Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
2004 Corporate Airlines Flt. 5956 Crash NTSB Findings >

2004 Corporate Airlines Flt. 5956 Crash NTSB Findings

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

2004 Corporate Airlines Flt. 5956 Crash NTSB Findings

Old 01-24-2006, 05:17 PM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
CitationJason's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: CRJ-700 FO
Posts: 83
Default 2004 Corporate Airlines Flt. 5956 Crash NTSB Findings

Hey Folks:

Interesting article on the Corporate Airlines Crash in Missouri in 2004.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...tigation_x.htm

I have some mixed and weird emotions regarding the article. I'd like you guys' take on the whole deal.

CJ
CitationJason is offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 06:04 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Any seat that pays
Posts: 219
Default

Exuastion + Get-there Itis = Bad News
loudgarrettdriver is offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 06:29 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotpip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 2,934
Default

Add crappy wx as we had that day into the equation. Unfortunately this was one of those times where the fallibility of humans added up into a bad situation.

Being in St. Louis this one was a big story today. The media butchered it up quite a bit. They more or less said the aircraft "didn't have adequate warning systems to alert to low altitude". I'm assuming this means the jetstream didn't have EGPWS, which wasn't required at the time. They also had a free for all with the non-precision approach and how there are other systems available. IRK doesn't have anything other than non-precisions, at least they didn't the last time I was there.

I found an interview with the two surviors of this flight interesting. Both were injured pretty severly, one requiring about 9 surgeries since the accident. Both, however, agreed that they felt no bad feelings towards the crew because it was a mistake and nothing more.

The link at the bottom has a couple quotes from Woerth. The crew was in their 14th hour of duty time that day.
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/new...1?OpenDocument
Pilotpip is offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 07:06 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tech Maven's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: A320 F/O
Posts: 510
Default

Thanks for posting, makes for some chilling but interesting reading.
Tech Maven is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 06:28 AM
  #5  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
CitationJason's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: CRJ-700 FO
Posts: 83
Default

Thanks Folks.

I agree, it just seemed to be a whole lotta' small problems that compiled into a nasty situation. I fly for a 24/ 7 operation, and on some nights, we are hitting the 10th, 11th, 12th hour of duty time, and at night in IFR, you gotta' pull yourself together to a whole new level. I am not excusing the mistakes, I just wish people would understand the very demanding lifestyles of these pilots. This is why airline pay is currently unacceptable. (I better be careful, that sermon is for a different thread!) I just really was uneasy with how the article was written. Although their behavior was unprofessional, cussing didn't bring down that airplane. It's just one of those nasty situations.

Fly Safely!
CJ
CitationJason is offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 08:46 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Default

I knew Capt Kim Sasse personally. In fact he was my instructor when I obtained my PPL. He was always very professional, detail oriented and one heck of a nice guy. Such a shame to see him go out the way he did. I had lost touch with him over the years and didn't know until last night he was piloting that aircraft when it crashed. Very sad indeed.
Joeshmoe is offline  
Old 01-26-2006, 09:44 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Default

Not to mention 6 legs, no autopilot, crappy weather. They had a duty in time of about 05:30, which meant they were probably up at 04:00, maybe earlier. Not sure what time they went to bed the night before, or if they were on duty the day before, but that would have been a factor too.
Been there, would have done that, but for the grace of God, some luck, and having good pilots sitting next to me.
Blackhawk is offline  
Old 01-26-2006, 04:18 PM
  #8  
AAmerican Way for AA Pay
 
B757200ER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: B-737 Pilot
Posts: 1,617
Default

Originally Posted by Joeshmoe
I knew Capt Kim Sasse personally. In fact he was my instructor when I obtained my PPL. He was always very professional, detail oriented and one heck of a nice guy. Such a shame to see him go out the way he did.

Sorry for your loss, Joe. It would be better for all of us if Kim were here to tell us his story of what happened.
B757200ER is offline  
Old 02-23-2006, 02:22 PM
  #9  
WWflyboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Red face

That is really sad to hear this story. I'm at a flight school starting a new career because I fell asleep at the wheel of a big rig due to fatigue. I was hoping that the FAA was a little more strict on the hrs. of service than the DOT was. Guess not.
 
Old 02-23-2006, 09:05 PM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,186
Default

They didn't need to be particularly strict...the union contracts historically provided adequate rest at most carriers. That is all changing now that everybody's doing Ch.11 and throwing out their contracts.

ALPA's number one priority in life right now appears to be legislative improvements to airline rest requirements.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
12-08-2005 06:50 AM
Flea Bite
Major
0
07-24-2005 09:26 AM
Sir James
Major
1
07-17-2005 08:47 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices