![]() |
Regional FO Applicant glut
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...ply-is-stable/
Several regional airlines have noticed a shift in the environment with decreased attrition rates. Mesa Airlines CEO Jonathan Ornstein said, “There was a time when none of us could find first officers. Now I mean, I think we have close to 2,000 applicants for qualified first officers.” CommuteAir CEO Rick Hoefling echoed that statement. “We can hire first officers. I think almost every regional airline right now has a stack of first officers. The problem is building their time at the same time you’re attriting out captains at a pretty high rate in the industry. We went from a pilot shortage to a captain shortage now in the industry. So the pendulum is starting to move.” |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3787319)
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...ply-is-stable/
Several regional airlines have noticed a shift in the environment with decreased attrition rates. Mesa Airlines CEO Jonathan Ornstein said, “There was a time when none of us could find first officers. Now I mean, I think we have close to 2,000 applicants for qualified first officers.” CommuteAir CEO Rick Hoefling echoed that statement. “We can hire first officers. I think almost every regional airline right now has a stack of first officers. The problem is building their time at the same time you’re attriting out captains at a pretty high rate in the industry. We went from a pilot shortage to a captain shortage now in the industry. So the pendulum is starting to move.” |
Well this explains a lot.
|
Originally Posted by Plabelover
(Post 3787425)
assuming that means for someone working on their commercial right now that they will be screwed?
|
Originally Posted by Plabelover
(Post 3787425)
assuming that means for someone working on their commercial right now that they will be screwed?
You're looking at it through the wrong lens. The slow times are when you should be investing (training, earning certificates/ratings, etc.) in preparation for when hiring picks back up. If you are still working on earning your CPL, you have a long way to go before you can be hired. By then things might be back on the upswing. |
Originally Posted by QRH Bingo
(Post 3787444)
Screwed? No.
You're looking at it through the wrong lens. The slow times are when you should be investing (training, earning certificates/ratings, etc.) in preparation for when hiring picks back up. If you are still working on earning your CPL, you have a long way to go before you can be hired. By then things might be back on the upswing. |
That 2,000 number is only going to grow. Mesa isn't one of the better regionals. Envoy, Skywest and a few others probably have more applications.
The slow regional FO hiring is nowhere near the flow of people reaching 1,500. |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3787319)
https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...ply-is-stable/
Several regional airlines have noticed a shift in the environment with decreased attrition rates. Mesa Airlines CEO Jonathan Ornstein said, “There was a time when none of us could find first officers. Now I mean, I think we have close to 2,000 applicants for qualified first officers.” CommuteAir CEO Rick Hoefling echoed that statement. “We can hire first officers. I think almost every regional airline right now has a stack of first officers. The problem is building their time at the same time you’re attriting out captains at a pretty high rate in the industry. We went from a pilot shortage to a captain shortage now in the industry. So the pendulum is starting to move.” If they can hire all the First Officers they want, why are they paying $100/hour and bonuses, instead of picking the new hires willing to fly for $36/hour again? Regional CEOs earn their salaries by finding the pilots willing to fly for less than mainline, like scam artists and resellers. |
Originally Posted by TwoDaysBehind
(Post 3787600)
If they can hire all the First Officers they want, why are they paying $100/hour and bonuses, instead of picking the new hires willing to fly for $36/hour again?
Some that have only experienced the milk and honey of the last couple years may have a skewed view of the industry. Barring 67, retirements don't change, however, so I don't think things will regress horribly - maybe more of a plateau. They just won't sky rocket like recently, which was an aberration IMO. |
Originally Posted by MajorDickasons
(Post 3787489)
That 2,000 number is only going to grow. Mesa isn't one of the better regionals. Envoy, Skywest and a few others probably have more applications.
The slow regional FO hiring is nowhere near the flow of people reaching 1,500. |
The unions won't let them lower pay, right?
|
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3787633)
And when Boeing finally gets it act together and starts delivering quality planes, the freight train of hiring will ramp up. All this does is defer the issue with the regionals.
This pause will let them regenerate. I suspect regional LCA and captain will remain a decent job. There are still too many retirements in the coming decade to keep the regionals staffed otherwise. But Regional FO pay will stagnate or decrease and the union will go along with it ... why? Because some other regional will get the flying if they don't. |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3787742)
I disagree. Doubling or Tripling anticipated retirements over a year then trying to play catch up started a feedback loop that stripped the regionals of LCA's and captains faster than they could be replaced.
This pause will let them regenerate. I suspect regional LCA and captain will remain a decent job. There are still too many retirements in the coming decade to keep the regionals staffed otherwise. But Regional FO pay will stagnate or decrease and the union will go along with it ... why? Because some other regional will get the flying if they don't. |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3787742)
I disagree. Doubling or Tripling anticipated retirements over a year then trying to play catch up started a feedback loop that stripped the regionals of LCA's and captains faster than they could be replaced.
This pause will let them regenerate. I suspect regional LCA and captain will remain a decent job. There are still too many retirements in the coming decade to keep the regionals staffed otherwise. But Regional FO pay will stagnate or decrease and the union will go along with it ... why? Because some other regional will get the flying if they don't. |
Originally Posted by MajorDickasons
(Post 3787938)
Meanwhile the 1500-2000 hour pilot glut is swelling even larger each month.
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3787672)
The unions won't let them lower pay, right?
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3787672)
The unions won't let them lower pay, right?
|
Originally Posted by bluespoon
(Post 3788339)
No. only way pay goes down is if a company reorganizes under bankruptcy or they start another whipsaw airline..
They get offered new airframes contingent on a new deal- the union will say yes. The changes would mostly fall on new hires and/or FO's - therefore wouldn't affect voters much - and could be offset by some sort of signing bonus. Another tactic - probably workable as an LOA - is union approval of a training bond or something similar. Then there's always Skywest. |
Originally Posted by VacancyBid
(Post 3787742)
I disagree. Doubling or Tripling anticipated retirements over a year then trying to play catch up started a feedback loop that stripped the regionals of LCA's and captains faster than they could be replaced.
This pause will let them regenerate. I suspect regional LCA and captain will remain a decent job. There are still too many retirements in the coming decade to keep the regionals staffed otherwise. ur But Regional FO pay will stagnate or decrease and the union will go along with it ... why? Because some other regional will get the flying if they don't. |
Originally Posted by followingdreams
(Post 3788728)
this. If you are older, consider 135 as maybe your career because you may be stuck at a regional for so long you may never make it to a mojor or be at such low seniority your QOL is bad until you reach 65.
|
Originally Posted by WhyIFly
(Post 3787438)
They will certainly be starting at the backside of the wave. Another wave will certainly come along in a few years, and they should be in a good place for that one.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands