Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Lobbying to roll back 1500 hr rule: (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/137593-lobbying-roll-back-1500-hr-rule.html)

SonicFlyer 05-10-2022 05:32 AM


Originally Posted by FlyGuy99 (Post 3419839)
If the regionals are having trouble retaining pilots they should increase their wages

They have, and it still isn't solving the problem. It's not about the money at the regionals, it's about the ability to actually get there.

FlyGuy99 05-10-2022 05:34 AM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3419908)
They have, and it still isn't solving the problem. It's not about the money at the regionals, it's about the ability to actually get there.

No, it’s definitely the money and fatiguing schedules. Ask anyone that’s at a regional

KirillTheThrill 05-10-2022 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3419908)
They have, and it still isn't solving the problem. It's not about the money at the regionals, it's about the ability to actually get there.

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

Jdub2 05-10-2022 07:30 AM

Hard pass.

DumboDrop 05-10-2022 07:42 AM

Didn't work out well for GLA.

hydrostream 05-10-2022 10:22 AM

Not everyone is making it to that $300,000 paycheck. The industry isn’t worth the risk for a lot of folks because unless you’re sitting on the throne it’s a never ending grind.

planejoe 05-10-2022 11:04 AM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3419908)
They have, and it still isn't solving the problem. It's not about the money at the regionals, it's about the ability to actually get there.


It's 100% about the money and QOL. There are plenty of pilots who don't pursue regionals or flying professionally because they can't afford a net $1,300 pay check and 11 days at home or less with commuting. Especially after the investment getting there.

SonicFlyer 05-10-2022 11:13 AM


Originally Posted by planejoe (Post 3420040)
It's 100% about the money and QOL. There are plenty of pilots who don't pursue regionals or flying professionally because they can't afford a net $1,300 pay check and 11 days at home or less with commuting. Especially after the investment getting there.

Please tell me which regionals where FOs are currently only bringing home $31,200 a year?

Now trying to get to 1500 hour, yes, indeed, that is very likely. But not at the regionals anymore.

PUNK 05-10-2022 11:44 AM

Roll back the 1500 rule and see the salaries drop like a rock

golfandflows 05-10-2022 11:59 AM

I’ll take “things that are definitely not gonna happen” for $2000, Alex

Slow2Final 05-10-2022 12:07 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3420047)
Please tell me which regionals where FOs are currently only bringing home $31,200 a year?

If you’re interested in a technically correct answer, the Mesa page lists $36/hr first year, with a monthly guarantee of 76. A single paycheck of that is less than $1400 gross. I imagine there are a couple others that would look around $1300 to $1500 after deductions.

Pay rates like that are just straight robbing a pilot.

planejoe 05-10-2022 12:47 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3420047)
Please tell me which regionals where FOs are currently only bringing home $31,200 a year?

Now trying to get to 1500 hour, yes, indeed, that is very likely. But not at the regionals anymore.



I said net per check. So after insurance for a family of 4 (easily couple hundred $ per check), taxes, social security etc. Unless you're single or have a significant other earning an income it's difficult to make it on regional FO pay with a family. If you can live on that more power to you but even though pay has gone up it doesn't equate to the job that is performed. Add inflation and current rent prices to the mix too.

bonvoyage 05-10-2022 02:13 PM

“In addition, this programme will support aspiring aviators from underserved communities and diverse backgrounds to pursue careers in aviation.”

Nice, they have to throw some virtue signaling in there to increase their chances!

“Collecting those hours is expensive and time consuming, creating a bottleneck in availability of new pilots that is not easily solved, say critics.”

Who in the hell pays to buy hours after you have a commercial? Other than maybe paying for a multi, you CFI or find another job.

kevin18 05-10-2022 05:20 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3420047)
Please tell me which regionals where FOs are currently only bringing home $31,200 a year?

Now trying to get to 1500 hour, yes, indeed, that is very likely. But not at the regionals anymore.

My W-2 was ~36k at mesa last year. Close enough. Won’t be here past this year I can guarantee that.

rickair7777 05-10-2022 06:01 PM


Originally Posted by bonvoyage (Post 3420124)
“Collecting those hours is expensive and time consuming, creating a bottleneck in availability of new pilots that is not easily solved, say critics.”

So is a medical residency.

bonvoyage 05-10-2022 06:39 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3420047)
Please tell me which regionals where FOs are currently only bringing home $31,200 a year?

Now trying to get to 1500 hour, yes, indeed, that is very likely. But not at the regionals anymore.

You sir, are about as out of touch with reality as airline management teams are! Good on you!

CBreezy 05-10-2022 07:20 PM


Originally Posted by Jhsouders (Post 3418013)
I am coming out the military next year as a Aircraft Commander in the V-22 (24 passenger capacity) and I will only have restricted ATP mins. I am having a hell of a time finding a job besides the regionals. I would say your ability to conduct safe flight operations highly depends on the quality of flight time that a pilot has.

You have zero experience in 121 operations which is a different world than military.

And you just aren't competitive for a major airline with that little time. Go to a regional with a good bonus structure. Pay your dues. Get your full ATP and you'll be at United in a year.

Round Luggage 05-10-2022 07:31 PM

If UND does a “deep dive” RPA does a “DEEP DEEP DIVE” and so deserves this!

jaxsurf 05-11-2022 06:39 AM


Originally Posted by bonvoyage (Post 3420267)
You sir, are about as out of touch with reality as airline management teams are! Good on you!

It really is impressive how out of touch he is.

SonicFlyer 05-11-2022 09:01 AM

As always, Mesa is the exception, not the rule.

salukipilot 05-11-2022 09:36 AM

I fly for a Part 135 ERJ-145 operator and was hired at 775. I do just fine. We even hire at 500. 1,500 hours in a single engine Cessna won’t prepare you for a transport category aircraft any more than 500 will.

bonvoyage 05-11-2022 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by jaxsurf (Post 3420494)
It really is impressive how out of touch he is.

I need whatever hobbies he has! I would love to be that far away from airline reality

planejoe 05-11-2022 10:17 AM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3420586)
As always, Mesa is the exception, not the rule.


Is it? Skywest is around 46$ an hour x 75 / 2 = 1725 gross. Take out the deductions and tell me how far off my number was.

kettlechips 05-11-2022 01:17 PM


Originally Posted by planejoe (Post 3420624)
Is it? Skywest is around 46$ an hour x 75 / 2 = 1725 gross. Take out the deductions and tell me how far off my number was.

Sonic Flyer has always struggled with math

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

aeroengineer 05-11-2022 05:12 PM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3419908)
They have, and it still isn't solving the problem. It's not about the money at the regionals, it's about the ability to actually get there.

I was talking to someone at a local university flight school and they have a full roster with something like 150 on the waiting list. I've also looked at BIZJETJOBS and just for instance they're showing a bunch of single engine turboprop jobs (like the PC-12) wanting 2000 PIC which if that's indicative of the industry as a whole some could be in for a rude awakening.

FlyGuy99 05-11-2022 06:58 PM


Originally Posted by aeroengineer (Post 3420827)
I was talking to someone at a local university flight school and they have a full roster with something like 150 on the waiting list. I've also looked at BIZJETJOBS and just for instance they're showing a bunch of single engine turboprop jobs (like the PC-12) wanting 2000 PIC which if that's indicative of the industry as a whole some could be in for a rude awakening.

Yeah I’ve checked out those job boards before and from my experience they just put that number there and then hire lower or most even just end up hiring internally or through word of mouth. Conversely, we were discussing the 121 environment and quite frankly 1500 isn’t that hard to get to. Sure, you may not be hired to time build in a jet or turboprop unless you know someone or are in the military, but most build their hours until 500 TT instructing since that’s the minimum most insurance companies require elsewhere.

I’d say in today’s environment, lots of Part 91 and 135 operators will be hiring at lower time minimums due to the decrease in the pool of available pilots who are heading for the regionals if not there already. The amount of call backs I received from places I applied to early last year and summer prior to the regionals was shocking

AirBear 05-11-2022 10:19 PM

So I wonder if that Republic program is going to give the students a year of training like I got in US Air Force UPT? I remember we had about a month of academics then were flying jets for the next 11 months (1981-1982). And prior to UPT you got some time in a military Cessna 172 or similar (depending on how you got your commission) unless you already had a PPL.
They're asking for the same reduction to 750 hours so they should get training just as good as we had.

jaxsurf 05-12-2022 03:42 AM

The fact that Republic (or any airline) could think that their training is equivalent or even somewhat close to US military flight training is utterly, incredibly laughable.

SonicFlyer 05-12-2022 05:02 AM


Originally Posted by planejoe (Post 3420624)
Is it? Skywest is around 46$ an hour x 75 / 2 = 1725 gross. Take out the deductions and tell me how far off my number was.

Practically no one is making only that there... Also it goes from $47/hr to $52/hr after the first year. In addition there are bonuses and profit sharing...

From APC:
"Pilot Profit Share Payout Program for all pilots, paid bi-annually. Additional Operational Performance Bonuses for pilots after 1 year at SkyWest and Financial Performance Bonuses for pilots after 2 years at SkyWest, paid quarterly."

herewego 05-12-2022 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3421049)

From APC:
"Pilot Profit Share Payout Program for all pilots, paid bi-annually. Additional Operational Performance Bonuses for pilots after 1 year at SkyWest and Financial Performance Bonuses for pilots after 2 years at SkyWest, paid quarterly."

Except Operational Performance Bonuses have been in the $50-$75 range per quarter lately while the Financial Performance Bonuses are effectively over since Skywest is no longer making a profit and is not forecast to do so for the near future.
Pilot Profit Share payout is only guaranteed through this year, and was on the negotiating block to be terminated the last package for FO's. Only left in place after overwhelming rejection of the first attempt by management to cut real pay, while appearing to increase pay.

Crjdeuce 05-12-2022 10:25 AM


Originally Posted by herewego (Post 3421233)
Except Operational Performance Bonuses have been in the $50-$75 range per quarter lately while the Financial Performance Bonuses are effectively over since Skywest is no longer making a profit and is not forecast to do so for the near future.
Pilot Profit Share payout is only guaranteed through this year, and was on the negotiating block to be terminated the last package for FO's. Only left in place after overwhelming rejection of the first attempt by management to cut real pay, while appearing to increase pay.

Not sure if you listened to the last earnings call but skywest was profitable first quarter of 2022. They have the money to pay us, this next pay raise better be substantial.

rjbusdriver 05-12-2022 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by SonicFlyer (Post 3421049)
Practically no one is making only that there... Also it goes from $47/hr to $52/hr after the first year. In addition there are bonuses and profit sharing...

From APC:
"Pilot Profit Share Payout Program for all pilots, paid bi-annually. Additional Operational Performance Bonuses for pilots after 1 year at SkyWest and Financial Performance Bonuses for pilots after 2 years at SkyWest, paid quarterly."

Correction, if you’re waiting for IOE you are most certainly stuck on that minimum monthly guarantee. Don’t ask me how I know..

terks43 05-12-2022 11:55 AM


Originally Posted by DontLookDown (Post 3419422)
ALL part 141 approved universities are going to put out graduates who can fly to ACS standards AND be well versed in ground knowledge and theory.

SOME part 61 students will also have comparative ground knowledge.

Other part 61 students will simply memorize Sheppard air and pass their written with a 90% or higher. Then they will memorize the ASA oral exam guidebook at best. Alternatively, they will memorize a 1 page printout of checkride gouge detailing exactly what questions to expect on the oral. They might pass their checkride with flying colors despite having a very thin layer of knowledge


Both part 141 and 61 can pass the same checkride and still not be equal.

Taught both part 61 and part 141. Part 61 churns out better pilots. Tailored training for each students needs versus a canned approach that is never truly perfect for anyone.

at6d 05-12-2022 12:40 PM

Don’t forget that for many Part 91 corporate operations, experience requirements may be based on insurance requirements.

DontLookDown 05-12-2022 04:04 PM


Originally Posted by terks43 (Post 3421327)
Taught both part 61 and part 141. Part 61 churns out better pilots. Tailored training for each students needs versus a canned approach that is never truly perfect for anyone.

I disagree. I also have experience with both.

Part 141 is also tailored to the individual. Yes, you need to make sure you do every part of the lesson and do the lessons in order. Once that is taken care of however, you keep repeating the necessary items until the student gets it.

highfarfast 05-12-2022 06:10 PM


Originally Posted by terks43 (Post 3421327)
Taught both part 61 and part 141. Part 61 churns out better pilots. Tailored training for each students needs versus a canned approach that is never truly perfect for anyone.

Man, I'll jump in here. Taught both. Flown with guys from both. This is a bit of over generalization because there's a lot of other things going on too besides where you learned to fly by the time you show up at a regional. I think Part 61 turns out better stick and rudder guys that can also think through and reason through stuff on their own. But 141 turns out pilots better suited for the procedural approach of sitting right seat in a regional airline and learning how to think through and reason through problems in the way their airline wants them to. Both are fine in the long run but from the left seat, I find it much easier to PF with a part 141 types and easier to PM with a part 61 types. The more time they have with the airline, the more time their prior experience doesn't matter.

FlyGuy99 05-12-2022 06:12 PM


Originally Posted by rjbusdriver (Post 3421307)
Correction, if you’re waiting for IOE you are most certainly stuck on that minimum monthly guarantee. Don’t ask me how I know..

I gave up on sitting around and waiting for nothing to happen. Got a second job to supplement that income

AirBear 05-12-2022 08:44 PM

Flight 3407 Families are already pushing back on Republic's request:

https://youtu.be/AhS68t3Rk4A

Andy 05-13-2022 02:49 AM


Originally Posted by AirBear (Post 3421581)
Flight 3407 Families are already pushing back on Republic's request:

https://youtu.be/AhS68t3Rk4A

Then here comes age 67 or 68.

DontLookDown 05-13-2022 03:31 AM


Originally Posted by Andy (Post 3421623)
Then here comes age 67 or 68.

Factor in all the early COVID retirements, all the people who run into medical issues in their 60s and all the others who don’t want to work past 65…. And you aren’t left with too many people.

Also, it wouldn’t fix the problem. Most pilots that old are at Majors or Legacy airlines.

The shortage is regional captains and LCA.

The only thing that would possibly put a dent in the problem is if you created a “Restricted 1st Class” medical allowing people older then 65 to still fly part 121 in aircraft with less than 80 seats (or something like that).


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands