)

PinnacleFO 05-02-2007 08:13 PM

Where does Delta currently have the 900's going out of SLC and ATL?
 
Just curious

diamnd15 05-02-2007 08:38 PM

i know of one flight from slc to stl on the 900

copcar1988 05-02-2007 09:33 PM

SLC - MEM as well

higney85 05-03-2007 06:12 AM


Originally Posted by copcar1988 (Post 159321)
SLC - MEM as well

Isn't that about a 3 hour flight? That would be miserable. I get antsy going mem-bos (about 3hrs), I could only imagine how bad it would be in the back!

PinnacleFO 05-03-2007 06:26 AM

i have heard they do YYZ SLC and PIT SLC which has to approach 4 hours

ghilis101 05-03-2007 07:26 AM

yea imagine that return flight from toronto to SLC. i cant believe the passengers havent revolted yet

If you have to go back to pee more than once on an RJ, then an RJ shouldnt be flying that leg!

RedBaron007 05-03-2007 07:57 AM

Yeah, I remember reading the press release about where they were going to be flying out of SLC and was amazed anyone would even consider flying an RJ that far. I wouldn't want to fly on one as a passenger for 4 hours.

ghilis101 05-03-2007 09:10 AM

if the wx bad and you need an alternate, how many pax would you need to leave at the gate n toronto to get back to SLC?

PinnacleFO 05-03-2007 09:21 AM

i have heard none

IHateMgmt 05-03-2007 09:54 AM

Kindda depends on where the alternate is.

ghilis101 05-03-2007 03:06 PM

ok so if you got this:

BOW: 47,000 lbs(not sure how close i am on this one)
Max 76 PAX at 190 lbs winter: 14,440
Max Fwd and Aft Cargo Worst case: 5,440

ZFW: 66,880 if my BOW was correct (Max ZFW allowable is 70,750)

Max T/O is 84,500, so this means you can take 17,620 lbs fuel - (Max allowed on board is 19,594)


call it a 5 hour flight at 3500 lbs/hr = 17,500 lb burn (this is an overly conservative burn that incorporates landing with reserves)

hmmm it looks close but then again there probably wont be that much cargo on board

ExperimentalAB 05-03-2007 03:24 PM

XJet flies YYZ-IAH nearly four hours there in the 145-XLR. Now THAT is craziness...

ss278 05-03-2007 06:31 PM


Originally Posted by RedBaron007 (Post 159458)
..... I wouldn't want to fly on one as a passenger for 4 hours.


I have. And no, you wouldn't.

Go Ugly Early 05-03-2007 07:01 PM

The problem on the longer legs (PIT-SLC, YYZ-SLC) is not how much payload you can carry, but how much fuel. The 900 has the exact same fuel tank capacity as the 700 and often times cannot do YYZ-SLC with headwinds and an alternate. Dropping payload doesn't do anything to get more fuel on because the tanks are already full. We've had to stop in MSP, MCI, and ICT a few times to get fuel.

Ellen 05-03-2007 09:36 PM


Originally Posted by Go Ugly Early (Post 159741)
The problem on the longer legs (PIT-SLC, YYZ-SLC) is not how much payload you can carry, but how much fuel. The 900 has the exact same fuel tank capacity as the 700 and often times cannot do YYZ-SLC with headwinds and an alternate. Dropping payload doesn't do anything to get more fuel on because the tanks are already full. We've had to stop in MSP, MCI, and ICT a few times to get fuel.

Interesting. Not so economical then to leave the FL's to hit pavement and gas up only to burn it again going back up. Time for longer range airplane. Sounds like it was a nice try.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands