![]() |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 312670)
Factually correct story, but lacking in scope and perspective. Did you notice how they stated that none of the last 5 accidents were attributed to experience.....while showing footage of charred wreckage. |
"If i'm not mistaken, on a side note, when airlines were looking for pilots in the 60's and 70's, most of those guys were just found off the street and put in through training"
Yes, you're mistaken. I was there in the 70's and it wasn't like that. Maybe in the early 60's, but still, they went to the F/E seat and didn't train in sims. They trained in the real thing, to proficieny, thus proving they were somewhat competent to do the job. |
Originally Posted by ovrtake92
(Post 312653)
Seriously...Passing an SIC ride in a barbie jet doesnt mean you have experience. It just means you get to throw on the backpack and follow your captain around.
one more thing......abc can get this piece and sit on it.... just trying to scare the general public as usual.... i think that in the US we have very good experienced pilots that are safe and competent... all you have to do to understand this is to visit any flight school doing international training for countries like mexico and china.... 100's of 21-25 yr olds who get their commercial instrument and multi in the usa and go straight back to their county of orgin to fly 737's....now thats scary!!! |
Originally Posted by Sbaker1595
(Post 312802)
i think that in the US we have very good experienced pilots that are safe and competent... all you have to do to understand this is to visit any flight school doing international training for countries like mexico and china.... 100's of 21-25 yr olds who get their commercial instrument and multi in the usa and go straight back to their county of orgin to fly 737's....now thats scary!!!
|
I like how they showed clips of SWA jets while talking about 'inexperience.' :D
|
Have you ever seen a news-personality that was not in desperate need of a reality-check? They're jokers feeding on Americans fears...and a classic case of the blind leading the blind!
|
I'm really really glad they went easy on us as far as flight time required to fly for the airlines, 1500 for majors vs 500 for regionals. In reality it looks much worse than that, probably more like 5000 vs 500. I liked how they also mentioned that experience has nothing to do with the past crashes, then what was the point of the story, to scare the public??
|
Originally Posted by AirWillie
(Post 312863)
I'm really really glad they went easy on us as far as flight time required to fly for the airlines, 1500 for majors vs 500 for regionals. In reality it looks much worse than that, probably more like 5000 vs 500. I liked how they also mentioned that experience has nothing to do with the past crashes, then what was the point of the story, to scare the public??
|
In fact, most major airlines require regional pilots to have just one-third of the experience they demand from national pilots.
Uh.....so the "national pilots" require 1000 hours????? |
Military pilots have relatively few flight hours and they fly nukes around.
Granted, some regionals have better training than others, but in the end its about quality more than quantity of experience. And basically I think alot comes down to each person individually- maybe thats a product of culture at each airline to promote excellence. In any case, there's a captain there to make the tough decisions, the FO only really needs to be able to fly the plane and thats what the training teaches. Eventually with enough exposure the low-time FOs will learn how to think like a captain. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands