![]() |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 353595)
Air Wisconsin's owners have something like 2M+ shares of LCC as well as a seat on the LCC BoD. Or, they did not too long ago...
Nobody is SAFE but my guess is AWAC is safer than Chautauqua (NOT REPUBLIC) & TSA, and maybe even Mesa and PSA. |
The RW side seems to be fairly safe - if anything, mainline is using the 170s to fill up the holes in their patchwork schedules. Seeing as RAH owns as much stock in US Air as they do, I would assume RAH/CHQ are relatively safe. I'd be only slightly more worried about PSA, but Comair has shown us all that being wholly owned by mainline != get out of jail free card. Piedmont is filling their niche too well to run into any real problems. Anyone else is fair game.
|
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 354077)
AWAC would go before PSA ever does. We are wholly owned and operate cheaper than AWAC. The only reason AWAC has a piece of the pie is because they helped bail out Airways during BK.
|
Originally Posted by thepotato232
(Post 354080)
The RW side seems to be fairly safe - if anything, mainline is using the 170s to fill up the holes in their patchwork schedules. Seeing as RAH owns as much stock in US Air as they do, I would assume RAH/CHQ are relatively safe. I'd be only slightly more worried about PSA, but Comair has shown us all that being wholly owned by mainline != get out of jail free card. Piedmont is filling their niche too well to run into any real problems. Anyone else is fair game.
|
When it comes to RAH I don't feel threatened. Still growing and busting at the seems on the CHQ side of things. I was called today for overtime as a matter of fact. Flew this past trip with a reserve CA they had to DHD in from IND because we still need more.
|
Originally Posted by texaspilot76
(Post 354077)
AWAC would go before PSA ever does. We are wholly owned and operate cheaper than AWAC. The only reason AWAC has a piece of the pie is because they helped bail out Airways during BK.
Just ask Comair how being wholly owned and operating cheaper than their non-WO competition is working out for them... |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 353621)
Mesa's contract is up in 2012. DP has stated publicly that he would like to get rid of them asap. The only thing that might save mesa is those 38 900's they own.
We'll see. |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 354121)
And that's the reason they're "safer" than PSA...
Just ask Comair how being wholly owned and operating cheaper than their non-WO competition is working out for them... |
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 354121)
And that's the reason they're "safer" than PSA...
Just ask Comair how being wholly owned and operating cheaper than their non-WO competition is working out for them... US Airways is a part of AWAC, not the other way 'round.... ;) That said, anything is possible. Me? I just do my job as well as I can. It's all I can do. |
I think any company operating 50 seaters could see reduction.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands