Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Letter from MEC Jumpseat Committee, July 8, 2008 >

Letter from MEC Jumpseat Committee, July 8, 2008

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Letter from MEC Jumpseat Committee, July 8, 2008

Old 07-10-2008, 11:30 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

This is exactly the attitude that got us into this mess to begin with.... its UAL's software... its NOT any piece of software that any UAX carrier has responsibility for. It WAS correct then UAL changed it... yet somehow you decide that NOW its UAX's carriers problem? Its ALWAYS UAL software... and NEARLY always UAL mainline gate agents but somehow you have the gall to suggest that this is a UAX problem.... unbelievable.

On another note... YOU are spot on for calling out the bozo above who said he hoped UAL would fail... thats just WRONG... good luck all the crew at UAL who will be effected going forward over the next few months.


Originally Posted by TripleMix View Post
You can do what our MEC suggested two years ago, referencing the recent UAL MEC letter: "At one point in one of the meetings members of the group were asked if they would petition their managements for money to defray the costs of software upgrades. Not one member offered to ask their management for some monetary assistance."

We've known for two years that UAL management wouldn't fix the problem, so what have the collective UEX pilots done since then? Nothing. It is THEIR problem. They don't have the cajones to address it with their respective managements, so their solution is to threaten the UAL pilots. It is unbelievable that they are somehow offended when the UAL pilots respond in kind. Take some freaking responsibility.

Granted, we codeshare, but we are SEPARATE companies. Apollo is an antiquated relic that is difficult to modify, but are the UEX companies creating their own software? No. Until they can convince their management companies to fix THEIR problem, the problem will not go away.

Solution: take back some Captain authority.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 04:27 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
weasil's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Captain
Posts: 178
Default

There was a conference call yesterday on the issue.

They are resorting to using paper jumpseat forms with the correct priority listed on there. Sounds like a workable solution...
weasil is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 06:10 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Absolutely.... but its pathetic that ONE it took this to get to that point... and TWO that in this day and age we have to resort to paper forms.....
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 07-11-2008, 09:52 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by TripleMix View Post
Nice. So did you relieve your guilt sufficiently before expressing your hatred? It's amazing the arrogance of some of the regional guys. And the same goes for the legacy guys. We're control freaks, for God's sake, and arrogance and control run hand-in-hand.

NO ONE should go out of business. If United "goes down," there will be 8,000 more pilots to compete with, and fewer jobs available. Some people need to wise up and need to quit wishing for other's doom. It's your own future your toying with.
not wishing for anyones doom... but the fact of the matter is one of the legacy carriers is gonna go down before the rest move on... its either gonna be US Airways or United and my vote is strongly in favor of y'all. it never ceases to amaze me at how unwilling an unyielding united is to change. i remember hearing stories about how UAL pilots (and other legacy pilots for that matter) would laugh at the SWA guys and point at their little brown and tan 737's... yikes.

arrogance of the regional guy? hmmm...

oh you mean like UAL thinkin their guys should have priority on my plane?

or

do you mean the UAL CA&FO that came up to me in the terminal after a flight they were both deadheading on got cancelled and proceeded to tell me how my regional makes United look bad?

my response... or it could be your terrible leadership, operations, hubs, routes, fleet, and attitude that makes your company look bad.
tzadik is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
WatchThis!
Regional
52
07-05-2008 11:40 PM
Razor
Mergers and Acquisitions
23
04-22-2008 04:04 PM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices