Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Mesaba CRJ 900 Pictures (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/13517-mesaba-crj-900-pictures.html)

boeingt7 06-10-2007 04:41 PM

Mesaba CRJ 900 Pictures
 
Hey, just wondering if anyone has any pictures or links of Mesaba's new crj 900. I've heard that it looks pretty sharp. Thanks!

ExperimentalAB 06-10-2007 05:49 PM

ALL CRJ-900's look Sharp!

KiloAlpha 06-10-2007 05:51 PM

Umm... no

They look goofy as shlt

ExperimentalAB 06-10-2007 05:52 PM

Goofier than a -200?? No way!

KiloAlpha 06-10-2007 05:59 PM

To each their own I suppose :o

warriordriver 06-10-2007 06:06 PM

you sir, are incorrect.....
 

Originally Posted by boeingt7 (Post 178222)
Hey, just wondering if anyone has any pictures or links of Mesaba's new crj 900. I've heard that it looks pretty sharp. Thanks!


http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/sh...ghlight=mesaba

try this link, if it doesnt work, then do a search for mesaba, and its under the mesaba new hires thread. and yes, it does look pretty sharp :rolleyes:

ExperimentalAB 06-10-2007 06:28 PM

Couldn't find it there, but here is a good link:

http://home.businesswire.com/portal/...34&newsLang=en

P.S. The Red should be a little lower on the tail I think too!

P.P.S. SHARP, SHARP, SHARP!!

FlyerJosh 06-10-2007 06:36 PM

The -900 looks like a metal pipe with wings. From the inside it looks like a flying coffin...

The -200 looks nose heavy and stumpy.

IMO, the 700 is the best looking (and best derivative) of the bunch.

That said, I'd rather take an E170/190 over the CRJ series any day...

boeingt7 06-10-2007 06:36 PM

ok thanks, it does look pretty good

JoeyMeatballs 06-10-2007 07:22 PM

whats the pay on this "sharp" looking airplane, I'd rather fly a shorts 360 is it paid more :)

otter 06-10-2007 07:47 PM


Originally Posted by SAABaroowski (Post 178323)
whats the pay on this "sharp" looking airplane, I'd rather fly a shorts 360 is it paid more :)

Sure bring up the whole pay thing, like it matters!!!

freezingflyboy 06-10-2007 08:01 PM

Looks like a DC-9 to me... I bet the W-2s don't match though:rolleyes:

JoeyMeatballs 06-10-2007 08:09 PM


Originally Posted by otter (Post 178338)
Sure bring up the whole pay thing, like it matters!!!

well I mean honestly yea it "looks" nice but what the hell does that matter?

otter 06-10-2007 08:23 PM


Originally Posted by SAABaroowski (Post 178355)
well I mean honestly yea it "looks" nice but what the hell does that matter?

It does look nice, however, it would look even better if mainline were flying it.

JoeyMeatballs 06-10-2007 08:25 PM


Originally Posted by otter (Post 178365)
It does look nice, however, it would look even better if mainline were flying it.

quote of the day my friend..............good point

flynavyj 06-10-2007 08:28 PM

yep, my thought was...looks like a mainline airplane to me, should have mainline pay, and flown by mainline pilots...but we'll fight for whatever we can to get that buck and hour pay raise for the extra 20 seats.

ExperimentalAB 06-10-2007 09:00 PM


Originally Posted by SAABaroowski (Post 178355)
well I mean honestly yea it "looks" nice but what the hell does that matter?

Of course Aesthetics matters!!

Analogy:

- Pilot at bar hunts down most attractive female.
- Pilot at airport hunts down most attractive aircraft.

Duh...LoL

PinnacleFO 06-11-2007 04:26 AM

That tail looks rediculous. It is painted lower on the 200.

Ftrooppilot 06-11-2007 04:27 AM


Originally Posted by SAABaroowski (Post 178323)
whats the pay on this "sharp" looking airplane, I'd rather fly a shorts 360 is it paid more :)

Anyone who "wants" to fly a Shorts aircraft needs serious counseling. :cool:

fosters 06-11-2007 05:26 AM


Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot (Post 178437)
Anyone who "wants" to fly a Shorts aircraft needs serious counseling. :cool:

Those are some pretty cool planes, part of the original "commuter" aircraft fleet. They're perfect freight aircraft now.

I agree with those that are against -900's. I'm actually not so against them at the regional level, but I am against the fact that their pay scale is so ridiculously low. They are direct mainline replacement aircraft. Although we all did it, by applying and accepting the low pay.

G2TT 06-11-2007 07:14 AM


Originally Posted by fosters (Post 178450)
I'm actually not so against them at the regional level, but I am against the fact that their pay scale is so ridiculously low. They are direct mainline replacement aircraft. Although we all did it, by applying and accepting the low pay.

Translates into: "This thing is huge!!!!! It's way better than those little prop things I could have gotten assigned to. I wonder what kind of ramen noodles I should eat tonight? I hope there will be mainline jobs available in the future, anyway, I'll worry about that later. At least I'm not flight instructing!"

bizzum 06-11-2007 07:29 AM


Originally Posted by G2TT (Post 178503)
Translates into: "This thing is huge!!!!! It's way better than those little prop things I could have gotten assigned to. I wonder what kind of ramen noodles I should eat tonight? I hope there will be mainline jobs available in the future, anyway, I'll worry about that later. At least I'm not flight instructing!"

A-FREAKIN-MEN!

BoilerUP 06-11-2007 07:51 AM

First question: anybody here know the meaning of "80 for 80"?

Second question: anybody know how many seats NWA's DC-9-10/15s had?

According to information available on APC....

A 2nd year Mesaba CR9 FO would earn 49% of a 2nd year DC-9 FO's hourly payrate at Northwest, while a 2nd year Compass E175 FO would earn 60% of the mainline hourly rate.

A 12th year Mesaba CR9 captain will earn 66% of a 12th year DC-9 captain's hourly rate at Northwest, while a 12th year Compass E175 CA (which does not exist) would earn 68.5% of the mainline hourly rate.

I know that the 900s are basically Avro replacements for Mesaba. I also know that I want my regional airline to grow and that likely won't happen without larger aircraft. Even knowing that, I cringe every time I see a 900 or E175...because I know that we (as regional pilots) are replacing mainline jobs, flying "RJs" the same size as former mainline planes, on mainline routes, for a mere fraction of mainline pay.

Sanchez 06-11-2007 10:02 AM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 178518)
First question: anybody here know the meaning of "80 for 80"?

Second question: anybody know how many seats NWA's DC-9-10/15s had?

According to information available on APC....

A 2nd year Mesaba CR9 FO would earn 49% of a 2nd year DC-9 FO's hourly payrate at Northwest, while a 2nd year Compass E175 FO would earn 60% of the mainline hourly rate.

A 12th year Mesaba CR9 captain will earn 66% of a 12th year DC-9 captain's hourly rate at Northwest, while a 12th year Compass E175 CA (which does not exist) would earn 68.5% of the mainline hourly rate.

I know that the 900s are basically Avro replacements for Mesaba. I also know that I want my regional airline to grow and that likely won't happen without larger aircraft. Even knowing that, I cringe every time I see a 900 or E175...because I know that we (as regional pilots) are replacing mainline jobs, flying "RJs" the same size as former mainline planes, on mainline routes, for a mere fraction of mainline pay.

I agree with you. I find hard to believe that folks are rejoicing at a CRJ900 that is clearly replacing mainline flying...without even the paycheck to go with it. I'm sure the Northwest guys are absolutely thrilled to see this.

p1kraft 06-13-2007 03:41 PM

Ok so its obvious the regionals are going crazy with hiring due to growth apparently picking up mainline flying. So are the majors just not going to be doing much hiring due to some runs being given to regionals at half the labor cost? Or are the majors picking up stuff elsewhere?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands