Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   ARJ21 First Flight (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/34091-arj21-first-flight.html)

Splanky 12-01-2008 01:11 PM

ARJ21 First Flight
 
ARJ21 First Flight

Watch out Boeing and Airbus (Sarcasm)!! The big boys don't need to worry until China learns to build their own airplanes, rather than re-engine and re-wing existing airplanes.

It is a bummer though that they are marketing what is essentially a DC-9 as a regional airplane.

waflyboy 12-01-2008 01:52 PM

I wonder how much of this airplane is produced outside of China through worldwide suppliers....

TonyWilliams 12-01-2008 02:39 PM

Didn't they put regional jet engines on it (GE CF-34's)? I'd guess that it will perform much like a RJ... except worse aerodynamics, probably heavier, etc.

CTPILOT 12-01-2008 02:41 PM

I have to say it does look pretty nice, curious to see what the flightdeck looks like and who are the buyers.

waflyboy 12-01-2008 02:41 PM

Yeah, I noticed that. Looking at the specs, the weight is similar to a -900.

waflyboy 12-01-2008 02:44 PM

From Fltnews.com:


The ARJ 21 is built using tooling provided by McDonnell Douglas for licenses production of the MD-90. The ARJ21 has a strong resemblance to the DC-9 series aircraft with identical nose profile and cabin cross-section. The ARJ21 has a new supercritical wing fitted with winglets. It also features western avionics, a fly-by-wire flight control system, and General Electric engines. The initial variant will be the -700. Additional variants will include a stretched fuselage, extended range models, a cargo airplane, and a business jet variant.
AVIC1 ARJ21- Flt News

Interesting stuff.

Senior Skipper 12-01-2008 03:59 PM


Originally Posted by waflyboy (Post 509453)
I wonder how much of this airplane is produced outside of China through worldwide suppliers....

Airbus is planning on shifting A320 production to...you guessed it, China.

It's only a matter of time before there's a "Made in China" sticker in your cockpit.:rolleyes:

UnlimitedAkro 12-01-2008 04:02 PM


Originally Posted by Senior Skipper (Post 509546)
It's only a matter of time before there's a "Made in China" sticker in your cockpit.:rolleyes:

And then on my kit bag.

ExperimentalAB 12-01-2008 06:35 PM

"Made in China" will start looking like DMI stickers in Mesa aircraft LoL

Senior Skipper 12-01-2008 07:15 PM


Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB (Post 509647)
"Made in China" will start looking like DMI stickers in Mesa aircraft LoL

DMI?

10 characters

ExperimentalAB 12-01-2008 07:22 PM


Originally Posted by Senior Skipper (Post 509676)
DMI?

Short for Deferred Maintenance Item ;)

BobSakamano 12-01-2008 07:39 PM

Here's a PHOTO of the flight deck. It looks like a CRJ replica. Collins Pro-Line, very similar switchgear. The center console looks nearly identical.

ExperimentalAB 12-01-2008 07:43 PM


Originally Posted by BobSakamano (Post 509694)
Here's a PHOTO of the flight deck. It looks like a CRJ replica. Collins Pro-Line, very similar switchgear. The center console looks nearly identical.

How original :rolleyes:

vtbvtdk 12-01-2008 07:45 PM

That's a nice looking cockpit. I like the moving map/radar in place of the HSI below artificial horizon on the PFD. I wonder though, how necessary is the HUD...?

ExperimentalAB 12-01-2008 07:48 PM


Originally Posted by vtbvtdk (Post 509701)
That's a nice looking cockpit. I like the moving map/radar in place of the HSI below artificial horizon on the PFD. I wonder though, how necessary is the HUD...?

It'll probably be an option that won't be excersized LoL

BobSakamano 12-01-2008 07:51 PM


Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB (Post 509706)
It'll probably be an option that won't be excersized LoL

Exactly. Picture it with 1 FMS, no HUD and a bunch of blank plates where the options would go. There you'll have an accurate regional airliner.

ExperimentalAB 12-01-2008 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by BobSakamano (Post 509711)
Exactly. Picture it with 1 FMS, no HUD and a bunch of blank plates where the options would go. There you'll have an accurate regional airliner.

Ayep that sounds more like our reality ;)

ehaeckercfi 12-01-2008 07:53 PM

It seems to me that they simply mated a DC-9 with CRJ engines and flight deck.

ehaeckercfi 12-01-2008 07:56 PM


Originally Posted by BobSakamano (Post 509711)
Exactly. Picture it with 1 FMS, no HUD and a bunch of blank plates where the options would go. There you'll have an accurate regional airliner.

Don't forget the bent up hotel key cards used to hold speed cards in place :p

405PA 12-02-2008 06:25 AM

Besides the lead posining didn't we call this the 717 the first time this came out?:rolleyes:

vtbvtdk 12-02-2008 06:41 AM


Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi (Post 509717)
It seems to me that they simply mated a DC-9 with CRJ engines and flight deck.


Yeah if you go to the news site that's linked and click on the hyperlink to the ARJ21-700 aircraft info, it talks about the design. Quote:

"The ARJ 21 is built using tooling provided by McDonnell Douglas for licenses production of the MD-90. The ARJ21 has a strong resemblance to the DC-9 series aircraft with identical nose profile and cabin cross-section."

So there you go. They aren't ashamed at all. DC-9 on the outside and in the cabin, CRJ in the cockpit and on the engine pylons....:D

ChickenFlight 12-02-2008 08:19 AM

Nobody tell Northwest or Delta that you can put CRJ engines on a DC-9 or they'll try it

Avroman 12-02-2008 08:29 AM


Originally Posted by BobSakamano (Post 509694)
Here's a PHOTO of the flight deck. It looks like a CRJ replica. Collins Pro-Line, very similar switchgear. The center console looks nearly identical.

Well the Communists have always been good at stealing a western design, repainting it, and calling it thier own design.....:rolleyes:

flyviper 12-02-2008 08:45 AM

I want to puke with some of the negative comments on this board.

Splanky 12-02-2008 09:21 AM


Originally Posted by flyviper (Post 509973)
I want to puke with some of the negative comments on this board.

I know, geez. Why do all the people posting think that a company shouldn't call a plane their own, new design when they piece together a bunch of different components from other airplanes. Its not like China has rules against this or anything.

I think I will go vomit too. :(

waflyboy 12-02-2008 09:28 AM


Originally Posted by ChickenFlight (Post 509942)
Nobody tell Northwest or Delta that you can put CRJ engines on a DC-9 or they'll try it

LOL!!!! Now that's funny.... and probably true! At least I wouldn't have to choke on blue smoke every time I depart behind one!

SmoothLanderJ 12-02-2008 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB (Post 509697)
How original :rolleyes:

Exaclty......I mean thats bascially the CRJ (200,700,900) cockpit. Combine that with the DC-9 body and everything else......

But hey Im not hating, im glad that it flew.......

rickair7777 12-02-2008 12:21 PM

IIRC, the ARJ21 was designed for a specific domestic flying niche in china. I don't think it will even be certified by the FAA/JAA...so we probably won't see it in mesa colors (unless you go to china).

Poprocket 12-02-2008 12:53 PM

The wing is Russian, the engines are American (GE CF34-10A, used on EMB190/195s).

And how original: ARJ-21: Asian Regional Jet, 21st century.

Even though the fuselage dates back to the 50s and the engines to the 80s.

Whatever, China.

flynavyj 12-02-2008 01:48 PM


Originally Posted by 405PA (Post 509863)
Besides the lead posining didn't we call this the 717 the first time this came out?:rolleyes:

much the same, and just like people got mad at boeing for calling it their own design, the Chinese are doing the same thing....Guess you could say we caused it ourselves though, had McDonald Douglas not tried to export manufacturing to China, it probably wouldn't have happened that way anyway.

I can only think of how the "performance" would be, with underpowered engines on a DC9 body....sounds SLOW.

Qtip 12-02-2008 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by Avroman (Post 509955)
Well the Communists have always been good at stealing a western design, repainting it, and calling it thier own design.....:rolleyes:

Mossad stole drawings of the Mirage to further develop their (IDF's) Kfir, also based on an earlier version of the Mirage.

SmoothOnTop 12-02-2008 02:14 PM


Originally Posted by Senior Skipper (Post 509676)
DMI?

10 characters

If your regional is better than others, you don't use FAA/ICAO terms such as "MEL" stickers for deferrals.

Back to the aircraft:

15K thrust is on par with the old DC-9 engines..

Does it have leading edge devices???

Flyboy8784 12-02-2008 02:18 PM

Ill bet it taxiis like a drifting car...the only aircraft in the world that take turns at 90 knots on slick pavement :p

Whatever China....we'll never see this thing here

TonyWilliams 12-02-2008 06:48 PM


Originally Posted by SmoothOnTop (Post 510242)

Does it have leading edge devices???


Does the DC-9? You'd think I'd know that after building the DC-9 in Long Beach for Douglas, but I honestly don't remember. Obviously, the Super 80 series does.

ehaeckercfi 12-03-2008 08:33 AM

I know the DC-9-30 does. The -10 does not. I'm not sure if there are any variations between the -10 and -30 that may or may not have them.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands