![]() |
Regionals being wiped out with major hiring?
So my company came out with an article saying the majors will be hiring 10k pilots next year. 8k will come from regionals.
by my napkin math there’s about 16k regional pilots out there. Could this 2022 hiring spree by majors wipe out half of the regionals? seems pretty crazy to me. How will this look? My regional is expected to lose about half our pilots next year (300/800). And we can only hire and train 5% of our group per month (40/800). what will this look like in a year? |
Originally Posted by Erjpilot90
(Post 3306482)
So my company came out with an article saying the majors will be hiring 10k pilots next year. 8k will come from regionals.
by my napkin math there’s about 16k regional pilots out there. Could this 2022 hiring spree by majors wipe out half of the regionals? seems pretty crazy to me. How will this look? My regional is expected to lose about half our pilots next year (300/800). And we can only hire and train 5% of our group per month (40/800). what will this look like in a year? The real problem is captains. The majors will be taking the captains at a much higher rate than FOs. Even if there were 16,000 regional pilots that were qualified for the majors, 1/2 of them are captains and will be gone in a year. I said it before and I will say it again - if you are a captain at a regional today, you should be able to be at a major airline within the next 14 months. If you are a regional FO, get as many hours as you can and make sure your apps are in and update them weekly. You will be at a major very soon. |
Could happen. If push comes to shoves, majors will prioritize manning mainline over regionals.
Likely result would be regional consolidation, since many cannot shrink and still have enough economy of scale to make it work. Mainline can get out of contracts at will when regionals fail to perform. |
A massive buyout of SkyWest and/or Republic would be a “checkmate” move. Capture the pilots, aircrafts, simulators, training department who knows how to turn CFI’s into 121 pilots. Oh, they’ll have to pay for that move (no more regional pay scale gap?), and they’ll take on more risk, but desperate times will require desperate measures. That’s if the hype you all are claiming on the shortage becomes a real thing.
I remember sitting in my Aviation class, first day of college back in the Fall of 2011 hearing our professors push the shortage hype, “oh it’s coming”, 10 years later “it’s coming”, well we’ll see. I’d be thrilled to see my seniority number jump 10-25% with a massive regional buyout by UAL, it would also give me confidence with job security. But I’m still skeptical on the hype. |
Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill
(Post 3306497)
A massive buyout of SkyWest and/or Republic would be a “checkmate” move. Capture the pilots, aircrafts, simulators, training department who knows how to turn CFI’s into 121 pilots. Oh, they’ll have to pay for that move (no more regional pay scale gap?), and they’ll take on more risk, but desperate times will require desperate measures. That’s if the hype you all are claiming on the shortage becomes a real thing.
I remember sitting in my Aviation class, first day of college back in 2011 hearing our professors push the shortage hype, “oh it’s coming”, 10 years later “it’s coming”, well we’ll see. |
https://i.ibb.co/71r0wJn/D02-CC5-E3-...22-C6-F521.jpg
https://www.realclearpolitics.com Or, we could be heading for another lost decade with $200 oil, a depressed economy, and the bottom third of the major seniority lists furloughed. It’s a cyclical business and recession and stagflation has happened before. That’s life. You pay your money and take your chances… West Texas Intermediate crude futures, the U.S. oil benchmark, crossed $80 per barrel on Friday for the first time since November 2014 as demand rebounds while supply remains tight. The U.S. oil benchmark jumped more than 2% to trade as high as $80.09 on Friday, before easing from that level and hovering around $79.70 at 11:30am on Wall Street. Brent crude, the international benchmark, advanced 1.7% to $83.32 per barrel. Oil prices have surged in recent days alongside a broader rally in commodities including natural gas and coal amid an energy crunch that’s sweeping Europe and Asia |
Originally Posted by Erjpilot90
(Post 3306482)
seems pretty crazy to me. How will this look? the 50 seat carriers will go first. Air whiskey is my bet, as both PSA and the rest of the world lures their pilots. Probably will start seeing “$50 per 121 hour logged” type signing bonuses A really devious major move would be to buy a couple small regionals and just shut them down to flood the market temporarily, but it could happen organically as well |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3306510)
https://i.ibb.co/71r0wJn/D02-CC5-E3-...22-C6-F521.jpg
https://www.realclearpolitics.com Or, we could be heading for another lost decade with $200 oil, a depressed economy, and the bottom third of the major seniority lists furloughed. It’s a cyclical business and recession and stagflation has happened before. That’s life. You pay your money and take your chances… Meanwhile, APC commentators are already convinced they’ll be hiring like crazy for the next decade. |
Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill
(Post 3306516)
Meanwhile, APC commentators are already convinced they’ll be hiring like crazy for the next decade.
They are also afraid of not having the sim capacity to handle a future demand surge coinciding with known retirements so they may even be "investing" in pilots to avoid getting caught later, even if they have some uncertainty. |
Originally Posted by Erjpilot90
(Post 3306482)
So my company came out with an article saying the majors will be hiring 10k pilots next year. 8k will come from regionals.
by my napkin math there’s about 16k regional pilots out there. Could this 2022 hiring spree by majors wipe out half of the regionals? seems pretty crazy to me. How will this look? My regional is expected to lose about half our pilots next year (300/800). And we can only hire and train 5% of our group per month (40/800). what will this look like in a year? I am very optimistic about the future for those that are just starting their flying careers. My own 37-year career has been full of both triumphs and disappointments. I've seen numerous recessions, several pandemics (not just Covid), furloughs, airline consolidation, 9/11, and the change in the retirement age from 60 to 65 - all of which impacted my job. People starting their airline careers now should be prepared for the occasional career setback and have a positive attitude about it. No matter how bad things get, there's always something you can be doing to improve your qualifications and position yourself for a better job. The most important advice I can give a newbie? No matter how much you like flying, it's still a JOB - a way to pay the rent and put food on the table. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3306498)
the shortage was here in the late 2010s and is back again. You can see this in pay rates and bonus offerings. It absolutely happened and is happening.
Also the regionals should be aware they need to do better with pay, yet even now the “desperate” shops offer peanuts straight pay and a sucker bonus. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3306554)
The big three, UPS, and FDX could shrink and still need to hire due to retirements.
They are also afraid of not having the sim capacity to handle a future demand surge coinciding with known retirements so they may even be "investing" in pilots to avoid getting caught later, even if they have some uncertainty. |
Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill
(Post 3306571)
All that sounds great, but if we have a hyperinflation event, all bets are off the table.
It would have to be massive to see a sustained impact. Otherwise it looks to be a sustained very tight pilot marked. |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3306576)
Black swan events can have an impact. Anything minor will be obliterated with massive retirements this decade.
It would have to be massive to see a sustained impact. Otherwise it looks to be a sustained very tight pilot marked. |
This is sorta more than a pilot market event.
this is a “how many pilots can be sustainably harvested from the regionals” event. The industry has had 30 years of bankruptcies and terror attacks and recessions and reg changes and finally now a pandemic keeping a lid on its fundamental staffing problem. New hires aren’t really the problem. It’s keeping them around long enough to be captains and line check airmen. Four years is really an absolute minimum… which means that a 20,000 pilot industry can provide at most 5,000 hires per year. And that is if the hiring and getting-to-1000 and upgrade machine is humming. But more likely hiring 5000 in a year … who will be mostly captains and LCA’s will collapse the system. Still 15,000 regional pilots but not the ones they need in the right place. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3306601)
This is sorta more than a pilot market event.
this is a “how many pilots can be sustainably harvested from the regionals” event. The industry has had 30 years of bankruptcies and terror attacks and recessions and reg changes and finally now a pandemic keeping a lid on its fundamental staffing problem. New hires aren’t really the problem. It’s keeping them around long enough to be captains and line check airmen. Four years is really an absolute minimum… which means that a 20,000 pilot industry can provide at most 5,000 hires per year. And that is if the hiring and getting-to-1000 and upgrade machine is humming. But more likely hiring 5000 in a year … who will be mostly captains and LCA’s will collapse the system. Still 15,000 regional pilots but not the ones they need in the right place. |
I expect the bottom tier regionals to really pick up the E3 Aussie and other work visa hiring (if they could).
Seems like the perfect hiring profile for HR- not eligible for Majors and most LCCs so will likely upgrade and stay as Captain, while grateful to escape and be flying a regional jet that would have 3000hrs and 5 moon landing minimums back home. |
Originally Posted by havoste
(Post 3306704)
I expect the bottom tier regionals to really pick up the E3 Aussie and other work visa hiring (if they could).
Seems like the perfect hiring profile for HR- not eligible for Majors and most LCCs so will likely upgrade and stay as Captain, while grateful to escape and be flying a regional jet that would have 3000hrs and 5 moon landing minimums back home. |
Originally Posted by KirillTheThrill
(Post 3306569)
Wells Fargo just announced they’re paying new hire employees starting pay of $21 per hour. While driving I saw an Ad for school bus drivers “pay $21-30 an hour”. I’d say inflation is working it’s magic.
Also the regionals should be aware they need to do better with pay, yet even now the “desperate” shops offer peanuts straight pay and a sucker bonus. |
What does this mean for corporate pilots trying to get hired at the majors and ULCC? Will we see a higher percentage of corporate and 135 pilots in classes since hiring them doesn't jeopardize airlines' regional feeds, or are the number of them that apply too small to make a difference?
|
Originally Posted by luke3
(Post 3306785)
What does this mean for corporate pilots trying to get hired at the majors and ULCC? Will we see a higher percentage of corporate and 135 pilots in classes since hiring them doesn't jeopardize airlines' regional feeds, or are the number of them that apply too small to make a difference?
|
Originally Posted by luke3
(Post 3306785)
Will we see a higher percentage of corporate and 135 pilots in classes since hiring them doesn't jeopardize airlines' regional feeds, or are the number of them that apply too small to make a difference?
But everyone is looking for talent - I suspect 91/135 backgrounds will get more attention. And I suspect 91/135 pilots will be much more interested if interviews are plentiful and rapid seniority progression is a given. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3306817)
Most people hiring regional pilots have an incentive to jeopardize regional feeds and even DL/AA/UA have an incentive to hose their competitors.
But everyone is looking for talent - I suspect 91/135 backgrounds will get more attention. And I suspect 91/135 pilots will be much more interested if interviews are plentiful and rapid seniority progression is a given. And those unicorn 91/135 gigs are the extreme minority, anyway. Unless you’re someone who genuinely enjoys wandering the country for weeks at a time with little predictability and (let’s get real) no family, the airlines are gonna be better than the vast majority of 135 gigs. |
Had a good friend with his *dream* part 91 job. Flying a great airplane around the world for a great client. Pay was amazing.
The client's wife lost her passport in Austria, and when landing back in the states, they got delayed by Immigration because she didn't have her passport. She said that she had given it to the pilot and it must be his fault (which was not true). All of the pilots got fired and they were all replaced with more "dependable" pilots. Have heard similar stories about pilots getting fired because they had a bird strike on final causing damage to the airplane. That is the reality of being a corporate pilot. You are completely expendable. |
Airlines vs not, twin vs single, catholic vs protestant
if airline jobs get “better” there will be a flow of talent toward 121. 2022 looks to be an easy time to get hired and will probably be the front of a wave. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2021
(Post 3306845)
Had a good friend with his *dream* part 91 job. Flying a great airplane around the world for a great client. Pay was amazing.
The client's wife lost her passport in Austria, and when landing back in the states, they got delayed by Immigration because she didn't have her passport. She said that she had given it to the pilot and it must be his fault (which was not true). All of the pilots got fired and they were all replaced with more "dependable" pilots. Have heard similar stories about pilots getting fired because they had a bird strike on final causing damage to the airplane. That is the reality of being a corporate pilot. You are completely expendable. Cute story. On the contrary I know Pt91 corporate pilots who have wrecked the bosses Falcon being dumb. He punished them by buying a Global Express and giving pay raises. |
Originally Posted by Coyote76
(Post 3306794)
Not all 135 and corporate pilots want to be airline pilots. I only made the switch when the starting airline pay came up enough to justify the jump. Depending on the 135 or 91 job there are a lot of upsides to include schedules, corporate credit cards, rental cars, nice hotels, ball games, etc (there actually are really good operators out there).
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3306848)
Airlines vs not, twin vs single, catholic vs protestant
if airline jobs get “better” there will be a flow of talent toward 121. 2022 looks to be an easy time to get hired and will probably be the front of a wave. 91/135 has to be considered in the context of a career in that industry, ie your job is probably not your career. Anecdotal stories about unicorn jobs are not informative of YOUR career. A 121 job is also usually your career for almost all majors, so once you get there you can relax. Since there's nothing you can do about war, recession, pandemic, etc no point in worrying too much. Worst case, you'll get recalled in a few years. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands