Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   PHX flying (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/24646-phx-flying.html)

DsrtAV8R 04-04-2008 08:35 AM

PHX flying
 
If Mesa goes belly-up sometime in the next year, which is becoming more and more of a possibility by the minute. . . any speculation as to who might get the PHX flying?

rickair7777 04-04-2008 08:39 AM


Originally Posted by DsrtAV8R (Post 355352)
If Mesa goes belly-up sometime in the next year, which is becoming more and more of a possibility by the minute. . . any speculation as to who might get the PHX flying?

AWA/Airways has been talking on-and-off to SKW about that for years.

But it could really go to anybody, depending on what airplanes they want there. The original 900 presence was conceived pre-merger, not sure how important that is in PHX today since they moved a bunch of them east post-merger.

BoredwLife 04-04-2008 08:45 AM

The most brilliant move would be for Horizon to move down there since they wanna stay west coast. But AAG drags thier feet more than a drunk seal so I doubt it would happen.

JetJock16 04-04-2008 09:06 AM


Originally Posted by BoredwLife (Post 355364)
The most brilliant move would be for Horizon to move down there since they wanna stay west coast. But AAG drags thier feet more than a drunk seal so I doubt it would happen.

I don't see it happening but who knows, it would be great for you guys seeing it would decrease your upgrade time and help to pack the bank with some of Parkers money.

My opinion is that SKW will get the majority of the PHX and LAS flying with RAH taking the rest. I also see AWAC and PSA picking up the slack out east.

BoredwLife 04-04-2008 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355385)
My opinion is that SKW will get the majority of the PHX and LAS flying with RAH taking the rest. I also see AWAC and PSA picking up the slack out east.

I am sure your right.

JetJock16 04-04-2008 11:02 AM


Originally Posted by BoredwLife (Post 355432)
I am sure your right.

Hey, who knows, best of luck to you guys.

I'm head back to the Bro where I will be bidding and hopefully holding the best 121 flying in the NATION! That's PDX and SEA. IMO and I've been based in FAT, DEN, SLC, TUS and ATL; PDX flying is the best, bar none!

G2TT 04-04-2008 12:24 PM

The last thing they need is Another regional feed. I would expect to see it covered by a combination of expanded WO's (maybe PDT will finally get their 400's!), AWAC, and Republic.

ExperimentalAB 04-04-2008 12:31 PM


Originally Posted by G2TT (Post 355527)
The last thing they need is Another regional feed. I would expect to see it covered by a combination of expanded WO's (maybe PDT will finally get their 400's!), AWAC, and Republic.

No way! I highly doubt that...

G2TT 04-04-2008 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB (Post 355534)
No way! I highly doubt that...

Which part? The one about PDT getting 400's or the one about USAir doing something that makes sense? I won't argue either one. :D

JetJock16 04-04-2008 12:34 PM


Originally Posted by G2TT (Post 355527)
The last thing they need is Another regional feed. I would expect to see it covered by a combination of expanded WO's (maybe PDT will finally get their 400's!), AWAC, and Republic.

Hmmmmmmm.......ya? That's makes no sense. :confused:

And I'm not talking about what make sense the airlines don't do. The argument that US doesn’t need another feeder doesn't hold that much weight when you look at many factors, one being the ability to whipsaw while limiting ones restraints.

G2TT 04-04-2008 12:37 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355540)
Hmmmmmmm.......ya? That's makes no sense. :confused:

Colgan, TSA, CHQ, Republic, PSA, PDT, AWAC, MESA...did I forget anyone? I don't think they need any more regional carriers, I think they would try and fill Mesa's hole with carriers they already have.

There is no shortage of groups to whipsaw, especially with two separate wholly owed carriers.

JetJock16 04-04-2008 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by G2TT (Post 355542)
Colgan, TSA, CHQ, Republic, PSA, PDT, AWAC, MESA...did I forget anyone? I don't think they need any more regional carriers, I think they would try and fill Mesa's hole with carriers they already have.

There is no shortage of groups to whipsaw, especially with two separate wholly owed carriers.

The number of carriers is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

groovinaviator 04-04-2008 12:42 PM

Whoever takes the lead in the race to the bottom after MAG folds would get the flying. TSA... Pinnacle... Colgan...? Who wants it guys... how cheap will you work for that "quick" upgrade?

it would be nice if something like that went to AWAC... a change from the East Coast scenery would be nice.

ExperimentalAB 04-04-2008 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by groovinaviator (Post 355550)
Whoever takes the lead in the race to the bottom after MAG folds would get the flying. TSA... Pinnacle... Colgan...? Who wants it guys... how cheap will you work for that "quick" upgrade?

it would be nice if something like that went to AWAC... a change from the East Coast scenery would be nice.

I tired of the East coast 121 flying in about 6 weeks...

BoredwLife 04-04-2008 12:51 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355466)
Hey, who knows, best of luck to you guys.

I'm head back to the Bro where I will be bidding and hopefully holding the best 121 flying in the NATION! That's PDX and SEA. IMO and I've been based in FAT, DEN, SLC, TUS and ATL; PDX flying is the best, bar none!


I love flying up here and living up here. Would only leave for a gig on a island. Or the ability to commte to an island. It does rain A LOT though.

G2TT 04-04-2008 12:57 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355549)
The number of carriers is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

Hey, I'm just voicing my opinion. It's really more of what I would want to happen than what I think will happen. If I want to dream of PDT and AWAC getting more airways flying instead of Skywest, well I don't think I'm alone. The number of carriers is not irrelevant to me, if they add another new carrier to replace Mesa, that just means the companies already working for airways didn't get the flying, and that I disagree with (which really doesn't matter, because they aren't going to ask either of us what we think about it).

JetJock16 04-04-2008 01:04 PM


Originally Posted by G2TT (Post 355562)
Hey, I'm just voicing my opinion. It's really more of what I would want to happen than what I think will happen. If I want to dream of PDT and AWAC getting more airways flying instead of Skywest, well I don't think I'm alone. The number of carriers is not irrelevant to me, if they add another new carrier to replace Mesa, that just means the companies already working for airways didn't get the flying, and that I disagree with (which really doesn't matter, because they aren't going to ask either of us what we think about it).

True, we just fly an airplane, we have no influence.

BTW, I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier.

G2TT 04-04-2008 01:12 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355566)
I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier.

Now we're talking

ExperimentalAB 04-04-2008 02:24 PM

Yes...the very best outcome of this debacle would be that JO never be free to destroy an Airline again.

rickair7777 04-04-2008 04:00 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355566)
True, we just fly an airplane, we have no influence.

BTW, I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier.

I think he is pretty much persona-non-grata in the mainstream airline industry...you won't see him at a big-name carrier. But I wouldn't rule out some start-up...he was buddies with Branson at one point.

JetJock16 04-04-2008 04:27 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 355690)
I think he is pretty much persona-non-grata in the mainstream airline industry...you won't see him at a big-name carrier. But I wouldn't rule out some start-up...he was buddies with Branson at one point.

Yes, I realize my hopes will never come to fruition but I will always pray that he does not ever get another opportunity to ruin another person’s life other than his own.

Timmay 04-04-2008 04:43 PM

That sounds like a dangerous combo there...JO managing a company financed by Branson. Hopefully Sir Richard has more sense than that!

Seatownflyer 04-04-2008 04:51 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355466)
Hey, who knows, best of luck to you guys.

I'm head back to the Bro where I will be bidding and hopefully holding the best 121 flying in the NATION! That's PDX and SEA. IMO and I've been based in FAT, DEN, SLC, TUS and ATL; PDX flying is the best, bar none!

Where are you going to be based? I think you have to have known Methuselah personally in order to get a captain spot in PDX.

JetJock16 04-04-2008 04:52 PM


Originally Posted by Timmay (Post 355725)
That sounds like a dangerous combo there...JO managing a company financed by Branson. Hopefully Sir Richard has more sense than that!

I do believe it's already happened.

http://www.mesa-air.com/history.asp
quote:
In early 1998, Mesa recruited Jonathan Ornstein to return to the company as President and CEO. Jonathan had held various positions at Mesa during 1987 to 1994. From 1994 to 1998, Mr. Ornstein was CEO of Continental Express and President and CEO of Virgin Express, a low fare airline based in Brussels.

JetJock16 04-04-2008 04:54 PM


Originally Posted by Seatownflyer (Post 355730)
Where are you going to be based? I think you have to have known Methuselah personally in order to get a captain spot in PDX.

FAT, I'd say 1/3 of their 4 day trips head up through PDX.

Foxcow 04-04-2008 06:16 PM


Originally Posted by groovinaviator (Post 355550)
it would be nice if something like that went to AWAC... a change from the East Coast scenery would be nice.


I doubt they are interested in 50 seaters.

Timmay 04-04-2008 06:28 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355732)
I do believe it's already happened.

http://www.mesa-air.com/history.asp
quote:
In early 1998, Mesa recruited Jonathan Ornstein to return to the company as President and CEO. Jonathan had held various positions at Mesa during 1987 to 1994. From 1994 to 1998, Mr. Ornstein was CEO of Continental Express and President and CEO of Virgin Express, a low fare airline based in Brussels.

Well...thanks for setting me straight!

grossole 04-04-2008 06:29 PM


Originally Posted by groovinaviator (Post 355550)
Whoever takes the lead in the race to the bottom after MAG folds would get the flying. TSA... Pinnacle... Colgan...? Who wants it guys... how cheap will you work for that "quick" upgrade?

Way to take the high road....

ExperimentalAB 04-04-2008 06:57 PM


Originally Posted by grossole (Post 355836)
Way to take the high road....

I'm sure he didn't mean too much by it man.

rickair7777 04-04-2008 07:07 PM


Originally Posted by Timmay (Post 355725)
That sounds like a dangerous combo there...JO managing a company financed by Branson. Hopefully Sir Richard has more sense than that!

Too late....

Seatownflyer 04-04-2008 07:55 PM


Originally Posted by JetJock16 (Post 355735)
FAT, I'd say 1/3 of their 4 day trips head up through PDX.

ah ok, that explains all the lost brasillias taxing in circles around the N satellite in seattle. :D

AZFlyer 04-04-2008 09:18 PM

Its pretty clear what the majority of the industry's pilot group thinks of JO. But what about airline execs from other companies? Are they as disapproving of him as most pilots are?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands