Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Scope... It’s time?

Old 03-14-2020, 06:25 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Flymeaway View Post
This is when management has all the leverage. We lost $300 million this month. Give in on scope or take a pay cut.
A pay cut at a mainline airline is WAY better than giving up on scope. We’ve all seen that movie. It was awful. I think that the vast majority of legacy pilots would much rather take a pay cut than relax scope and outsource even more jobs. I’m looking at a 40% cut since flying on my fleet has been slashed due to the international restrictions, but scope relief isn’t even on the table.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 06:39 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,091
Default

Originally Posted by iceman21 View Post
Does that make financial business sense? How many pilots are going you have to be trained? Pay rates negotiated or do the guys/gals displaced from larger airframes paid their current rates? Who is gonna do the training? New Ops specs and procedures written? Etc.
It has nothing really to do with pilot costs, it more to do with "me too" type work groups. Example, FAs at mainline start at $35/hr and top out at $70/hr plus 10% 401k. At regionals it's around $18/hr top out $40 plus how many senior mama's are at regionals? It's a dead end job that few do more than a couple years. Same goes for dispatchers, pay is about half at the regional level than mainline...ground crew...$12/hr no benefits contracted to work regional flights but when mainline sends in "mainline" airplanes guess what scope clauses kick in and now that is a $35/hr mainline employee working the gate and ramp (don't believe me? Their contracts are all available online). Contract maintenance is cheap at outstations, here at AA we even have maintenance workers who are employed to fix jetways and facilities around our stations.

When you send an "RJ" in (ie outsourced flying) all of that goes away and you can play one contract work group off the other.

There is zero chance smaller airplanes will be flown by "mainline" pilots in the future. It's not even worth contemplating.
Name User is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 07:08 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by Name User View Post
It has nothing really to do with pilot costs, it more to do with "me too" type work groups. Example, FAs at mainline start at $35/hr and top out at $70/hr plus 10% 401k. At regionals it's around $18/hr top out $40 plus how many senior mama's are at regionals? It's a dead end job that few do more than a couple years. Same goes for dispatchers, pay is about half at the regional level than mainline...ground crew...$12/hr no benefits contracted to work regional flights but when mainline sends in "mainline" airplanes guess what scope clauses kick in and now that is a $35/hr mainline employee working the gate and ramp (don't believe me? Their contracts are all available online). Contract maintenance is cheap at outstations, here at AA we even have maintenance workers who are employed to fix jetways and facilities around our stations.

When you send an "RJ" in (ie outsourced flying) all of that goes away and you can play one contract work group off the other.

There is zero chance smaller airplanes will be flown by "mainline" pilots in the future. It's not even worth contemplating.
It has EVERYTHING to do with pilot costs, which are included in the overall contract labor cost savings. “Me too” type work groups? You mean the ones that do IDENTICAL jobs physically/mentally and share 100 percent of the responsibility without the employment protections/benefits/compensation as their peers?

And AA does fly regional jets. What do you think an ‘ERJ’ 190 is? We can also add DL in that category now as well with their new little airplanes.
Burt123 is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 08:16 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,280
Default

Originally Posted by Burt123 View Post
It has EVERYTHING to do with pilot costs, which are included in the overall contract labor cost savings. “Me too” type work groups? You mean the ones that do IDENTICAL jobs physically/mentally and share 100 percent of the responsibility without the employment protections/benefits/compensation as their peers?

And AA does fly regional jets. What do you think an ‘ERJ’ 190 is? We can also add DL in that category now as well with their new little airplanes.
daaayaaaam son! mic drop
LoneStar32 is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 08:28 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Here and there
Posts: 1,906
Default

Originally Posted by trip View Post
One other thing that would concern me if I were at x Legacy is the LCC’s like Spirit who are going to charge full speed ahead and capture markets with the legacy draw down.

I believe this to be nonsense. U/LCCs will be impacted on a similar level as demand continues to drops. Furthermore, the legacy drawdowns will be designed to be stood back up very quickly to protect those valuable markets. The main thing that matters is cash and which of these players have enough or at least good access to more as time goes on. I don’t see any one airline or group of airlines having an advantage right now in the short term. It will most likely truly be survival of the fittest.
WhiskeyDelta is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 10:36 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Originally Posted by WhiskeyDelta View Post
I believe this to be nonsense. U/LCCs will be impacted on a similar level as demand continues to drops. Furthermore, the legacy drawdowns will be designed to be stood back up very quickly to protect those valuable markets. The main thing that matters is cash and which of these players have enough or at least good access to more as time goes on. I don’t see any one airline or group of airlines having an advantage right now in the short term. It will most likely truly be survival of the fittest.
You're right, i don't think we (at Spirit) is going after the legacies market. We are barely holding on to our own market. However, it's easier for us to sell $20 tickets and not bet hurt as much, and people will still fly for a good deal. Those canceled events doesn't hurt us as much since we don't really cater to the business travelers. The biggest issue for us right now is, how long before Mickey's house opens back up, and when will cruise ships start to sail out of FLL again. At least Vegas is still dealing cards. I don't have the exact number but the amount of cash on hand compared to debt is much better at Spirit than most airlines.
Silver02ex is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 11:12 AM
  #17  
Eating A Gruben
 
sanicom3205's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,065
Default

Originally Posted by Burt123 View Post
And AA does fly regional jets. What do you think an ‘ERJ’ 190 is? We can also add DL in that category now as well with their new little airplanes.
For what it's worth, Embraer refers to it as an E190. Same with the E170. Falls right in line with the Republic mainline mentality y'all have going here.

Originally Posted by Burt123 View Post
LOL, we’ll see how much mainline management holds up to those scope clauses. They’re not going to keep empty 737’s flying routes they can easily replace with an RJ, much cheaper. Managements job is to hold the bottom line and if that means replacing mainline routes with cheaper RJs and furloughing pilots to keep the profits flowing and shareholders happy they won’t hesitate. History will repeat itself.
Besides, you're the LAST guy that should be in a conversation about scope. We'd be flying your shiny jets hub to hub if you had your way.
sanicom3205 is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 11:25 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,091
Default

Originally Posted by Burt123 View Post
It has EVERYTHING to do with pilot costs, which are included in the overall contract labor cost savings. “Me too” type work groups? You mean the ones that do IDENTICAL jobs physically/mentally and share 100 percent of the responsibility without the employment protections/benefits/compensation as their peers?

And AA does fly regional jets. What do you think an ‘ERJ’ 190 is? We can also add DL in that category now as well with their new little airplanes.
Pilots make more as seats increase.

FAs? Their cost is the same and doesn't matter if they are serving a pax on a CRJ or 777. Same with mechanics...that seat repair doesn't scale because the plane they are working on carries more pax. Same with rampers...a bag is a bag. Gate agents...yep you guessed it, that pax is the same regardless of aircraft size. If you could argue that a gate agent for mainline can board twice or three times as many pax than a contracted agent, you'd have a point...

The way our economy works, productivity drives income growth. You can't have sustainable income growth without productivity gains.

Airline unions have tried but all that results is additional outsourcing.
Name User is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 11:53 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by Burt123 View Post
It has EVERYTHING to do with pilot costs, which are included in the overall contract labor cost savings. “Me too” type work groups? You mean the ones that do IDENTICAL jobs physically/mentally and share 100 percent of the responsibility without the employment protections/benefits/compensation as their peers?

And AA does fly regional jets. What do you think an ‘ERJ’ 190 is? We can also add DL in that category now as well with their new little airplanes.
This recurring line gets old. Yes regional pilots do the same job as legacy pilots, but regional pilots saying stuff like this is like players of a farm team saying that they do IDENTICAL jobs as players for the Yankees, but with less pay and benefits. The difference is that one person plays for a farm team, and the other for a major league team. All of the players are highly skilled, however, each player negotiates with the team that he plays for and will obtain vastly different results accordingly. Regional pilots will never make what legacy pilots do, and legacy pilots should not forget where they came from, or look down on others who have not been as fortunate. People are scared to go to baseball games now and the stands will be empty for both teams until this is over. There are plenty of reductions to go around. Stay safe, healthy, and good luck.
Itsajob is offline  
Old 03-14-2020, 02:22 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,280
Default

Originally Posted by Itsajob View Post
This recurring line gets old. Yes regional pilots do the same job as legacy pilots, but regional pilots saying stuff like this is like players of a farm team saying that they do IDENTICAL jobs as players for the Yankees, but with less pay and benefits. The difference is that one person plays for a farm team, and the other for a major league team. All of the players are highly skilled, however, each player negotiates with the team that he plays for and will obtain vastly different results accordingly. Regional pilots will never make what legacy pilots do, and legacy pilots should not forget where they came from, or look down on others who have not been as fortunate. People are scared to go to baseball games now and the stands will be empty for both teams until this is over. There are plenty of reductions to go around. Stay safe, healthy, and good luck.
lol at comparing regional and major pilots to minor and major league baseball. Not even close.
LoneStar32 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UAL T38 Phlyer
United
24
12-28-2023 09:38 PM
Stimpy the Kat
Kalitta Companies
77
12-03-2016 08:24 AM
Squawk87
Aviation Law
23
09-24-2016 07:08 PM
Cheddar
United
98
05-30-2013 04:51 AM
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices