Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   What is SKYW thinking??? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/25705-what-skyw-thinking.html)

dojetdriver 04-25-2008 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by mking84 (Post 373546)
The XRJ is efficient for a few other reasons. It will carry 50 people, with all their bags, a long way. IE IAH-YYZ, IAH-ZIH, IAH-PIT, OKC-EWR, AUS-CLE. Its a good plane. You also have to remember that all of our LRJs are now LR2s, with a post-weight mod, that allows us to carry an additional 1,000lbs of weight in the reg. LRG. XJT can fill a 50 seat airplane with bags and gas b/c we have invested so much into w/b programs. So 50 seats or not, they are efficient aircraft.

Well, for the most part, yes. But I'm guessing that you have not run into a few different situations with the XR.

1) Operating out of ZCL, CUL, or Toluca. More than once coming out of ZCL guess what? Limited on the MAGTOW. In other words, COULDN'T take ALL the bags. Same thing, take a payload hit.

Granted, doesn't happen all the time, but still.

2) You are LS limited, your destinations WX requires an alt, and that alt is QUITE a distance away and requires a considerable amount of fuel.

mking84 04-25-2008 03:32 PM


Originally Posted by dojetdriver (Post 373707)
Well, for the most part, yes. But I'm guessing that you have not run into a few different situations with the XR.

1) Operating out of ZCL, CUL, or Toluca. More than once coming out of ZCL guess what? Limited on the MAGTOW. In other words, COULDN'T take ALL the bags. Same thing, take a payload hit.

Granted, doesn't happen all the time, but still.

2) You are LS limited, your destinations WX requires an alt, and that alt is QUITE a distance away and requires a considerable amount of fuel.

With anything there is an exception to the rule. For a 50 seat aircraft it does the job it was intended to...50 people and bags.

ExperimentalAB 04-25-2008 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by mking84 (Post 373891)
With anything there is an exception to the rule. For a 50 seat aircraft it does the job it was intended to...50 people and bags.

Yes! It is a true 50 seater, and it actually does what it was made to (on the backs of the EP/LR - at least Embraer learned). But its still an RJ.

mking84 04-25-2008 05:53 PM


Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB (Post 373976)
Yes! It is a true 50 seater, and it actually does what it was made to (on the backs of the EP/LR - at least Embraer learned). But its still an RJ.

Yes, last time I flew it was. Dont know if anything has changed.

mking84 04-25-2008 06:30 PM


Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED (Post 374007)
This just in...

"Unprofitable express jet branded flying coming to an end, Skywest will succeed in purchase of express jet at $3.60 a share. Delta flying will be flown by ASA. Express jet crews get stapled to the bottom of Skywest, ASA seniority list."

You must have alot of time on your hands flying the E170......Those who live in glass houses...

The Juice 04-28-2008 03:58 PM


Originally Posted by tpersuit (Post 373393)
There will always be a 50-seat market some where. You wouldn't stick a E170 on a route that only can sell 50 seats because it still costs more to operate than the 145. XJT's XR's are pretty fuel efficient 50-seaters compared to other 50-seaters out there.

http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/m...ol_aid_guy.jpg

It tastes so good.

cfii2007 04-28-2008 04:10 PM

"I personally believe that U.S. Americans are unable
to do so because, uhmmm, some people out there in our
nation don't have maps and uh, I believe that our, I,
education like such as uh, South Africa, and uh, the
Iraq, everywhere like such as, and I believe that they
should, uhhh, our education over here in the US should
help the US, uh, should help South Africa, it should
help the Iraq and the Asian countries so we will be
able to build up our future, for us."

tpersuit 04-28-2008 05:09 PM


Originally Posted by The Juice (Post 375387)

?

guess you've been drinking too much.

cfii2007 04-28-2008 05:11 PM

You might be right!!!!!!!!!!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands