![]() |
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 240909)
Well using CHQ and CRJ-200's was not a good investment either, but Larry didnt seem to care. Also no offense but your a pilot, not our CEO, so what you think is a good investment is irrelevant :)
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 240961)
Have any idea what our company rents those 50 seaters for vs xjt's 100k per aircraft per month?
Thats kind of the point, "YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR" For some reason at some of the stations you guys fly to, we are taking your bags, and your pax's, The CRJ-200, the 50 seat, 35 pax Jet ;) |
Originally Posted by coldpilot
(Post 240931)
Not to mention CHQ has a small operation in IAH compared to XJET. Apples to oranges king10pin02.
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 240967)
Thats kind of the point, "YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR"
For some reason at some of the stations you guys fly to, we are taking your bags, and your pax's, The CRJ-200, the 50 seat, 35 pax Jet ;) |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 240972)
It's not the jet so much as the routes. I fly IAH to CMH and seem to be restricted on the ERJs more than the CRJs.
|
X-jet and CHQ both rock. Can't we all just get along?
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 240938)
Its a pride thing I guess, I dunno Im not trying to be a Douchebag, just making a comment that would appear funnier to you if we were drinking a beer at a bar as opposed to reading it on the net :)
BTW, pride would be having confidence in what you do, not criticizing what others do. |
you know i would hate to break it to you guys but most of the xjt guys could care less about chq. yeah we know about it but theres no animosity. There are a lot of chq guys with something to prove though and are looking for reasons to not like xjt. some people have posted that some of us have flipped off chq aircraft and i personally think it was a BS exaggeration. If it did happen, then you laugh it off and be the bigger person. Not go crying to your online posting buddies who will agree 100% "yeah they suck." I think a lot of people on here are getting the wrong picture of our airlines by a few very vocal, immature individuals who have kind of lost touch with the reality of job. your a pilot fly the damn airplane and go home enjoy your life.
about the no-acars thing. taxiing in with a chq flight BEHIND us on the ramp and they were calling ops with "wheels on and in times" while we were still taxiing. we never said anything about it to anyone because its bull**** to turn in another pilot but i think its crap to say "look at our stats" when everyone knows its kind of rigged. no need for a ****ing match... both of our companies have problems and this pilot group vs another is crap |
I don't think anyone from CHQ has ever said XJT sucks. At least I haven't read it. I also haven't read about anyone from XJT flippin' us the bird...you might be thinking of a Comair thread from awhile ago. The XJT crews I ran into in IAH were pretty awesome. I'm just defending my company like the XJTers. When they do it, it's called pride or something like that.
And about the ACARS...like no one has ever been able to get around THAT thing. And the 170's have them and those numbers are the same as CHQ's... |
I'll always be out 5 early. You guys want a silent protest for higher pay well there's mine. Everyone knows you can cheat with ACARS just as easily.
|
From my experience flying both aircraft - I'd have to say the ERJ (LR's) were always the more likely of the two to be weight-restricted...haven't kicked a pax off the -200 yet, as opposed to the many that found themselves walking when I had been in the 145. Now I know the XR's are stronger birds, but I'd be hard-pressed to believe they don't sometimes have issues as well...
BTW, the -200 takes a bird on the beak very well...as I found out last night going into ORD!! Poor guy - nothing now but a has-been splatter ;-P |
I've been at XJT since the 1st XR was delivered, longer actually but that's besides the point. Believe it or not, I had never been or heard of any weight restrictions on the XR. That was until a few months ago. But it took 50 pax, loaded bags w/heavies, a long flight to YYT at Cat 2 mins with 2 alternates, one of which was halfway back to EWR.
|
Originally Posted by Bloodhound
(Post 241168)
I've been at XJT since the 1st XR was delivered, longer actually but that's besides the point. Believe it or not, I had never been or heard of any weight restrictions on the XR. That was until a few months ago. But it took 50 pax, loaded bags w/heavies, a long flight to YYT at Cat 2 mins with 2 alternates, one of which was halfway back to EWR.
|
It's always sad when these CHQ/XJT threads start to die out....see y'all next month!!!!
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 241139)
I'll always be out 5 early. You guys want a silent protest for higher pay well there's mine. Everyone knows you can cheat with ACARS just as easily.
|
I can't believe you guys do EWR-IAH in a 145.
I'd shoot myself! |
cheat with acars? yeah you could pop the circuit breaker and risk a carpet dance in the cpo because they can tell when you do that. other then that.... your still on and in when your ON and IN. i wish we could fudge it but no dice
|
We don't fly IAH-EWR. CAL scope prohibits anyone but CAL from doing inter-hub flights. We do, however, fly IAH-xxx-EWR or CLE.
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 240961)
Have any idea what our company rents those 50 seaters for vs xjt's 100k per aircraft per month?
Any idea who holds the lease to the aircraft your company is sub-leasing? How about some investigating....;) |
Seriously, everybody just go live your life. Cause this is going to keep you from enjoying it.
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 241217)
No, you can't.
|
Originally Posted by newarkblows
(Post 241307)
cheat with acars? yeah you could pop the circuit breaker and risk a carpet dance in the cpo because they can tell when you do that. other then that.... your still on and in when your ON and IN. i wish we could fudge it but no dice
|
yeah toilet... lemme guess with your infinite experience with acars you somehow found a way to cheat the system. these past 6 months with republic must have really taught you all about acars. give me a break. i liked you better when you werent trying to be the next saaborowski. if it was so easy to cheat we would... besides popping the breaker there is very little you can do to change your times.
|
... not to mention all the cameras that are monitored and cross-check out-times and pushback.
|
Originally Posted by Bloodhound
(Post 242058)
... not to mention all the cameras that are monitored and cross-check out-times and pushback.
|
TSA would routinely change the OOOI times...
You'd close the doors 10 minutes late, ACARS would record it, and *magically* company shows you out ON TIME if you were bored enough to check later that night... |
Originally Posted by newarkblows
(Post 242032)
yeah toilet... lemme guess with your infinite experience with acars you somehow found a way to cheat the system.
|
Originally Posted by newarkblows
(Post 242032)
give me a break. i liked you better when you werent trying to be the next saaborowski.
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 242098)
I am not sure how to take this.............:cool:
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 242098)
I am not sure how to take this.............:cool:
|
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 241794)
You so sure about that?
If you can spoof your ACARS by means other than the CBP (and I'm not talking "get the doors shut so we can get an out time!") then more power to you... |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 242094)
Out side of IAH I've never heard of any other place this happens.
Let me add the EWR Ops perfected it before anyone. |
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
(Post 242101)
Compliment SAAB... Compliment.. BTW how many hours you at and are you submitting anywhere else?
2630TT 1450 Multi 1300 Turbine 1100 PIC, non-turbine of course :) |
Originally Posted by jdt30
(Post 238399)
Scope may be one of the only things Cal pilots agree on. Anything larger than fifty seats with jet engines is going to be flown by a Cal pilot.
|
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 238950)
Just what benefits do you think are all that much better at mainlines other than the pay? In general their work rules are better but im not sure anything else is all that much "better".... or is it just that you think its a "stigma" to be considered a regional pilot?
|
Originally Posted by SharkyBN584
(Post 240934)
That's a pretty ignorant statement there champ. Our on time and completion factor is right up there with XJet's. The only people I keep hearing complaining about CHQ at CAL is XJET pilots. Even the Ops and ground agents have started backing off.
I guess they're just being nice because they won't stop chewing my ear about how frustrated they are with the weight restrictions. I know thats not your (the pilots) fault, but I still hear a lot of complaining. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:26 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands