![]() |
BFR and Part 121 Currency
So my local FBO wants some sort of documentation for their files showing my currency. I sent them the applicable quote from 61.56 but they want something to put in their file cabnet. Anyone have any suggestions?
|
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 518212)
So my local FBO wants some sort of documentation for their files showing my currency. I sent them the applicable quote from 61.56 but they want something to put in their file cabnet. Anyone have any suggestions?
|
Copy of PC and LOFT recurrent paperwork with SAT checked off will suffice, if not their just being jerks.
|
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 518212)
So my local FBO wants some sort of documentation for their files showing my currency. I sent them the applicable quote from 61.56 but they want something to put in their file cabnet. Anyone have any suggestions?
|
Originally Posted by captain152
(Post 518276)
Your recurrent PC and Ground qualify for your BFR ... if they don't accept the paperwork on that, find a different FBO that isn't retarded
It makes sense that it would, but it doesn't spell that out in the regs. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 518281)
Does anyone know of an AC or FAA legal interpretation which says that 121 PC/LOFT/recurrent counts as an operating privilege per 61.56(d) ?
It makes sense that it would, but it doesn't spell that out in the regs. |
All of this rigermoral for you and they're probably letting any schmo off the street instruct for them and sign people off
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 518281)
Does anyone know of an AC or FAA legal interpretation which says that 121 PC/LOFT/recurrent counts as an operating privilege per 61.56(d) ?
It makes sense that it would, but it doesn't spell that out in the regs. I don't see how it's not spelled out in the regs. (d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section. I can't find any gray in that part of 61.56(d). Where's the confusion? |
There are many FBO's out there that think they are all god's gift to aviation, and will give you all the crap they can in the world.
I'm willing to bet $10 that you'll go back, show them that reg, and your copies of your checks, and they'll still insist of you getting a BFR from one of their instructors |
Originally Posted by Atreyu
(Post 518343)
There are many FBO's out there that think they are all god's gift to aviation, and will give you all the crap they can in the world.
I'm willing to bet $10 that you'll go back, show them that reg, and your copies of your checks, and they'll still insist of you getting a BFR from one of their instructors |
Originally Posted by fjetter
(Post 518410)
Most FBOs are still gonna require you to do a checkout with one of their instructors for insurance purposes. Flying a 172 is significantly different from an RJ
|
Originally Posted by Copperhed51
(Post 518340)
I don't see how it's not spelled out in the regs.
(d) A person who has, within the period specified in paragraph (c) of this section, passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege need not accomplish the flight review required by this section. I can't find any gray in that part of 61.56(d). Where's the confusion? I'm not saying it doesn't, but legally the fed could interpret that any way they like. I have enough experience with law to know that this reg (like many FARs) is weak and open to interpretation. Remember this is not criminal or civil law where the tie goes to the runner...the grey area usually goes to the feds. |
"...passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an examiner..."
... sounds like your question was answered in there. Not sure what else you need. A SIC PC is a PROFICIENCY CHECK conducted by an EXAMINER ... that's a done deal, no questions asked. Now, you may still have to be checked out by one of their instructors in one of their planes to go fly, but that's typical of any FBO |
Thanks for all the replies. I was hoping to avoid having to get a copy of my pc. I used to instruct there and I walk in the place in uniform all the time. The lady running the place is just super anal about having paperwork.
I might just go flying and then have a beer with one of my cfi friends. That sounds more entertaining than doing a paper chase. |
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 518540)
Thanks for all the replies. I was hoping to avoid having to get a copy of my pc. I used to instruct there and I walk in the place in uniform all the time. The lady running the place is just super anal about having paperwork.
I might just go flying and then have a beer with one of my cfi friends. That sounds more entertaining than doing a paper chase. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 518429)
What is an operating privelege? Does an SIC PC count?
I'm not saying it doesn't, but legally the fed could interpret that any way they like. I have enough experience with law to know that this reg (like many FARs) is weak and open to interpretation. Remember this is not criminal or civil law where the tie goes to the runner...the grey area usually goes to the feds. |
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 518540)
The lady running the place is just super anal about having paperwork.
Don't take it personally. |
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 518540)
I was hoping to avoid having to get a copy of my pc.
|
Originally Posted by RuttR
(Post 519268)
Your company doesnt require you to carry a copy of your last check with you?
nope. not here at pinnacle anyway. |
Originally Posted by RuttR
(Post 519268)
Your company doesnt require you to carry a copy of your last check with you?
Part 121: "A company shall not use and an airman shall not serve..." & blah blah... By the nature of operational control the CP, scheduler, dispatcher, airman shall ensure that the crew member (basically the "company" as specified in your FOM, or equivalent) is current and qualified before operating under that rule. I find it strange if a crew member must carry documents (other than cert. and medical) showing their qualifications and currency. I have never seen anything about this in 8400.10 but that doesn't mean its not there. And as always, call your local FSDO if in doubt. |
Originally Posted by lowflying
(Post 518540)
I used to instruct there and I walk in the place in uniform all the time. The lady running the place is just super anal about having paperwork.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.;) |
Originally Posted by RuttR
(Post 519268)
Your company doesnt require you to carry a copy of your last check with you?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:10 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands