Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Heres the Letter from Misner to XJT Regarding SKW (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/25716-heres-letter-misner-xjt-regarding-skw.html)

Pitts S2B 04-26-2008 12:43 PM


Originally Posted by RamenNoodles (Post 373960)
SkyWest is unable to operate on behalf of CAL because of scope clauses: no jets over 50 seats, and SkyWest has a plethora of 66, 70, and 76 seat jets.

Just do like republic and make a new certificate. Presto, you are (unfortunately) around scope...

Pitts S2B 04-26-2008 12:46 PM


Originally Posted by SAABaroowski (Post 374166)
What worries me is, why CAL is doing this now? Why not just wait until further down the road...This is why a lot of XJT guys have a personal dislike for CAL

Maybe it's because SKYW already flies for United???

A lot of CHQ guys are starting to understand that 'dislike' of the CAL operation too...

tpersuit 04-26-2008 12:48 PM


Originally Posted by Pitts S2B (Post 374447)
Just do like republic and make a new certificate. Presto, you are (unfortunately) around scope...


Last time I checked RAH only flies crj-200 and erj-145's for CAL.

blastoff 04-26-2008 01:02 PM


Originally Posted by Pitts S2B (Post 374447)
Just do like republic and make a new certificate. Presto, you are (unfortunately) around scope...

You're confused...CAL's scope limits their regional feed to 50 seats...how would a new certificate for Skywest get around CAL's scope?

freezingflyboy 04-26-2008 01:24 PM


Originally Posted by blastoff (Post 374457)
You're confused...CAL's scope limits their regional feed to 50 seats...how would a new certificate for Skywest get around CAL's scope?

The same way RAH's (aka Chapublicle) myriad of certificates helps them navigate the various scope clauses for the mainline partners they fly for.

johnso29 04-26-2008 01:26 PM


Originally Posted by freezingflyboy (Post 374477)
The same way RAH's (aka Chapublicle) myriad of certificates helps them navigate the various scope clauses for the mainline partners they fly for.


Yes, but everyone RAH flys the E170 for has scope which allows 70 seaters. CALs scope does not, therefore a different certificate would not allow them to fly 70 seaters for CAL.

freezingflyboy 04-26-2008 01:31 PM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 374479)
Yes, but everyone RAH flys the E170 for has scope which allows 70 seaters. CALs scope does not, therefore a different certificate would not allow them to fly 70 seaters for CAL.

You're correct. I realize I misinterpreted what the person who originally posted about the new certificate was saying. As it stands right now, anything with jet engines and 51+ seats on it has to be flown by CAL mainline pilots. The only way to change that would be to change CAL's scope clause.

johnso29 04-26-2008 01:33 PM


Originally Posted by freezingflyboy (Post 374481)
You're correct. I realize I misinterpreted what the person who originally posted about the new certificate was saying. As it stands right now, anything with jet engines and 51+ seats on it has to be flown by CAL mainline pilots. The only way to change that would be to change CAL's scope clause.


No worries, just wanted to clarify that.

dojetdriver 04-26-2008 02:24 PM


Originally Posted by freezingflyboy (Post 374481)
You're correct. I realize I misinterpreted what the person who originally posted about the new certificate was saying. As it stands right now, anything with jet engines and 51+ seats on it has to be flown by CAL mainline pilots. The only way to change that would be to change CAL's scope clause.

And unfortunately, it seems like that may become more and more of a reality.

I'm not slamming the CAL pilot group, and I hope (for MY sake and THEIRS) they can hold on.

But the fuel prices are effecting CAL just like everybody else. They have new planes still arriving, although efficient, they STILL carry a heftier lease payment. To top if off, the CAL pilot group is trying to "take it back" so to speak. In other words, want a new/better contract that equates to higher labor costs for CAL.

It wouldn't matter who was in their position, they are in a crappy spot and are losing leverage to be able to hold on to some of the better and more expensive parts of their contract. And one of them being scope. Scope is good for us and our careers, its sucks for management trying to control costs. As much as we pilots and our egos like to think the airline (and world) revolves around US and we run the airline, it's just not the case.

It's becoming old and cliche, but if management goes with the "hey guys, it pay raises, retirement protection, AND a revision to PBS language if you give up scope", which way do you think they will go?

JoeyMeatballs 04-26-2008 03:19 PM


Originally Posted by Airsupport (Post 374441)
yes you are right. i was thinking 4 crews per plane, but forgot that a crew is 2 people, so that would be more like 400-500 pilots.




maybe you guys arent getting my point. no one knows what the skywest cpa is. you are all right that if skywest makes the purchase the NEW cpa would over ride the current one with xjt. what i am saying is that the big savings skywest has promised may just be infact getting rid of the 51 planes. THAT may be in the new cpa. that may save cal 10's of millions of dollars. that may help cal lean out their regional.


One thing I do know, is this deal will go nowhere without the pilot groups approval, they can't go around, or through us, going to have to be with us and I can tell you personally we have a very STRONG MEC, after all yours truly is part of it ;)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands